Jump to content

Type keyword(s) to search

CheshireCat

Member
  • Posts

    2.8k
  • Joined

Posts posted by CheshireCat

  1. On 4/22/2024 at 9:16 PM, CrazyInAlabama said:

    I thought a lot of European baking wasn't super sweet?   I think they just wanted to cause more suspense, and then send all four to the finale.   

    They aren't. 

    I wondered about the comment. It seemed strange because I doubt that Alex baked differently in any of the previous episodes. 

    On 4/22/2024 at 10:48 PM, Irlandesa said:

    Even though this is an American baking show, I think the three judges wouldn't say "no sugar" if it was just because it was less sweet than other items. 

    I wish we had been able to see all of his baking. Maybe he forgot the sugar? 

    If he made a conscious decision to leave out sugar somewhere, I doubt the result was different than in previous bakes. However, he could have forgotten the sugar. 

     

    With regards to Coachella, I think there's also the "other side". Mentioning Coachella but not other music festivals, it could be seen as an endorsement of one but not the others. (As I've read that Coachella is very particular about sponsorships, they may not like that any more than other music festivals probably would). 

    • Like 3
  2. 1 hour ago, Mimi said:

    The grooms were not wearing white so I don’t see the problem!

    Agreed. As far as I know, you're not supposed to wear white as to not to upstage the bride or groom when they wear white.

    • Like 1
    • Applause 1
  3. 1 hour ago, shapeshifter said:

    As they were arresting her we have this bit of dialog from arguably 2 unreliable narrators in the fraught situation:

    • [ISOBEL] Marina Kostova, you're under arrest.
    • You can't do this to me. I'm a diplomat.
    • Watch me.

    I doubt we'll revisit this and get closure, but that seems to be par for the TV course these days. 
    I think diplomatic immunity goes away if there's a murder
    — based upon my case studies at L&O's Hudson U,  
    — or was that something Adrian Monk said, and so only applies in California?

    No, it only "goes away" if the country the diplomat is a citizen of waives immunity. But I recently read that the US tends to request such waivers if the crime is serious enough so that the prosecutor would normally recommend charging the individual for the crime they committed were it not for diplomatic immunity. There are also different levels of who has diplomatic immunity when. (Eg, there are diplomats who can be issued traffic tickets but they don't have to pay, others who can't even be issued traffic tickets etc). It's apparently all detailed on ID cards diplomats get issued. I also read recently that US citizens don't have diplomatic immunity in the US if they work for a foreign embassy or consulate.

    I would imagine that being a spy complicates things, though.

    • Useful 2
  4. On 3/19/2024 at 7:55 AM, Frost said:

    Robert is American/Canadian.  Alex is French.  I think a number of prior comments are actually talking about Alex...but I could be wrong! 😄

    You're so right. I don't know what it is with this season but I can't keep the names straight. (Should be getting better now that there are fewer contestants, though).

     

    On 3/22/2024 at 10:23 PM, TVbitch said:

    Wow Duff still sounds stuffed up, poor thing. 

    I noticed that, too, and the strange thing was, he only sounded stuffed up during the second judging, not the first.

     

    On 3/23/2024 at 4:54 PM, Lois Sandborne said:

    Sure, but I doubt there was an episode or a time in Duff's actual professional life where someone called two hours before the event and said, "Yeah, the bride meant to tell you she really loves olives. Work that in please." 

    Even if that happened, more likely than not, he'd tell the customer that it's too late, the cake is nearly finished or being packed up for delivery or out for delivery.

    Additionally, any changes would change the price. At the very least, the customers would have paid a down payment at this point, if not the whole price, so I doubt that any baker would actually make any changes to a cake a couple of hours before delivery.

    Speaking of twists, I didn't see anything that looked like it might have been the twist in tonight's episode.

     

    28 minutes ago, mlp said:

    The cake was a failure but it was mostly Sabrina's fault.  She screwed up something she claimed to be really good at and then blamed the mess on "time" during judging.  I felt bad for Katelyn who was really trying to salvage the bake.  Sabrina needed to go.

