Jump to content

Type keyword(s) to search

Leroux

Member
  • Posts

    298
  • Joined

Posts posted by Leroux

  1. What an emotional recount from the cast. 

    Loved the background and especially how involved the unknown soldier became.  

    Even though he bent the knee, he still talks about Jon like his king. Love that part. 

    • Love 9
  2. 10 minutes ago, filmfan2480 said:

    So the reason Jon was not King or not tossed around as possible King was because and ONLY because the Iron Throne was no more?  Is this correct?

    I think Jon has made perfect;y clear that "he doesn't want it" 

    IMO Jon would be 100% happier hanging with the wildings than being King and hanging with the court of Kings Landing. I think his ending was perfect, once he found the courage to do what was best for Westeros and kill a woman who was not going to ever stop conquering cities with her Dracarys style. 

    • Love 15
  3. 31 minutes ago, dramachick said:

    Loved the ending! The Starks finally came out on top! Yay!

    I was a little bit worried for Jon, but when they said he was going to the Night's Watch I knew he would be okay because there wasn't any Night's Watch, just free folk living beyond the wall doing their own thing.

    I am sure Jon will be sometimes at Castle Black and just spend a few weeks there but his real home will be with the wildings. 

    It was mainly done to appease Grey Worm and company but maybe Tyrion played a little bit on how little the Unsullied and Dotraki know about Westeros culture and how the NW basically has ceased to exist, so all the more power to Jon. The wildings already respect him and admire him. Tormunds gets to be his right hand. 

    I was happy to hear that Arya and Sansa both fought hard for Jon but there needed to be concessions made and this solution fits the bill. 

    • Love 17
  4. 28 minutes ago, HunterHunted said:

    Ummmm....Explorer and Pirate Queen. 

    Jon is the King Beyond the Wall. Sansa is the Queen in the North. Bran is the King of the Seven Six Kingdoms.

    I like that, the King beyond the Wall, his sister Sansa is his neighbor being the QITN so they can have regular meetings and trades, learn to cohabitate, the North and the Free Folk. 

    His brother is the King of the six kingdoms and that also works to the advantage of the Wildings. Jon gets to be King in all but name. I like that. The Wildings are upfront and not so much into politics and double talking so this suits Jon's style perfectly. 

    • Love 17
  5. 13 minutes ago, kieyra said:

    She didn’t want a Stark on the Melty Throne, she wanted independence for the North. That’s been her arc for a while, and it was nice to see her get it after everything she’s been through. 

    I absolutely loved her coronation. Nobody has worked as hard as Sansa for an independent North. I believe she would have asked the same of Jon if he was named King. 

    My hope for her is that she gets to be the Elizabeth of the North. After all she has been through I don't think she ever wants to be with a man again. 

    When Arya gets done traveling she can settle (not marry) and have babies with Gendry, babies who will be Starks or maybe even after Bran pardons Jon, then Sansa can give him the Stark name and Jon's children could be her heirs. 

    • Love 19
  6. 48 minutes ago, WatchrTina said:

    Yep. And "No one" is exactly who is going to take her out next week.  Mark my words!

    I sure hope so.  Somebody has to, just might well be Arya to save her family. 

    Arya will have to save Sansa and probably Bran as well.

    God knows Jon won't move a finger except to kiss Daenerys' feet. 

    • Love 4
  7. 48 minutes ago, Brn2bwild said:

    Did anyone even bother to explain to Dany beforehand that the bells being rung meant surrender?!  Tyrion seemed to mention it to everyone else except her.

    She knew. Tyrion explained it to her and she agreed. Grey Worm was there as a witness

    She fully knew what the ringing of the bells meant. She made the executive decision to kill civilians and destroy the city despite the surrender. 

    Now I understand why Bran needed Jon to know about his birth, he probably wanted to avoid this, he just couldn't figure out that Jon would become another of her yes man. All the signs have been there for anyone who cared to see but most viewers were in love with her and her dragons so the signs were dismissed. She has said it dozen on times. It has come from her own mouth: Fire and Blood, burn city to ashes, burn cities to the ground. All part of her promises. 

    Tonight she did well on her promises of seven seasons. 

    • Love 19
  8. 6 minutes ago, gooberfish said:

    There’s going to be a spat between Auntie and Nephew.

    Probably not, Jon loves his Queen and didn't blink an eye when Varys was burned to a crisp.

    I hope he knows that the next one in front of Drogon is going to be Sansa. 

    He probably won't care, as long as Daenerys gets to sit on her throne we all should be happy. 

    • Love 3
  9. 17 hours ago, Absurda said:

    My point was she should have consulted with them BEFORE the meeting to have definite information rather than just a general statement and an "I'll get back to you later on that".

