Jump to content

Type keyword(s) to search

Epeolatrix

Member
  • Posts

    401
  • Joined

Posts posted by Epeolatrix

  1. Dressing the house to serve the defense is the same thing as dressing the defendant favorably, like the Menendez brothers in their sweaters or putting nerd glasses on random college rapist. It's weaselly, but allowed as long as it doesn't change the material substance of a crime scene. There's a passage in Lawrence Schiller's book about the house being redecorated, and his insider dirt is supposed to have come from Robert Kardashian (says Dunne).

     

         All day Saturday, members of the defense team are hard at work establishing O.J.’ s African-American identity at Rockingham. Cathy Randa and Arnelle have worked hard on the project. Rockingham is now sparkling, the furniture arranged for maximum effect. O.J. wants a fire in each fireplace. A thousand dollars’ worth of flowers have been ordered. The American flag must fly on the flagpole out front.

         A nude portrait of Paula Barbieri vanishes from its spot near the fireplace in Simpson’s bedroom. There will be no pictures of white women in O.J.’ s bedroom. A silver-framed picture of O.J. and his mother goes on his bedside table.

         Justin’s homemade Father’s Day card tracing his tiny handprint and footprint still hangs on the bathroom door in Simpson’s bedroom. “Keep this and remember it, Daddy,” the card reads, “because when I grow up, you’ll see how small I was.”

         The white women on the walls have to go, and the black people have to come in. All along the wall on the curving stairway, pictures are taken down. Ditto for the photos of white women downstairs. A few pictures of white female movie stars are left near the bar. Simpson always surrounded himself with photographs of his friends. Rockingham’s walls, end tables, and shelves overflowed with them. The faces were overwhelmingly white. That’s not the way to please a jury dominated by African-American women.

         “We’ve got to have pictures of his family, his black family, up there,” Cochran says.

         Kardashian has photos enlarged at Kinko’s, then framed nicely. One is even carefully placed in the kitchen. The jurors won’t notice that they are color photocopies.

         We’re getting manipulative here, Bob thinks. He is embarrassed. Then he resolutely shoves the feeling aside. If the prosecution is too dumb to check the photos they took of those walls the day after the murders, it’s not our fault, he decides. If they can’t figure out that we’ll show the jury O.J.’ s proud to be a black man, too bad.

         Cochran wants something depicting African-American history. “What about that framed poster from my office of the little girl trying to get to school?” he asks.   

         Johnnie means Norman Rockwell’s famous 1963 painting, The Problem We All Live With, in which a black grade school girl walks to school surrounded by federal marshals.

         As the picture is brought into the house, Kardashian finds himself saying to no one in particular, “I think O.J. also had that painting. Some years ago. It’s probably in storage.” Now he feels better.

         They hang the framed poster at the top of the stairs, where the jury can’t miss it as they go up to Simpson’s bedroom. Everyone is pleased. This has little to do with a search for the truth. This is stagecraft.

    Schiller, Lawrence; Willwerth, James (2014-04-14). American Tragedy: The Uncensored Story of the O.J. Simpson Defense (Kindle Locations 7987-7994)

     

    Dunne by his own admission was gossipy and giddy about being the center of attention; it just happened to be a double homicide that put him there. When you read his Vanity Fair articles, it's constant name-dropping, bragging about where he went to dinner, and knowing who did what with whom before it hit the papers. That scene didn't strike me as wrong other than he wouldn't have shut up when a server came by. Servers give him some of his best gossip and he prized those relationships for their usefulness.

    • Love 15
  2. According to some of the jurors (whose book I read), the question wasn't "did he do it", the question was "did the state prove it". At least a couple of them did think he was guilty, but that was a moral determination. They felt they had to apply the law as it was explained to them, based on allowable known evidence (we knew things they didn't), and to them it meant reasonable doubt.

    I'm not sure all their doubts were what I'd think of as reasonable, but it wasn't this simplistic racist/classist/ageist anti-Nicole anti-LAPD vote.