    Judging from the pictures they showed, Sabrina is definitely really good at it. She would also have been right that it was a timing issue; she said the cake wasn't as cool as it should be and it's those things that mess up 3D cakes.

    What I think she should have realized is that the cake wouldn't have enough time to chill. Maybe, though, she thought they'd manage. 
    I wonder why they didn't make a sitting elephant. That way, they could have supported the head on the cake board.

    One other thing I noticed was that the rice cereals looked really dry. I don't work with them as I don't eat them and I've always found a way to make it work without them but I wonder if she could have used some more marshmallows, too.

    I agree that it was right to send her home, though. She was responsible and I felt like she acknowledged that, too.

    As far as the first challenge was concerned, with the exception of Nikki's, the doughnuts all looked very dark to the point where I wondered if they might taste slightly burned. Since none of the judges said they did, I guess they didn't. Still, I think that the bakers might have chosen to make the oil hotter than it should have been so that their pastries baked quicker.
    I was surprised that one of the bakers used Pate a Choux. I don't know if she had experience with that dough and frying but it's not something I'd choose.

    • Like 3
  5. 2 hours ago, Rammchick said:

    I think it's annoying when the brief is, make a dessert inspired by xyz, and then the judges say, I don't see that xyz.  No, you weren't meant to.  This is one of those damned if you do, damned if you don't things because you know someone would have gotten dinged if they'd been too literal with the bugs.

    I agree. I'm also not sure it's a fair challenge because making a dessert that is inspired by something is basically making modern art. Not everyone sees the same in modern art, so why should it be different for a dessert? Some see the inspiration, others don't. How do you judge that, though?

    Quote

    Also, Baked Alaska is supposed to be flaming -- brought to the table, doused in alcohol and lit on fire.  Not pre-torched. 

    As far as I know, it's a variation. Putting it in the oven, torching it and dousing it in alcohol are all acceptable ways to do it.

     

    4 hours ago, kathyk2 said:

    Robert could have asked one of the other contestants to describe a hand pie. American bakers have to bake pastries from other countries all the time.

    I believe a hand pie is also a foreign pastry. In this case, the terminology seems to be different, though, whereas I think that for many other pastries, Americans use the same word for the pastry as in the country of origin. (eg, Pate a choux).
    But you're right, he could have asked to make sure he got it right.

    • Like 1
  6. 1 hour ago, JudgeyMcJudgyPants said:

    So I make some pretty good pumpkin bread and some damn tasty chocolate mousse.  My Christmas cookies are good but certainly won’t win any decorating competitions (my gingerbread men looked like the red ninja turtle).  What I’m saying is-you’ll never see me on this show.  I watch it to see cool stuff and so far, I’m not! The decor is seriously lacking this season.  The igloo was the best and that’s not saying much.

    To be fair, it's really hard to decorate a cake with meringue and it's probably even harder when you don't have much time and are decorating in such a warm environment.

    With that said, I was underwhelmed by the decorations in both episodes this evening. The cocktail/bubble cakes looked great, some of the envelopes looked really good as well and a couple of the bugs desserts were good.

    Overall, I felt like the desserts the bakers did in the first two episodes were more impressive.

    The cakes from the first episodes all looked really good though. As in, once they were cut, they all looked well-structured and very appetizing.

     

    53 minutes ago, BookWitch said:

    I've never had or made a Baked Alaska. I thought there was more of a balance between the cake and the ice cream, not tiny cake then HUGE ice cream. 

    I've never made one either. I have a recipe in a cook book, however, the recipe seems to be for individual desserts and not a cake. But I googled because I was curious and the first pictures that popped up showed one layer of cake, a dome of ice cream and a layer of meringue about as thin/thick as icing would be at the sides and slightly thicker at the top. 

    Did they announce a twist in either episode today? I noticed the flags each baker had added to the baked Alaska and since they didn't necessarily fit with the theme of the cake, I wondered if that might have been the twist for that bake?

