Jump to content

Type keyword(s) to search

DCCFan197605

Member
  • Posts

    167
  • Joined

Posts posted by DCCFan197605

  1. 1 hour ago, ShutterbugCAM said:

    And bring back the Kitty Carter episode (usually around episode 5 or 6 of a season).

    I hated that her screen time was cut to make the show meet network leadership’s niceness objectives.

    • Love 2
  2. Good interview with Austin Winsberg.  About Max hearing Zoey’s heart song:

    DEADLINE: How did you decide that flipping the script on Zoey, and reuniting her with Max, was the way to go with for end of the season?

    AUSTIN WINSBERG: You know, we had been talking about giving Max the powers for a long time. It was something that had been discussed since midway through season one, and we had dropped a lot of hints throughout the season, in these conversations, and fights between Zoey and Max, about the inequality in the relationship. About the fact that it is unfair for him, that she gets to hear what’s going on in his head, and he doesn’t get to hear what’s going on in hers.

    So we’ve really planted that a lot, and then, with her dad coming to her, in the finale, and talking to her about being part of the universe. Maybe, the universe does everything for a reason. To have that happen at the end is just an interesting way to finally give them that equality, because I think that, in any relationship in life, there needs to be equality.

    And I feel like they were never going to be able to fully make it, unless he could at least empathize, or understand what she’s going through.

    • Love 6
  3. On 5/16/2021 at 10:47 PM, DanaK said:

    I think it’s more than 50% likely this show will get moved to Peacock

    Well, finally a reason to download Peacock.  Moreover, I never watch on broadcast days anyway.

    15 hours ago, ElectricBoogaloo said:

    reminded me of the Buffy musical episode when she had some serious PTSD and was going through an existential crisis

    Joy is having “Once More with Feeling” referenced!

    • Love 3
  4. Want to issue a mea culpa on Rachel W.  I posted a few years back that she was likely insincere in her commitment to the team and would be on her way to a broadcasting spot after a year or two.  I am so pleased she’s still here performing.   Sometimes, it’s really nice to be wrong.

    • Useful 1
    • Love 12
  5. 2 hours ago, onthebubble said:

    "She's being out performed by the rookies! Shes just not the strongest in the room!' 

    Last year still pisses me off.  You got the strongest rookie class ever?  Congratulations, you make the process the most accessible, low-sacrifice it has ever been; attract dancers who never would before and never will again make the normal sacrifices; and then, you’re surprised by how terrific they are?  What do you do to the ladies who have paid the price and put up with your BS?  Jettison  them.  Time will tell if this class’ average tenure matches those before.  My bet is it won’t.

    • Useful 1
    • Love 14
  6. 2 hours ago, vanillagum said:

    i’m obsessed with it and also a little spooked, in a good way

    Four of eight ladies retiring share “a-n-a” in the middle.  Their positioning in the list gave the post a poetic quality.

    • LOL 5
    • Love 4
  7. 14 hours ago, dccfan204 said:

     

    It's not fair for Maddie and Tess to stay. They're taking up spots in the triangle and group leader positions.

     

    Let’s take judges’ ranking off the table* for a moment.  I reject the idea that once you’ve scaled a mountain that you cannot be willing to climb down it.  What I mean is that Maddie should be able to forgo point or group leadership in the organization if she wishes to stay in it and give others the chance to shine.   I don’t know if that works culturally within DCC, but it makes no sense to me you have to be a reliable blender if you meet top 36 standards and want to do a Durso run.  It becomes a disincentive to achieve #1 if you trade more years on the team for it.

    *Maddie is a shockingly low scoring vet to be point.   I am thinking of KaShara.  If she was inclined to stay, acknowledging she would move back on the triangle as a condition should be her choice.

    • Love 6
  8. 23 hours ago, dreamcatcher said:

    I don’t think they’ve used someone with less than 3 years before, which would practically mean someone fresh out of their rookie year would be leading the team next season. So I don’t think they will ever have that issue as especially lately, point girl gets everything else as well: GL, PBC, VOTY, maybe even calendar. So kashara got pbc in her third year and still came back for a 4th for example, why would she come back other than getting the 5 year ring and status? Maybe if she didn’t struggle with weight she would’ve come back.

