persey
-
Posts
23 -
Joined
Content Type
Blogs
Gallery
Downloads
Discussion
Posts posted by persey
-
-
Best moment was the Dowager noticing the dust on the table top.
Daisy needs to shut up about the Drewes' farm and instead learn to say, "That's not my job."
-
2
-
-
I'd far rather see naked Mrs. Hughes than naked Carson. Just saying.
-
If you've ever experience High Tea in London, you'd know that it was more than just schneckins. You start off with tea sandwiches and other savories and move on to the sweets, including scones with clotted cream and freshly made strawberry jam. And I'm not talking miserly tiny treats, but very well made and substantial sandwiches---of course with no crusts, lol.
High tea is a working class meal; it's essentially supper. Substantial and with meat, if the family budget can afford it. The upper class meal of dainties is either just tea or afternoon tea.
-
5
-
-
I didn't understand her distress over the miscarriage. If I were facing life imprisonment or possible hanging, a baby would be the last thing I would want. I'm so sick of those two.
Maybe that was Anna's cunning plan. She couldn't be hanged while pregnant ("pleading her belly"), so she was crying because she'd swing sooner than she'd hoped.
-
4
-
-
Cora, Rose, and Lady Sinderby all wore tiaras at dinner on the first night at Brancaster. Are tiaras only worn by married women?
Yes. That includes widows.
-
3
-
-
Cora runs off with Bricker and Robert divorces her. In the meantime, Mabel Lane Fox dumps Tony at the altar because revenge is a dish best eaten cold. She and Robert get married because he can always use more money and she still wants a title. She gives birth to an heir.
Gregson returns from Germany (it wasn't his body) and it turns out he was never married, which is why no one knew about it. The magazine was saddled with debt and he just wanted to offload it while he explored the sexual delights of Weimar Berlin. Laughs his head off at the notion he could have been seriously interested in Edith.
-
1
-
-
Recall that Germany invaded Poland in 1939, which immediately led to France, the UK, and the UK's dominions such as Australia and Canada to declare war on Germany. Is Blake headed off to disappear like Gregson did?
He's going for one year, not fifteen.
-
4
-
-
Chiming in - yes, Mary dealt with the repercussions of the potential Pamuk scandal for years, and that was down to Edith. While there was antagonism between them before Edith wrote the letter, Edith escalated that situation from sniping and "meanness" to potentially life-ruining. Nothing Mary has done to Edith, before or since, is on a comparable scale. And now, Edith's choices are conditioned because she's afraid of Mary's response? Well, that's of her own making.
Edith is so busy being sorry for Edith that she's willing to sacrifice anyone to making up for her own poor choices. Somehow, that fits her perverted idea of "justice." Sure, put your name on the birth certificate, just in case you want to change your mind or your situation changes. Other people's rights or emotions? Feh. The daughter she purportedly dotes on? Not as important to Edith as Edith.
-
4
-
-
Since it seems increasingly obvious that Tom will end up with another Crawley sister, I'm forced to ship Tom and Mary. He's far too nice to end up with the whiny, self-pitying and entitled "kick 'em to the curb once they've served my purpose" Edith.
If you started to list ridiculous plot contrivances and urealistic anachronisms on this show, you'd be typing until tomorrow, but I can't see Robert's being so accepting of Edith's bastard being raised with his heir and his adored Sybbie. It will hurt them, and especially Sybbie, who's already got to overcome the chauffeur father and papist taint.
What I cannot believe, really cannot believe, is that anyone could think yet another murder plot involving the Bateses could have any interest whatsoever. And what are the odds that both people in a married couple would be arrested for a murder they couldn't commit? If I were a Bates, I'd start buying lottery tickets, get those fantastic odds working in my favor for once. And by the way, I'll call foul if it turns out Anna did it; because if she did, she couldn't have worried that Bates did.
.
-
5
-
-
The key moment in which Edith's personality was revealed in all its revoltingness was when she said she had put her real name on Marigold's birth certificate in case she needed it. What she was saying in that phrase was that despite months to commit to the plan, or any plan, she was going to keep her options open and use others as placeholder parents until she could make up her mind, no matter the cost to them. No matter the devastation she would cause to others, she would sacrifice them to her goal of having everything, and she decided that in advance.
I have no sympathy for Edith. She's got that covered and she has no sympathy for anyone who might be affected by her actions. Mary was right about her all along.