    • Love 6
  3. The juror book I remember best is "Madam Foreman" by Armanda Cooley, Carrie Bess, and Marsha Rubin-Jackson. The San Francisco Gate newspaper has an excellent review of the book, saying "these three jurors from the O.J. Simpson trial offer a point-by-point analysis of evidence that should at last settle the question flummoxing observers from both sides: What in heaven's name were those jurors thinking?" Readers might still disagree with the jurors' thought processes, but it's an interesting book nonetheless. If you don't want to spring for the book, the SFGate article is a decent CliffsNotes version.

    • Love 3
  4. Amazon.com has a great Listmania for books about the case, with helpful notes as to the usefulness of each book.

     

    For "The People versus O. J. Simpson", my favorites are The Run of His Life : The People versus O. J. Simpson by Jeffrey Toobin and American Tragedy: The Uncensored Story of the Simpson Defense by Lawrence Schiller and James Willwerth. They seemed like the most informative and objective, although Toobin's book is full of snarky observations.

    • Love 6
  5. Anatomical summary from the autopsy report

    I. Incised wound of neck:

         A. Transection of left and right common carotid arteries.

         B. Incisions, left and right internal jugular veins

         C. Transection of thyrohyoid membrane, epiglottis, and hypopharynx.

         D. Incision into cervical spine, C3.

    II. Multiple stab wound of neck and scalp (total of seven).

    III. Multiple injuries of hands, including incised wound, ring finger of right hand (defense wound).

    IV. Scalp bruise, right parietal.

    • Love 2
  6. He wasn't saintly or anything, but he was out of his spiritual and ethical depth in his zeal to support his friend. From all the accounts I've read, which came out around the time of the trial, he was genuinely religious and did struggle with his conscience about the case.

    I think the primary connection to the fame of his family is that the kids learned at an early age that being famous for virtually nothing was not only possible, it was awesome. Daddy now got them great seats in restaurants, Daddy was on tv all the time, and all Daddy seemed to have done was be friends with "Uncle OJ".

    • Love 7
  7. Likely reason AC was not charged for his role in the Bronco chase:

    "For one thing, a prosecution could stymie their efforts to gain access to Mr. Cowlings -- who can legally refuse to testify in any trial as long as he is a potential criminal defendant. A Cowlings prosecution also would take time and energy from prosecutors already racing to meet a speedy trial deadline in the Simpson case, and could give Mr. Simpson's defense lawyers access to discovery material and testimony that they might not otherwise be able to get in preparation for the Simpson trial, legal experts said."

    -http://articles.baltimoresun.com/1994-07-15/news/1994196155_1_cowlings-simpson-district-attorney

    • Love 9
  8. Then for people to say OJ'S blood was planted, well that would mean Ron's and Nicole's was also and that someone would have to take three vials and not get them mixed up and plant them just right and without getting caught.

     

    From what I've read, blood wasn't collected properly at the site, it was mishandled after collection, and there was a reasonable chance of cross-contamination. To get the blood of all three people onto a test swab could have been as simple as a tech not changing gloves or a damp sample being placed next to another sample.

     

    [NB: I think he did it AND I think the State screwed up its own case. The Defense did what it was supposed to do: protect their client from the State. ]

    • Love 5
  9. Jeffrey Toobin's book is really good, and I've just started Lawrence Schiller's. I'm at the point where Dr. Henry Lee is looking at multiple police photos of the same evidence but the pieces of evidence are in different locations in each photo. Which now makes me want to re-read all of Dr Lee's chapters on the case (he talks about it in a few of his books).

    • Love 2
  10. Although not penned entirely by a victim, a couple of books featuring survivors of serial or mass murder are Delivered from Evil: True Stories of Ordinary People Who Faced Monstrous Mass Killers and Survived by Ron Franscell and There But For the Grace of God: Survivors of the 20th Century’s Infamous Serial Killers by Fred Rosen. Each chapter of each book is devoted to a short case summary and an interview with a surviving victim and they are pretty interesting. Delivered from Evil is the better book, but if you can ignore the occasionally dickish observations of Fred Rosen, his book is okay, too.

    • Love 2
×
×
  • Create New...