     

    40 minutes ago, kathyk2 said:

    I would have sent Robert home he didn't make a hand pie. His bug didn't look like a caterpillar.

    I have no idea what this kind of pastry would be called in French but is it possible he didn't know what a hand pie was and thought it just had to be a hand-held pastry?
    I don't think the first bakes count towards the elimination, so I think he was lucky. Likewise, Steven who didn't have much luck with his bug dessert.

    Generally, I kind of wish they would have continued with the two hour episodes, at least, for the first one of tonight when they still had ten bakers. Even I felt rushed by how rushed the judging was, especially for the first challenge. 😄

    • Like 1
    • Useful 2
  7. On 3/5/2024 at 9:15 PM, Ohmo said:

    I think they are giving the contestants more time It seems like they got 11/2 hours for pre-heats in previous years and 2 hours for the main heat.  This year, it's 2 and 2 hours respectively.

    On 3/6/2024 at 3:52 PM, Splashy said:

    They gave them 3 hours for the main heat. I remember because I was astonished that they gave them that much time!

    I'm happy they gave them more time. I still think a little more time for the second bake wouldn't hurt but it already makes a difference to have 3 hours for it.

     

    On 3/6/2024 at 4:20 PM, MoonKitty said:

    Three hours for the main bake and NO TWIST! I did not miss it in the least. Do they always just leave them alone for week one? 

    They may not be showing it. I remember that during one of the championships last year, we all thought that there was no twist and I believe one of the posters then found something online that there was and they had apparently edited it out or something along those lines.

    I wouldn't have remembered the twist if you hadn't mentioned it; I'm so with you. I didn't miss it at all.

    12 hours ago, Splashy said:

    Oh, another thing that bothered me: Tangerines are not a spring flavor. They are in season during the winter. I always eat them at Christmastime.

    Ok, a quick google shows most sources citing November - January, but one extended it to May. I still think of them as a winter flavor.

     

    Yes, you can get tangerines until well into spring but I know them as a winter flavor as well. I'd never associate them with spring. (I find spring tricky in general. The first strawberries come out in late May and carrot cake is popular for Easter but all the other berries are summer or late summer fruit as are peaches, nectarines and cherries and I can't think of anything else for spring).

    • Like 3
    • Useful 1
  8. With the exception of Michael's (I felt so sorry for him), I thought all of the first round desserts looked amazing. Some were a bit more spectacular than others but they all looked like restaurant desserts.

    While Sabrina's (it was Sabrina, wasn't it, I was doing something else while watching?) was one of the less spectacular ones, the dessert was rolled so cleanly and evenly and I thought the colors were appetizing, too.

    From the look of the dessert alone, I probably would have given the win to the baker who made the coconut. That was incredible, she even put some of the dessert in the top.

    I was really surprised by the winner of the cake challenge. It wasn't that the cake looked bad, it just looked rather simple in comparison. It must have tasted beyond amazing to have won.

    The waterfall cake was stunning! And I think it was even more stunning by the fact that she had originally wanted to do something else and then had to do damage control.

    I don't know if they changed the application criteria or if they are giving the bakers more time now but I feel like the talent of the bakers has gone up for the past few championships. I was really impressed by all of them.

    I also appreciated the constructive criticism the judges gave. Yes, Nancy did mention "it looks like spring" several times, still, she also said other things. I was pleasantly surprised by that as she normally doesn't give that kind of criticism or it's edited out of her criticism.
    I don't know if she's changed her approach or if that's due to the two hours but I actually liked that they had more time for the judging. The judging didn't feel like "blink and you miss it"; there was time for the judges to say more than one sentence and time to take in the cake. To me, the entire show felt a little calmer and less rushed and I wouldn't mind if it was always like that.

    • Like 12
    • Useful 1
  9. 1 hour ago, Gramto6 said:

    Dang! I missed it! I am still stuck in the old Tuesday night schedule...I need to mark Mondays on my calendar for a while until I get used to it!!

