Jump to content
Forums forums
PRIMETIMER
Pete Martell

SuperNormal: Public Appearances, Tweets, Media And Other Social Media Of The SPN Cast

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, tessathereaper said:

The press release said "The first story we tell..." so I think the idea may be to do a different story each season.  Like one season of Mary and John, the next season focusing on something else, they probably haven't decided yet so that's why they wouldn't mention it.  Or maybe they wanted to see how much they could come up with for John and Mary before deciding how long that story would last.

Oh an Anthology show? That would be cool, maybe then I could still get my Rufus/Bobby spinoff. 😁

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post

Just now, Morrigan2575 said:

Oh an Anthology show? That would be cool, maybe then I could still get my Rufus/Bobby spinoff. 😁

When she said "The first story we tell..." I took it to mean the first show that Chaos Machine is producing.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Just now, gonzosgirrl said:

When she said "The first story we tell..." I took it to mean the first show that Chaos Machine is producing.

Oh, bummer😂

Share this post


Link to post
Just now, Morrigan2575 said:

Oh, bummer😂

LOL, I have most certainly be wrong before. :)

Share this post


Link to post
15 hours ago, gonzosgirrl said:

When she said "The first story we tell..." I took it to mean the first show that Chaos Machine is producing.

That could be it too, but I think if it's successful, it would be natural to do other SPN stories too.  You don't do all that work and then go "John and Mary is enough" I don't think.

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post

1 hour ago, Myrelle said:

I love them.

So much. 🥰

Me too! 😍

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post

Danneel posted on Instagram a picture of herself with some Mantra product going for a run a couple of days ago, tried to post here but file was too big or something.  I didn't think Danneel was the sort of person who went for runs!  Jensen also liked Jared's post of him in their pool with the children, so they are interacting with the Padalecki's on SM.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
On 6/25/2021 at 8:43 PM, Myrelle said:

Ah well, my bad, but still not down the road from the Padaleckis any longer, right?

They sold that house, I believe.

How do we know that they sold their home?

Share this post


Link to post
On 6/28/2021 at 1:33 PM, tessathereaper said:

The press release said "The first story we tell..." so I think the idea may be to do a different story each season.  Like one season of Mary and John, the next season focusing on something else, they probably haven't decided yet so that's why they wouldn't mention it.  Or maybe they wanted to see how much they could come up with for John and Mary before deciding how long that story would last.

 

On 6/28/2021 at 6:55 PM, Morrigan2575 said:

Oh an Anthology show? That would be cool, maybe then I could still get my Rufus/Bobby spinoff. 😁

I agree an anthology series would be fun, but I don't think Jensen's "The first story we wanted to tell" comment was about the first story in The Winchesters.

From Deadline:

 

Quote

Before Sam and Dean, there was John and Mary. Told from the perspective of narrator Dean Winchester (Jensen Ackles), The Winchesters is the epic, untold love story of how John met Mary and how they put it all on the line to not only save their love, but the entire world.


This the context for the "The first story we wanted to tell" comment:

 

Quote

“After Supernatural wrapped its 15th season, we knew it wasn’t over. Because like we say in the show, ‘nothing ever really ends, does it?'” Jensen Ackles told Deadline. “When Danneel and I formed Chaos Machine Productions, we knew the first story we wanted to tell was the story of John and Mary Winchester, or rather the Supernatural origin story. I always felt like my character, Dean, would have wanted to know more about his parents’ relationship and how it came to be. So I love the thought of having him take us on this journey.”

 

In other words, Chaos Machine's first story will be a Supernatural/Winchesters origin story.

It still could turn out to be an anthology, but the "we" in that comment wasn't talking about which story they wanted The Winchesters series to tell. It was talking about this series being the first story i.e. production out of their company.

Edited by General Days
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post

Further comment states it's for Batman: The Longest Halloween. Oh boy. 

edit:

 

Edited by shoetingstar
  • Like 6

Share this post


Link to post
1 hour ago, General Days said:

 

I agree an anthology series would be fun, but I don't think Jensen's "The first story we wanted to tell" comment was about the first story in The Winchesters.