    Wouldn't that be Jon's job though? Sansa is the Lady of WF, why would she have that information, it would be more a question of common sense. You do not send recovering troops to another battle right away. Sansa had to remind her that these troops were her troops as well, as a Queen she should be looking for their welfare too. 

    How about Grey Worm, how about Davos, how about the Dotraki guy at the meeting, Jon doesn't count because he has become a simpering fool around her, wouldn't they have the common sense to know that answer? They probably knew their troops needed rest but they are all Daenerys yes men so nobody was asking the evident question and Sansa did it. 

    Daenerys has surrounded herself with such advisors, none of them good, they are either scared of her, in love with her or not used to question her at all. Jorah's common sense might have helped but then again Daenerys only does what she wants regardless of any advise given so the monumental mistakes that have cost her a dragon, some ships and her best friend fall squarely on her shoulders. 

    Sansa didn't lose her a dragon, didn't lose her Missandei, didn't lose her ships. Daenerys managed to do that all on her own. 

    • Love 13
  10. 17 hours ago, RealReality said:

    I don't know that Dany is "mad" or "crazy," as I think anyone who wants to sit on the iron throne has to be a little paranoid.

    But, I think that we are seeing that "freeing people of their chains" is generally incompatible with being their queen.  

    Dany has an army that willingly fights for her, she has people that would willingly die for her.  But how can you be breaker of chains if you torch people alive who do not choose your rule?  How do you be a queen to those who don't consent to your rule if they are truly free?  She isn't going to win the iron throne by a electoral college vote, she has to MAKE people accept her as queen, and she has shown a willingness to do that by any means necessary.

    This is fine, but I think it's a struggle we're seeing.  If your message is that everyone is free from their bondage, then are her recent actions in line with that message?  I guess you could choose death, but that is the same choice under a cersei administration.

    Cersei wins because she will make Dany stoop to her level to win, or she will have to lose trying not to kill innocents.

    Cersei wins one way or the other. I think Cersei realizes that is over, there is no way she can hold onto power so she is going with a bang. She is using people as human shields, she still has catches of wildfire all around the city and she is consciously baiting Daenerys to attack and burn the city to the ground. Like Tyrion told her, she hates the people of KL so she doesn't care if they live or die. 

    The issue at hand is why is Daeneys taking the bait? Strategically she has taken all the wrong decisions, she could have scouted, she could have stopped at the Vale and organize from there, she could have retaken Riverrun back from the Lanisters who are now huddle up in KLs, she could have communicated with the new prince of Dorne and ask for more people, communicate with Daario and ask him to send more of her armies in Essos. She could have gone to battle much better prepared and still have Rhaegal and Missandei by her side. They have a plan that doesn't include the use of dragons, Tyrion has warned her since last season that there is wildfire all over the city and that is why they haven't attack KL as soon as they arrived. Her best weapon at this point would have been to surround Cersei on all fronts, have all the other kingdoms on her side and surround KL, block all services and food deliveries, every day she doesn't attack cost Cersei money for the soldiers of the GC. Then wait for the people inside the city to start a riot because they are starved. This is the strategy that basically was going to win her the throne, it would be slower but it would avoid mass murdering of civilians. Once it is over she sweeps the city and sets food delivery immediately for the people, maesters for the injured, orphanages, etc. 

    She did exactly the opposite, made rush decisions that have cost her another one of her dragons and her best friend and now she is enraged and ready to retaliate which is exactly what Cersei wants. Cersei wants her to set her dragons on the city, she wants the city to burn to ashes so once Daenerys finally wins the war her reign will be tainted forever. She would be the queen who burned the city to the ground with 1M-1/2M people inside it, how do you recover from that? how would she feel about that?

    Daenerys has backed herself into a corner and it all could have been prevented. 

    • Love 6
  11. 51 minutes ago, WaltersHair said:

    I think Sansa should rule. I don't like Dany or Jon as a good fit.

    What is Tyrion fighting for? Does he have a goal in mind?

    Brienne is the big loser in all this. I respect Jaimie's decision, but damn.

    Sansa only wants to be Lady of WF, she doesn't want the throne or Tyrion. let her stay in WF. The best solution IMO would be: 

    1)Dany and Jon (no dragons) rule together as monarchs but with a council of seven giving all the kingdoms some form of independence but under their supervision. 

    2) Jon and Dany (with Drogon) set up a council of seven and give each kingdom their independence (breaking the wheel) and they fly to an unknown place where they can be happy ever after) 

    Both of these solutions would imply relinquishing power which IMO Jon will be happy to do but not Daenerys. What would be the purpose of going thru this much war and deaths if at the end there would be one ruler for the IT. Nothing would have changed. Somehow I always thought that the end of the series would be a change from monarchic ways to more democratic ones. 

    • Love 7
×
×
  • Create New...