Jump to content

Type keyword(s) to search

buckboard

Member
  • Posts

    567
  • Joined

Posts posted by buckboard

  1. When a white woman had a child with a black man, it was possible there was a loving relationship, but the couple couldn't be together because of the social mores of the times. With the first guest, additionally, the white woman was not only having an affair with a black man, but they were committing adultery, because he was  married.

    On the other hand, it's possible their relationship wasn't consensual.  The first guest never seemed to consider this possibility.  I suppose I wouldn't want to think that about an ancestor, either.

    In either possibility, it's understandable - however regrettable -  that the white woman would want to move away and eventually, give the child up for adoption. 

    (Consider how times change:  The mother of author James McBride ("Heaven & Earth Grocery Store"), a white woman, married a black man in the 1950s and after his father's death, his white mother raised him in a black neighborhood.)  And, also, this was New York, not Georgia.

    • Like 3
  2. shapeshifter, I was interested in the Rutgers angle because I went to graduate library school there.

    And like so many others, my grandfather had a story of avoiding army service.  I think the main difference between the Jewish and non-Jewish men was that long term mandatory service for Jewish men meant they would be away from home for decades and lose touch with their religion.  So my grandfather left the farm and followed his brother to New York.  Boy, was my grandfather po'd that the streets weren't paved with gold as his brother had promised.
     


     

    • Like 3
  3. It was a season finale, not the end of the show.

    Press release from Global:

    January 31, 2024 – ... Global announced that hit Canadian legal drama Family Law has been greenlit for a fourth season with 10 all-new episodes. Produced by SEVEN24 Films and Lark Productions, and created by Canadian award-winning author Susin Nielsen, Season 4 starts production in Vancouver this March.

    • Love 2
  4. Explain to me why Bode was arrested for bringing a lost girl back to the barracks.   And after the girl's mother thanked him, he was still handcuffed and taken into custody? 

     He didn't go off with her into the woods with her to look for the grandfather, he brought her to the authorities.  Then he helped the girl give information that led to the successful rescue of the grandfather.  How is this criminal activity?

    • Like 5
    • Applause 2
  5. On 3/13/2024 at 8:04 PM, DanaK said:

    I don’t understand how the school system doesn’t have a librarian program? Isn’t that a standard thing for schools?

    Sadly, librarians are one of the first positions to go when schools have financial problems.  

    • Sad 3
    • Angry 1
    • Fire 2
    • Applause 1
  6. Countdown on how many episodes before Gabrielle ditches Diego for puppy eyes Bode.  I hope it is well before the wedding, although I suspect the writers think the latter would be more dramatic.  Or else have him die while fighting a fire.

    • Like 3
  7. So Sharon's husband didn't visit her for the six months she was away?  Because Bode needed him?  For six months?  Explain to me how that makes sense.  

    I have no doubt that Gabrielle and poor, sad, heroic Bode are the writers end game.  Either she decides that Bode is her true love or even if she winds up marrying her fiance, he'll die in a horrible accident at a fire, freeing her to get back with Bode.  

    Bode just now figured out that there is a section of the  Penal Code that a prisoner may have his sentence reduced by performing a heroic act in a life-threatening situation?  He was performing heroic acts once a week last year and the Department of Corrections didn't see fit to consider that code section.  He was going into burning buildings.  Jumping off bridges into raging rivers.  Running into more burning buildings.  Carrying unconscious victims miles to safety.  Did I mention carrying unconscious victims out of burning buildings?

    • Like 5
    • Applause 2
  8. As freeser wrote: I was surprised and disappointed that Gibbs didn't put in a brief appearance

    This was a lovely episode, but it was really inexcusable that Mark Harmon's Gibbs didn't make an appearance.  Gibbs was certainly closer to Ducky than Tony, who made the effort to fly in from Europe.

     

    • Like 10
    • Applause 2
  9. Where was Sharon all this time?  Okay, she didn't want to communicate with Bode, but did she see her husband at all?  Or talk to him on the phone or via email?  She seemed surprised to find out Jake had been promoted.  Didn't anyone talk to her about what was going on while she was away?

    • Like 4
  10. On 2/7/2024 at 5:00 PM, I Want My MBTV said:

    More sister and less assistants made this episode enjoyable for me.

     

    Agreed.  He could send the assistants away permanently and it would be even more enjoyable.  

    • Like 3
    • Applause 2
  11. With only two more episodes, the various storylines are beginning to come to a resolution, so all the questions we have - e.g., what was going on at the convent?  what are the artist and his mother involved in?  -  are beginning to get resolved, so as the plot thickens, things also start to make sense.

    The scene where Gabrielle and the others shot her husband was wonderfully noir.

    • Like 1
  12. On 1/21/2024 at 11:05 AM, dubbel zout said:

    ...It would have been useful to hear why the jury voted the way it did. And I'm surprised the jury wasn't polled, but that was probably not considered for time issues.

    I know it's not part of the format of L&O to go into the jury room or discuss jury deliberations - other on those rare occasions when a defendant tampers with a juror - but it would be interesting to see why they came up with this decision.

    If the advisor was up against a murder charge, they wouldn't have had to poll the jury, because doesn't a murder conviction have to be unanimous?

  13. Yes, the "Aiden isn't good enough for Abbey," he's "too young" and for goodness sakes, he's not a lawyer seems like a nice set up not only to tick off the new judge because Abby has no impulse control in her response, but now to set up Abby with the lawyer she got to take on the fraud case.

    Abby is the least likeable character on this show and that isn't easy for me to say, with her father and her brother and her ex-husband all close seconds.

    • Like 1
  14. Another thing that I miss in most of the recent episodes is the DNA breakdown at the end of the show.  It's flashed in a tiny shot at the end, but too small to make out.  

    As has been mentioned by others, I'd love to know when a guest has followed up and contacted relatives that hadn't known about.  I recall we've learned when this was done a few times in the past.  Did Valerie, for example, contact her half-relatives?

     

    • Like 1
  15. While I loved the job they did with the In Memorium, I think the "tribute" to the 75 years of the Emmys (or was it just TV) was badly handled.  The clips were too short, not enough programs were mentioned, and they didn't identify the programs as they whipped through.  And maybe less jarring juxtapositions between clips, like going from Lucy is having a baby to suddenly planes flying into the Twin Towers.

    • Like 3
    • Applause 1
  16. 2 minutes ago, wonderwoman said:

    note to the upcoming oscars:

    this is what a well done in memoriam looks like: a beautiful musical that didn’t detract from celebrating those who have passed, whose faces and names we could see and read.

    Exactly what I was about to post.  This is the most well done In Memoriam I can remember.  When they cut away to the musicians, they stopped showing the deceased, then stopped showing the musicians so you can see those who passed  when they returned to the In Memorian, rather than playing over each other.  

    • Like 6
    • Applause 1
×
×
  • Create New...