    If you have a US TV provider, the last five episodes are available on the CBS website. 🙂

    • Thanks 1
  10. On 2/14/2024 at 3:06 PM, blackwing said:

    Can somebody please recap what happened to Sam's wife?  I assume she is dead.  I know the L.A. show was cancelled/ended, but in the context of the show's universe, I would assume the NCIS office there is still open.  Did Sam leave the office, is he on some kind of extended leave of absence, etc?

    The show ended with Callen and Sam in Morocca, reconnecting with Nell, Nate and a former CIA agent looking for Hetty and yes, the office is still very much operational.

     

    On 2/14/2024 at 3:16 PM, Raja said:

    I gave up on  Los Angeles but I know Sam's wife was ex CIA and she was killed by someone after her husband. His daughter was a Navy fighter pilot and her crash became a case.

    It was actually his son, although, I don't remember if he was already a fighter pilot or still in training. He was cleared of being suspected of having sabotaged his flight and returned to either the military base or school.

    If memory serves, his daughter was still attending the naval academy an Annapolis when the show ended.

  11. On 2/16/2024 at 9:49 PM, Grizzly said:

    March 4!!!!!!

    I'd like to see them do a show of the Halloween, Holiday, Spring and Summer champions facing off. Call it Seasonal Wars? John and Jessie could co-host.

    I'd prefer to call it something along the lines of "Best of the Seasons" but I really like the idea. They had all of the past winners on Christmas Cookie Challenge this past season and they came up with some awesome creations.

    I would also enjoy seeing how they have grown as bakers.

    • Like 12
  12. 8 hours ago, scarynikki12 said:

    I liked those too, though I wish the one Quartet heroine had dealt with her obvious eating disorder. Nora was giving her a quirky trait but all of her eating habits were the same things people suffering from the disorders do when they don't want anyone to notice. I know another character asks her about it and she responds by saying she only eats the way she does because it annoyed her brothers, so there was some awareness on Nora's part but the character still came across as having an eating disorder. I do love the idea of a group of friends running a wedding/event planning business that showcases their different talents.

    It's been a while since I've read it and I don't remember the eating disorder. I'll have to go and re-read it.

    Yes, I think the group of friends running the business was one of the things that appealed to me. I also liked the dynamic that the author had created between the characters. They had a great kind of friendship and it felt true.

    One other Trilogy that I remembered that I enjoyed was the Key Trilogy.

     

    Quote

    I know I'm a broken record on this point but Nora's books are all centered on twenty and early thirty somethings. Movies based on her work would be perfect roles for young actors looking to make a name for themselves in the industry. Her work needs a producer champion like Shonda, Reese, or Margot Robbie.

    I don't know anything about Nora Roberts, so I have no idea about her as a person and I haven't read any of her recent books. (As much as I enjoyed some of her books, the newer ones that I read all started to read the same, so I stopped reading her). So, it's possible that her characters are more diverse by now. But in all the books that I've read, I remember only one LGBTQ character and he was a friend of a main character (and while I don't remember which book he was in, I remember I liked him and had hoped that the next book in the series would maybe be about him). To make a long story short, I think in order for her books to be attractive to someone like Shonda, Roberts would have to agree that the producer could make certain changes. If she were willing to do that (and as I said, I don't know anything about her, so it's entirely possible she would be) then I think you're right, they'd be perfect for young actors and actresses and it would be great if a big name producer bought the rights.

    Although, I feel like either Lifetime or Hallmark did use a plot or two from her books. I know Hallmark has Debbie Macomber movies and I believe she's an author, right? And there's a Chesapeake Series and I've meant to look that up to see if that's based on the Mariah Stewart books and I keep forgetting. But I thought that some time within the past two years, I'd seen an announcement for a movie based on a Nora Roberts book, too.

     

    • Like 1
  13. On 2/12/2024 at 3:01 PM, Bastet said:

    It's one of the few episodes I don't like, but I dearly love that award title.