-
6
-
-
I doubt sincerely any of that would have happened. Gregson left England willingly with the avowed intention to become a German citizen. If anything most people would have said "good riddance" and forgot about him.
We know there were investigations into his disappearance; Robert referenced them. Moreover, he still owned a publishing concern in London and his business would have wanted to find him. Gregson most definitely intended to return to London to live and work once he got his divorce, German or not. It was his livelihood. And the cover story for his trip was that he was a tourist. The only person who knew his intentions was Edith.
It is impossible that all this could have gone on, plus an obit and probating his will, without referencing that he had a wife.
-
3
-
-
One of my problems with that speech is that being engaged to a married man was flatly impossible in the context of the 20s. It just wouldn't compute with people. An understanding, perhaps, but of necessity informal. In an age of breech of promise suits, an engagement was a serious matter.
At some point, everyone will have to know Gregson was married when Edith took up with him and why they don't know now (investigations of his disappearance! news coverage of a major figure!) is beyond me. When they do find out, Edith will come across as even more stupid and immoral than she does now, in 20s eyes.
-
1
-
-
The best moment was surprisingly indirect, given this show. Tom's calling Larry Merton the worst word he could come up and it's "Bastard!" as everyone at the table does a virtual faint. Yes, Edith, this is what's in store for your idolized Marigold and you'll have done it to her.
Hate Edith. Her dismissal of Mrs. Drewe was appalling. Now I only want to see a story line where she decides to run the magazine herself and in three months it's bankrupt and Edith's destitute. Heh.
And speaking of Mrs. Drewe, whyever should she be quiet? Unless the Crawleys threaten her and her family with eviction if she talks, and I wouldn't put it past them. Pferhaps her distinterested love of Marigold will cause her to take the high road. I hope she engages in a litle subtle blackmail, though.
Finally, it's lovely that Robert is so accepting of having a Jew in the family, given his reaction to having Sybbie be baptized a Catholic. Well I remember his smelling-a-dead-fish expression when he had his picture taken with a priest!
-
5
-
-
I have to take issue with the statement that Edith "couldn't think her way out of a paper bag." She she got her position at the magazine in the first place because of her insight, before Gregson had lain eyes on her. After their relationship developed, it also seemed clear that he was giving her some education into how things were run, at least in preparation for his absence. And hasn't she been de facto in charge since Gregson's disappearance? It's not like it's Daisy taking over The Sketch.
Gregson's been gone for over two years and it's obvious Edith hasn't turned into a media mogul as she's moped at Downton, nor during her pregnant sojourn in Switzerland. And the insight that lets her knock off her co!umns is not nearly the same thing as business acumen.
-
3
-
-
I'm dreading the possibility of my most disliked soap-trope of all time: when someone with no education and no experience and who heretofore couldn't think her way out of a paper bag, suddenly steps up to run a business successfully. I hope Fellowes doesn't try to pull that with Edith. That said, I would think Edith might have a cash flow problem in the short term; surely what she's saved from her allowance and whatever she gets paid for her column won't support setting up a long term living arrangement in London, complete with toddler.
In the long term, once Gregson's will is probated, everyone must discover he was married - although how no one seems aware of it yet is beyond me. Poor Bertha!
-
1
-
-
No, Mrs Drewe turned her away because she was becoming a stalker, that sequence of events was laid out from the start. We were plainly shown that she was calling in not occasionally, as would be normal of a rich person taking an interest in a child, but on a daily basis. While there she fawned over the child while ignoring everyone else. She stayed for hours, preventing the family going about their business. She refused to stay away even when told it wasn't convenient. None of that is normal behaviour for anyone, least of all a grand lady who is merely taking an interest in a promising child.
And the way Edith would show up at tea time and the whole family had to leap to their feet! Mrs. Drewe may be one of those, shocking I know, who resent the bowing and scraping and kowtowing to their betters. One of those whom Daisy called the future.
So, here's a scenario: Mrs. Drewe divorces Mr. Drewe for his infidelity with Lady Edith and marries Tom.* Then Marigold and Sybbie get raised together as stepsisters.
*Hmm, won't work unless she also gets an annulment in the Catholic Church. Oh,, well. .
-
The boys did (poor little things, I think they went to boarding school from the age of 7!!). As far as I know the girls had governesses and - if the parents cared for their education - later went to grammar school.
