Jump to content

Type keyword(s) to search

Rosiejuliemom

Member
  • Posts

    2.2k
  • Joined

Posts posted by Rosiejuliemom

  1. 18 minutes ago, nexxie said:

    That she’s loving and kind, when she’s actually calculating and not so kind.

    Feeding the homeless and tirelessly campaigning for an end to animal torture?

    That heartless bitch!

    She should be filmed making a sack lunch and driving around until she finds someone who needs it!

    • Love 24
  2. 2 hours ago, nexxie said:

    As I posted above, LVP could have (and should have) reminded Dorit of her contract and demanded she return the dog immediately. It’s not right to let some negligent people off the hook, but not others.

    Once the dog left Dorit, it would have been up to the new owner to surrender her voluntarily. If someone bought a jacket from someone and gave it to someone else, the original owner can't demand the jacket back. In the eyes of California law, the same logic applied to Lucy.

    Lisa not enforcing the penalty is an entirely separate issue. Should she insist that the Kemsley's pay? Probably.

    • Love 15
  3. 24 minutes ago, nexxie said:

    Of course Lisa could have done something - giving her a pass makes no sense if the dog is really a concern.

    What could she have done more than she did? Other than sue for breach of contract? We don't even know if Lisa can do that as their Bravo contracts prohibit them from suing each other for any reason.

    She asked Dorit for the new owner's name and contact information, Dorit wouldn't give her a straight answer. It seems that there wasn't a large time gap between Dorit telling Lisa and VPD getting the call from the shelter. Maybe a few days. Lisa made sure that Lucy was retrieved from the shelter as soon as possible. That was the only thing she could do at that time.

    • Useful 1
    • Love 21
  4. 6 minutes ago, nexxie said:

    The trashing of Dorit regarding the dog is pretty silly considering LVP was told about the new home the next day and a) did not ask for the dog to be returned, and b) did not screen the new owner or her home. 

    Since Dorit didn't tell Lisa until after it happened, Lisa's hands were tied. She wouldn't have been able to get the dog returned or screen the new owner. Per California law at the time, pets were considered property. Once Dorit gave Lucy away, Lisa couldn't do anything about it. It was a matter of luck and a microchip that Lucy got back to VPD at all.

    If she was even given to a new owner and not just dumped at the shelter by Dorit.

    • Useful 1
    • Love 18
  5. 1 minute ago, SheTalksShit said:

    Does anyone else recall when Erika went crazy on Eileen because Eileen said, offhandedly, “It’s not like she killed your child!” 

    Then she turned it into, “Well, my son is a police officer, he really could get killed!” Umm ya everybody’s child could get killed, not just your son. That irritated me. And it was obvious that’s not really what she was upset about, what she was really upset about was that Eileen was no longer taking her side. 

    Wasn't that the first time we saw Erika's weird, unwarranted rage? Maybe not completely unwarranted, given what was happening at that time, but extremely disproportionate.

    She never did really apologize for it, either.

    • Love 22
  6. 1 minute ago, SheTalksShit said:

    I have to admit, Teddi has a point here: 

    I think maybe she was exhausted by Sessa's relentless talking about it and wanting Dorit held accountable, so she said, "Fine, tell whoever, I don't care if you tell Donald Trump, FFS!" But then later changed her mind when she realized her husband, Ken, was adamantly against putting it out there because he and Dorit's husband, PK, are close friends. 

    It seems obvious, at this point, that John Sessa was the one who really wanted this story out there, he's the one who hand-reared the puppy, so he's the one who had the most emotional investment in the puppy and what happened. I think everyone else just kinda went along with it because he was relentless about holding Dorit accountable. 

    That's pretty much what she said on the bus to the airport and in her blog. She didn't give a shit who said what about it, she just wanted the dog out of the shelter.

    • Love 23
  7. 28 minutes ago, Dance4Life said:

    Why is Lisa Rinna so punch-able???

    She could be so good on this show with her cute family and Hollywood life.  I love her house.

    but,.......she is punchable! 

    is this even a word? There is an emoji for it! 👊🏻

    Her anus lips kinda look like a target?

    • LOL 9
    • Love 8
  8. 25 minutes ago, Keywestclubkid said:

    You have Dorit story changing mixed with Teddi and Teddi isn’t allowed to release everything due to bravo and her contract so stay tuned 

    No, I don't.

    I'm well aware as to how Dorit's story has changed.

    Teddi's has as well. She is trying to do everything she can to take away from the verifiable fact that she was a willing participant in this.

    Much like you keep repeating that people can be mad about Dorit's actions and Lisa's supposed manipulation, others can see that both Dorit and Teddi are lying.

    • Love 22
×
×
  • Create New...