    The cartoon character that is the woman whose grandson stole her gun is one of the many things that bug me about the episode, but my favorite moment of the entire thing involves her:  When she walks into the Murder Room and sees Sharon, Taylor, and Provenza standing together, she assumes the white guy is the one in charge.  Something that happens every day in real life workplaces, but is not often shown on TV.  And it's just there; nobody comments on it.  Many viewers will not even notice, and I always appreciate when writers accept that as okay and just trust the audience as a whole rather than hammering a point home. 

    I think Major Crimes did a lot of that and it's one of the reasons I loved that show.

    It's kind of contradictory. The show got so many things right with regards to how society views women and Rusty's attitude and his relationship with Sharon and then they treated Sharon the way they did...

    On 2/14/2024 at 8:07 AM, Chaos Theory said:

    I actually find Rusty being “annoying” kind of refreshing.  Too many adult oriented shows especially cop shows have whatever kids there are there for the sole purpose of being mirrors of whatever plot is going on.   So they are either perfect or trainwrecks.    Rusty was a fully drawn out person.  You understood why he was annoying.   But there was also some truly beautiful scenes with him.  I really liked the early scene where the team got Rusty’s father to sign away his parental rights and everyone signed as witnesses.    

    I also loved how Sharon responded. At the beginning, she was understanding and allowed him to be angry at her but then there was the point where she had enough. It felt natural and right.

    I also liked how she would often guide him by asking questions rather than telling him what the right or wrong thing to do would be. I think she demonstrated really good parenting.

    • Like 1
  14. 12 hours ago, helpmerhonda said:

    Is the new guy (Powell?) staying?

    I was also confused by Kellett's exit. At the train station. With one small suitcase. Is she not moving back to DC?

    I would imagine that she has some stuff left in the US. So, she would probably have taken the small suitcase with things she wanted to have immediately and the rest would have been in a container, waiting to be shipped back to the US.

    On 2/14/2024 at 11:17 PM, Snazzy Daisy said:

    Despite some shady things she’s done before, Jamie has complimented Scott perfectly as his number two. Who’ll be taking over that role now?

    No more office romance/hookup please. 😣

    I agree with both. I think she provided a perfect balance to Scott and she actually was my favorite character, so I'm kind of bummed she left. At the same time, I can't say I'm surprised. While she did provide a good balance to Scott, they also seemed to not know what to do with her after she and Scott decided to call it quits. Almost as if they had defined the character through her relationship to Scott only which is a pity.

    And yes, no more office romance, please. Although, I don't mind it per se, it simply seems that so many shows feel like they have to have characters hook up and they don't. There are a lot of good stories to tell without involving romance.

    • Like 3
  15. Quote

    Joey kicks things off with the first group date, where wedding bells ring and stakes are higher than ever; the first one-on-one date takes love to new heights; Joey discovers which women have the bravery and stamina for lasting partnerships.

    Air date: Jan 29, 2024

    • Like 3
  16. 19 hours ago, iMonrey said:

    For those in the know . . . how do they determine what the "levels" are? At first I thought a 4 level in spins was if they did 4 different changes of position but apparently that's not the case. And what determines a level 3 or 4 in step sequences?

    Short answer: the rule book 🙂

    The difficulty levels are determined by a combination of things. As far as I know, for spins depends on the spin position themselves (there are positions in which it is more difficult to maintain speed/rotation of a spin than others), how well speed is maintained, how many rotations there are and how many changes of position are included.

    For step sequences, it's the steps that are involved (like with spin positions, some steps make it easier to maintain or gain speed than others), depth of edge (at least for ice dance, I'm not sure about pairs and singles), change of direction and, I believe, change of height level, too. I'm not sure but I think if you include a step where you drop low on one knee then get back up and continue as if you never dropped down it raises the level. Kind of like the jumps that some skaters do after they've dropped down to one knee.
    For ice dance, how close two skaters are matters as well. Same for twizzles, by the way. The closer they skate together, the more difficult it is. And I think dance holds factor into it as well.

