Issues with the time card. First, this time card was for the week ending 6/19, the means his time for 6/12 would be the last entry on the previous time card. The written in time would be for Monday. Secondly, the security guard from the restaurant (the one with the video testimony from 2004) was adamant that they didn't stay open late on Sunday and Jason would have been gone by 9:30. According to the time card they had, he worked until 10:20pm (electronic punch) on Sunday 6/19... so again that testimony has to be dismissed or the time card has to be dismissed. They can't both be correct. How can they crack investigators not see what was so obvious to the rest of us by episode 2? Because if they make those conclusions then they don't have a show.
Issues with the time card. First, this time card was for the week ending 6/19, the means his time for 6/12 would be the last entry on the previous time card. The written in time would be for Monday. Secondly, the security guard from the restaurant (the one with the video testimony from 2004) was adamant that they didn't stay open late on Sunday and Jason would have been gone by 9:30. According to the time card they had, he worked until 10:20pm (electronic punch) on Sunday 6/19... so again that testimony has to be dismissed or the time card has to be dismissed. They can't both be correct. How can they crack investigators not see what was so obvious to the rest of us by episode 2? Because if they make those conclusions then they don't have a show.