    Also, I don’t consider what happened to Maddie a demotion, Amy got the same part last season and still was the one that was highlighted as an official point. 

    Good analysis here.   I just wonder how anyone beats Sydney Durso’s 7-year modern era record, especially if you’re point at year 3 or 4.  Lacey would have clearly been able to spend ten years on the squad if she had wanted.  She would’ve been the logical point at year 6.  Maybe she could’ve kept it a couple years (6, 7). What happens in year 8?

    Put another way, what guidance do K & J give?   We know they blindside the ladies with Show Group selection and demotion (Jalyn).  From the commentary here, it seems like during year-end evaluations K&J indicate what a veteran’s next year prospects look like.  I guess this issue hasn’t come up.  Most ladies check all of the boxes (SG, GL, PBC, VOTY, 5-year ring, Point) and go on their way.  
     

    The Amy/Maddie years were just an indication of how limited the 3 year plus pool was.   And to your point, triangle section 1 is tiny .  It makes little sense to put a lady up there for a few seconds and act like she’s point.  So, what happens to Maddie next year?  The year after?  Especially, being a fan favorite.  I have to assume it would be time to move Maddie back.

    • Love 4
  9. 4 hours ago, LilyDutch said:

    I like Maddie too, a lot actually , for most of the reasons you pointed out. So couldn’t agree more with you.


    But... that does not make you the right person to have that no. 1 position in the team.
    A point has to be front and center all the time, not just during Thunderstruck. Someone who stands out, even in a group of beautiful women. How can you make someone point of 36 people in a massive stadium when you can barely utter an audible sentence in front of a group of people with a look on your face that shouts “can I please hide or run from here?”

    So, here’s a question.   If a point girl achieves that status as a young person, and wants to have a long tenure with DCC, how is she politely demoted?  Certainly, point should be neither forced retirement or permanent.  Have we seen a demotion for fairness (not infraction) before?  What is that conversation like?

    • Useful 1
    • Love 1
  10. 5 hours ago, UnicornKicksBack said:

    I thjnk Hannah is fire and equally stunning, one of the few who doesn’t look boring pageant cutesy but more supermodel gorgeous.

    What did Tasty Oreo (Tyce Diorio) day?  “Hannah is a bullet.  Bang! Bang!”

    I’ve said before that she’s blue collar hot, but that with impeccable technique is a f***ing lot.

    • LOL 3
    • Love 5
  11. On 8/28/2020 at 4:15 PM, imacrumb said:

    personally I think Lily should’ve made it the year before

    Agreed.  It’s not a popular opinion here, but I believe Alexandria took Brennan’s spot three years ago and Brennan took Lily’s spot two years ago.  Last year, they expanded the team to make it right.  This year, they cut them both.  

    • Love 2
  12. I find it interesting that Fabiola is the best dancer of the three in the TikTok.   Eleanor is trying to be fierce or gangster.  Devi is sweet.   But it’s Fabiola who exhibits perfect choreography and control.   Her head never loses its position on the pivot.  The performance seems as precise as the character, but it also seems too smooth.  Yes, I’ve watched it 100+ times.  Best 15 seconds of TV in a while.
     

    Devi’s mom is my favorite character.   “Tell me more, Dr. HPV Infection.”

    • Love 6
  13. This audition process has its merits.  I like that each judge is watching each candidate perform on their own.  The added scrutiny should yield fairer results. It’s clear to me that traditional auditions with five candidates dancing at the same time allows judges to form wildly different opinions as they catch different parts of performances.  Also, TCCs will be the ladies that TPTB are serious about.  I like that Kelli mentioned there would be no courtesy invites this year.  I don’t recall ever hearing that stated previously.

    Moreover, I bet some candidates will learn better from tape.  Perfect it at home and then bring it to the studio.

    Obviously, this format means TPTB will not have a sense of a lady’s memory, ability to perform under pressure and to stand out.  I imagine first cuts will be swift.

     

    • Love 8
  14. Given the format this year, I’d have a preference for the past TCCs.   They already have muscle memory for Thunder, Power, and other perennial dances.   Of course, they could go out with 28 to 30 during early games and blend the new girls in if more time is needed.

×
×
  • Create New...