    I don't know if speed is a factor nowadays, too. I remember back when they first started with the new judging system, it didn't matter how fast you executed the step sequence. If the sequence was complex enough, you'd get the difficulty level (which led to some very slow step sequences).

    I may be missing some thing but I think that's generally it.

    • Like 1
    • Useful 1
  17. 47 minutes ago, shapeshifter said:

    Richard Castle would be so sad. It's a good thing he's not around any more to see this development.

    Can you imagine what he would have had to say about AI generating content. Everyone around him would never have heard the end of it 😆

    • Like 3
  18. I hardly agree with anything that was written and as shapeshifter said, did the author actually watch the show?

    As others have pointed out, cases are almost always unrealistic on TV, Alexis wasn't really involved in police business until that last season (which gave her a character and personality change anyway) and consenting adults can have casual sex and in the end, Castle was a lot more mature than he let on. It seems that the author of the article didn't quite understand that this was mostly a personality Castle portrayed to the outside and that's why we got the scenes at home where we were shown that there was a lot more to him than the playboy mentality he let the world see.

    The author does have a point about there not having been any development for the supporting characters. At the same time, that is how this show was structured. The show told Castle's and Beckett's story. The others were indeed just "supporting characters" and their stories only mattered in so far that they interacted with Castle's and Beckett's story.
    It's not right or wrong, it's just a matter of preference.

    I'm not sure what point the author is trying to make about the police procedural format. Yeah, the show was a mix of procedural and serialized. So what?

    I have no idea how realistic it is that a civilian would be involved in police investigations. I'm under the impression that they do use civilians. Not on such a regular basis, then again, this is TV and not a documentary.

    As far as Castle's and Beckett's relationship is concerned, the comment gives the impression that the author didn't actually watch the series again. Castle was not as immature as he let the world see. And Montgomery also said in season 3 that he had allowed Castle to stay with Beckett because Beckett could use some loosening up (paraphrasing). 
    I'm not sure why the relationship wouldn't be healthy especially since I think we're clearly shown how it comes to be and how Beckett gets to the point where she can admit that she's in love with Castle.

    The author does have a point with the last point they're making. Some of those obstacles were ridiculous and unnecessary and were the lazy way to do things.

    Interestingly enough, there was the same thing about Pretty Woman on German radio recently. Someone was looking at it through today's lens and just like this article, it sounded like the radio person didn't get the message either.

     

    • Like 2
  19. 19 hours ago, SilverStormm said:

     I managed to bake some gingerbread flavoured last minute Whoville-inspired cupcakes in time for NYE at least (I needed to do something cheerful!).

     

    So cute! But how did you get the large ones to stay upright? 😲

    • Like 1
  20. 45 minutes ago, EtheltoTillie said:

    That makes sense.  But I'm curious . .  . what do you do with things like butter?   If it says two sticks of butter do you actually weigh it? 

    Depends. When I'm in the US, I usually don't weigh the two sticks. Only if I have time, a stick that's not used up and feel like using it. I do weigh things like a stick and a half, though, even if there are measurements on the paper.

    In Germany, butter comes in 250 g "bricks", so most of the time you have to weigh butter. Since the metric system is based on numbers that multiply by ten, almost all if not all recipes use measurements based on numbers that multiply by 5 and increases happen by 25g. So, 75g of butter, 100g, 125g etc. If a recipe calls for something like 80g of butter, you'll likely find that it's translated and converted from another language and weirdly enough, you're hard-pressed to find a recipe that calls for something like 105g or 110g or 115g of anything.

    I have one cookie book that has a mixture of Imperial and metric measurements. For example, the butter is given in grams and most of the recipes in the book call for too much butter. I believe that's because one stick is 113g but the recipe calls for 125g. And 10g of butter (almost a tbsp which is roughly 14g to give you a visual) make a huge difference if the flour isn't adjusted accordingly. (My guess would be that they simply converted and translated the recipe but didn't actually try them out).
    Once I figured that out and reduced the amount of butter, it actually worked.

    • Like 1
    • Useful 2
×
×
  • Create New...