The upper classes didn't go to grammar school. Grammar school was for the smart middle class and the very exceptional working class individual.
-
I seriously wonder if part of the reason we can debate so endlessly on some of these topics is because the writing is just so terrible that everything is left up to us to decide -- until suddenly along comes the writer to muddy the waters all over again in the name of allegedly clearing them.
I'm thinking here of Sarah Bunting and Tom. It seemed pretty clear that he barely tolerated her, and I never saw any indication that she was keen on him, until BAM! She has loved him!! She wishes she had met him "before"! Daisy thinks they should be (have been?) an item! It just wasn't there for us to see at all. Part of what I have to train students to do is to find the evidence in the text for their conclusions. This guy doesn't even give us the evidence, we have to make it up for ourselves. To me, it just reeks of lazy, lazy, lazy writing, leaving everything vague until he decides which way he's going to go, even if no groundwork has been laid. It's not that there's a gun in Act 1 that never goes off -- rather, a gun goes off that we've never seen before. I'm sure there's a more succinct way of wording all this, but my goat is so got right now, I'm almost incoherent.
I used to be quite worried by Sarah Bunting. I hated her so much and she was so awful and Tom deserved so much bettter.... And then I realized that the way she was written, to be so entirely obtuse and obnoxious, meant that she really wasn't meant as a serious love interest for Tom, but just as a red herring. I slept easier after that, and last night my reaction was more, "Finally!", rather than, "Thank goodness!".
So my wish is that JF would be more subtle and not telegraph plot points in that manner. I'd like to be surprised, just once. Along those lines, I was really, really hoping that Ccra would decide to give Bricker a tumble, just because it was unexpected. Alas, 'twas not to be.
-
2
-
-
Illegitimacy in the 20s isn't nearly as big a deal as it would have been 20 years earlier.
That doesn't mean it wasn't still a huge deal. Through the 1950s, pregnant girls would be packed off to homes for unwed mothers and give up all rights to their babies, forever, because of the stigma. It's why Jack Nicholson and Bobby Darin, to name two celebrity examples, grew up thinking their mothers were their older sisters. It was a huge shame. People tried to hide it. Adoption papers included new birth certificates. it reflected badly and most unjustly, on mother and child. It was a big deal, which is why everyone who knows has counseled Edith to conceal it and put it behind her. The choices might have been between bad and worse, but that's the way it was.
-
11
-
-
Mrs. Drewe is one fatal pig farm accident away from being exactly in Ethel's shoes. Should something happen to Mr. Drewe, there is no Plan B for Mrs. Drewe and her children.
She'd never exactly be in Ethel's shoes. Her children are legitimate, she wasn't dismissed without a reference, her husband had a tied farm on the Downton estate and Granthams wouldn't see her destitute. An easy life, no.
-
3
-
-
I'm in entire agreement with helenamonster about Edith's selfishness and never considering what is best for Marigold. I also agree that the taint of illegitimacy is not being given sufficient weight. There was no life for Marigold at Downton with her legitimate cousins.
I'm also about to go all Sarah Bunting. I'm rather appalled that so much emphasis is being given to the material advantages that Marigold is missing. Edith had them and she's been miserable her whole life. Being brought up in a loving working class family is not a dire fate. And there's a huge difference between the Drewes' situation and Ethel's. Ethel was starving; she really did have no good options. Edith's had a lot of options, but she keeps changing her mind and isn't happy with any of her decisions, because, as has been mentioned, she wants it all. She needs to grow up. Grownups make hard choices and do without a lot they'd like. Yes, she'll be sad some of the time. Welcome to the world, Lady Edith.
-
12
-
S06.E03: Season 6, Episode 3
in Downton Abbey [V]
What happened to Tom is yet another instance of Fellowes' going for the cheap emotional payoff by means of character assassination.
He was written out so we'd get the heart-wrenching parting, but brought back presumably as the endgame for Mary. But when he left, Tom no longer had a reason to go; he had a interesting and responsible job, was loved and valued by the Crawleys, and even knew how to wear dinner clothes. And having gone, he goes all maudlin and turns on a dime to return and upstages two people at the major event of their lives, but we get the joyful reunion scene, down to the cousins' hug.
So for two transitory moments of cheap feels, Tom has been turned into a jackass.