Jump to content

Type keyword(s) to search

dewelar

Member
  • Posts

    221
  • Joined

Posts posted by dewelar

  1. Only in this country -- they were pretty big in their native UK. I actually preferred their follow-up single, which was also a top 30 song in the US.

    (Can't figure out how to insert the link as an image like the previous post...)

    • Like 1
  2. 21 hours ago, Moose135 said:

    There's no tying in baseball! There's no tying in baseball!

    Well, yeah, and "A baseball game can't end in a goddamn tie!" 😁 It'd still be better than this abomination.

    • Like 3
    • LOL 1
  3. 55 minutes ago, Black Knight said:

    They needed to do something to put a ceiling on OT, like other sports have.

    I'd rather they just declare a tie after, say, 12 innings. This is just gimmickry for the sake of gimmickry.

    • Like 4
  4. 20 hours ago, roseha said:

    "Total Eclipse of the Heart" by Bonnie Taylor.

    No offense to Bonnie Taylor but while it was playing I thought "This sounds exactly like a Meat Loaf record".  That's how bombastic the whole thing is.  Not a compliment!

    It sounds like a Meat Loaf record because everything Jim Steinman produced pretty much sounded like that.

    (Also, it's Bonnie Tyler.)

    • Like 3
    • Applause 1
  5. 19 hours ago, WendyCR72 said:

    In terms of cartoon characters with Christmas songs, "Snoopy's Christmas" by the Royal Guardsmen was more my jam!

    My mother had the 45 when I was a kid. Loved that record. Still love the song, I admit it!

    This reminds me of one of my best Christmas memories. My mom also had a copy when I was a kid, but it got broken at some point, and she could never find another copy. Years later, when I was in high school in the mid-80s I worked at K-Mart across the street from a record store that I would go into almost every lunch hour (when I wasn't in the arcade next door). One day I was in there and happened across a copy, so I bought it and hid it in my dresser for weeks, then snuck it under the tree on Christmas Eve with a "from Santa" tag. Her reaction was just the best :D .

    • Love 3
  6. Yes, five episodes in now and Peter has grown on me a bit since the first episode, but Jordan hasn't really. Also, is it me, or does it feel like the show is focused more on the judges and presenters and less on the bakers than it has in past seasons? Again, five episodes in, and I don't really find myself connecting with any of the bakers the way I did with, say, season 2's Trev or last season's Pera.

  7. Well, they certainly brought different energy. Peter Gordon felt stuffy, and Jordan Rondel gave off a very self-important vibe. They reminded me of the stereotypical view of art critics, right down to their sartorial choices. I will remind myself that this is just one episode, and my view is being colored by being a big fan of Sue and Dean (they were my favorite judging pair of all the iterations of this that I watch -- i.e. British/Australian/Canadian/Kiwi), but so far not a fan.

  8. 17 hours ago, DXD526 said:

    I once saw a 27-pitch game in high school softball. There were two foul balls, both by the same batter, but other than that, lots of swings and misses. Ugly swings and misses. This pitcher was quite something.

    If there were foul balls and swings and misses, it was not a 21-pitch game -- a perfect game, sure, but foul balls and swings and misses still count as pitches. If there were two foul balls, that would mean at least 23 pitches for the 21 outs (which would still be one hell of a performance, at any level).

  9. 7 minutes ago, pdlinda said:

    My belief in the "randomness" of the selections COLLAPSED when that happened!!   I now view the show as "staged".

    I still remember last season when I noted that Justin Warner was (I think literally) always the one presenting the underdog's dish. I forgot to track that this season :) .

    As far as the randomizer bit...I'm willing to grant that Guy probably asks everyone which items they don't want to get, and they only show it when it actually comes up. I wouldn't be surprised if it was otherwise, though -- although I don't think it would take away from the show if that was the case since, unlike my example above, it doesn't affect the judging, which is really the main thing that keeps things at least somewhat honest.

    • Love 3
  10. 2 hours ago, Rammchick said:

    It's reasonable to assume that the producers had a hand in it because they used that clip of Ben mouthing off to Duff as an intro for several weeks before the show aired.  Whatever they privately thought about it, they surely mined it for everything they could get.

    Indeed. Seeing that clip repeatedly almost made me decide not to watch the season at all, but I decided to give it a chance. Now I wish I'd trusted my instincts. Like others have indicated, I will be waiting until he's been eliminated to start watching again.

    • Love 1
  11. 17 hours ago, WendyCR72 said:

    Last year, Pentatonix "augmented" Whitney Houston's "Do You Hear What I Hear?". This year, they played around with Paul McCartney's "Wonderful Christmastime" (which, admittedly, was no "Happy Xmas (War Is Over)", but pleasant enough...).

    Why do they do this? Sigh. For some reason I just cannot put my finger on, this group bugs me. (I know we discussed that.)  I heard some of their original Christmas songs and it all just blends together for me. All a matter of different tastes, etc., I guess.

    And yet, I like Straight No Chaser, another group that can do acapella (and other stuff). So, go figure. (Their "Christmas Can-Can" is always good for a laugh.)

    Mrs. Dew and I are typically fans of a capella music (her more than me), and have a similar reaction to both groups, especially when it comes to their respective holiday music. I think it might be because Pentatonix sounds too technically polished, where SNC sound more like they're enjoying themselves on their recordings. I remember a few years ago when we saw Pentatonix on The Sing-Off that we were really looking forward to their album, and subsequently being quite underwhelmed. Sadly, nothing seems to have changed.

    • Love 1
  12. 22 hours ago, Bastet said:

    That's what Guy has said, that they don't even know who's in the tournament.

    Right, but if they have clues to who the higher seed is in a round, that can affect their decision, even if it's only subconsciously. I'm not saying that is necessarily the case, but it was notable to me that the same person presented the higher-ranked chef's dish each time (unless I missed something).

    • Love 1
  13. I'm enjoying this show once again, and I've noticed a couple of things. First, there are fewer "upsets" this season than there were last. Second -- and this may be related -- it seems that when they're describing the dishes, Simon is always the one describing the dish of the higher-ranked chef and Justin the lower. Maybe the judging isn't so blind?

×
×
  • Create New...