From Deadline:

 


This the context for the "The first story we wanted to tell" comment:

 

 

In other words, Chaos Machine's first story will be a Supernatural/Winchesters origin story.

It still could turn out to be an anthology, but the "we" in that comment wasn't talking about which story they wanted The Winchesters series to tell. It was talking about this series being the first story i.e. production out of their company.

Yeah like I said "I THINK, MAYBE..."

Share this post


Link to post
9 minutes ago, tessathereaper said:

Yeah like I said "I THINK, MAYBE..."

Right...

I replied because the quote you offered in support of that maybe was in reference to the production company's first story, i.e. the series itself, not the first story in the series.

I'd still like an anthology, though. I'm willing to give whatever they try a chance. I'd like to see them succeed.

Share this post


Link to post
2 hours ago, Diane said:

How do we know that they sold their home?

After the Architectual digest tour, they started posting pics from with a background that looked nothing like the lake house.  

So while there is nothing to state outright they sold it, it makes sense. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
26 minutes ago, ILoveReading said:

After the Architectual digest tour, they started posting pics from with a background that looked nothing like the lake house.  

So while there is nothing to state outright they sold it, it makes sense. 

I thought I read somewhere that someone looked it up. That it was public knowledge that anyone could look up, although I can't recall where I read it, but yes it was after the pics of them in the middle of another move came out, I believe. 

Share this post


Link to post

At minute .59 they start talking about the J2 tiff but what I thought was the most interesting part was the explanation of the private jet.

 

Share this post


Link to post

Nice that they don't mention Jared's hateful tweet to Robbie. Even they see how transparently mandated the makeup tweet was. It's also sad that they are taking their 'facts' from Twitter.

The depths of my disdain for Jared over this knows no bounds.

  • Like 12

Share this post


Link to post
5 hours ago, gonzosgirrl said:

Nice that they don't mention Jared's hateful tweet to Robbie. Even they see how transparently mandated the makeup tweet was. It's also sad that they are taking their 'facts' from Twitter.

The depths of my disdain for Jared over this knows no bounds.

And they also assumed everything Jared said was true and didn't give any benefit of the doubt to Jensen, so he was the only villain.  (And the "mandated makeup tweet" seemed to imply that Jared was forced to say it, while he was still the injured party, so he comes out the victim again.)

This is/would be just a minor fuss, but unfortunately, for those who don't know Supernatural or anything about the boys (which seemed to include the whole audience there) it's what they're going to take away after the details are forgotten:  Oh, the Supernatural guy.  Isn't he the one who screwed his friend?  

  • Sad 6

Share this post


Link to post
1 hour ago, ahrtee said:

And they also assumed everything Jared said was true and didn't give any benefit of the doubt to Jensen, so he was the only villain.  (And the "mandated makeup tweet" seemed to imply that Jared was forced to say it, while he was still the injured party, so he comes out the victim again.)

This is/would be just a minor fuss, but unfortunately, for those who don't know Supernatural or anything about the boys (which seemed to include the whole audience there) it's what they're going to take away after the details are forgotten:  Oh, the Supernatural guy.  Isn't he the one who screwed his friend?  

That show was fascinating on many levels. First I was surprised that there were so few fans there but considering the audience they may have been people who gave up the show a long time ago. The second interesting thing is getting some non-fan views from people who actually know the business and the CW in particular. I think Smith got some of the facts wrong or has some office talk type information. I don't think Jensen owns the plane with Jared. I thought the plane was Jared's but he let the cast and crew use it. But the fact that he got if for the Con's (and that it basically paid for the plane) is interesting. It also wasn't great that Smith seemed to get his information on John (and the situation in general) from Twitter. Twitter is not reality and the reason everything fell apart is because Dabb and crew thought it was. The biggest thing for me was how quickly they recognized the bump in the road tweet was from PR or the CW and not Jared. It never even occurred to me that could happen but it makes sense. I did think someone stepped in the night of the controversy and told everyone to fix the mess but the fact PR could have written Jared and Jensen's tweets adds a new aspect to all of this. 

I don't think this mess makes Jensen look like the bad guy. Looking at this and watching the John Campea show's take, it looks like the consensus is it's very weird that Jensen is doing this without Jared but Jared was just as much to blame by putting this all on twitter and not picking up a phone to straighten it all out. 

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post

From what I've seen and read, amongst the adult audience(and the more adult-minded), Jensen has more support than JP, who seems to have the wincesters and the tinhats(those fans who think that J2 are secretly a couple and the wives are beards) and the fringe element of the bi-bro fandom(those fans who, in their own minds, can't separate the actors from the characters they played on the show) in his corner.

Personally, I don't feel that Jensen would be hurt one iota by losing the segments of the fandom following JP. 

In fact, I think he'd be far better off in numerous ways since from the hate they're still spewing, it seems like they never ever really were truly his fans at all, excepting in what he could do for and with JP, and again, I feel like Jensen is really doing JP yet another favor by saying very little.

Come what may, I think JP has far more to lose in all of this than Jensen, so in the end he'll wind up hurting himself more than anyone else, which is usually what happens eventually with people who exhibit the patterns of behavior that he's shown.

JMO going off of a similar type of experience with a loved one. 

Oh, and the show reminds me of every other clickbait rag out there that gets their "facts" from Twitter. 

 

Edited by Myrelle
  • Like 6

Share this post


Link to post
2 hours ago, Myrelle said:

From what I've seen and read, amongst the adult audience(and the more adult-minded), Jensen has more support than JP, who seems to have the wincesters and the tinhats(those fans who think that J2 are secretly a couple and the wives are beards) and the fringe element of the bi-bro fandom(those fans who, in their own minds, can't separate the actors from the characters they played on the show) in his corner.

Personally, I don't feel that Jensen would be hurt one iota by losing the segments of the fandom following JP. 

In fact, I think he'd be far better off in numerous ways since from the hate they're still spewing, it seems like they never ever really were truly his fans at all, excepting in what he could do for and with JP, and again, I feel like Jensen is really doing JP yet another favor by saying very little.

Come what may, I think JP has far more to lose in all of this than Jensen, so in the end he'll wind up hurting himself more than anyone else, which is usually what happens eventually with people who exhibit the patterns of behavior that he's shown.

JMO going off of a similar type of experience with a loved one. 

Oh, and the show reminds me of every other clickbait rag out there that gets their "facts" from Twitter. 

 

I think both Jared and Jensen have long since resigned themselves to all the hate they get from fans. It is a drama that becomes a  feeding frenzy constantly looking for a bone.  No one ever "wins" those feuds.

I agree that the two guys didn't know anything about SPN or the fans (sounded like only 2 people in the audience ever even heard of the show). Which is why I didn't pay a lot of attention to that part. I just thought it was interesting that Creation bought them a plane.

 

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post

6 hours ago, Lastcall said:

Twitter is not reality and the reason everything fell apart is because Dabb and crew thought it was

Ain’t that the truth 🙄!

  • Like 1
  • Sad 2

Share this post


Link to post

Nice to see Jensen promoting his Batman movie. Not sure what that second tweet though, lol. 

  • Like 6

Share this post


Link to post
1 hour ago, gonzosgirrl said:

Nice to see Jensen promoting his Batman movie. Not sure what that second tweet though, lol. 

I just posted it because it had a picture for those not on instagram.  

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post

So he's wearing the hat from the studio in Austin. Does that mean he's back? Finally?

Edited by Casseiopeia

Share this post


Link to post
1 hour ago, Casseiopeia said:

So he's wearing the hat from the studio in Austin. Does that mean he's back? Finally?

No.  The person has location tagged as Toronto, Ontario. 

Share this post


Link to post
2 hours ago, ILoveReading said:

No.  The person has location tagged as Toronto, Ontario. 

Thanks. I thought I read that last day of filming was last week.

Share this post


Link to post
Just now, Casseiopeia said:

Thanks. I thought I read that last day of filming was last week.

No.  Filming doesn't end until September.  Kripke said they are in month 5 of 7. 

Share this post


Link to post
Just now, ILoveReading said:

No.  Filming doesn't end until September.  Kripke said they are in month 5 of 7. 

Oh wow. They aren't even close. Poor Jensen. He has 2 more months before he can go home!

Share this post


Link to post

I swear he looks weird in that pic. Is it just me? Like it looks like him but not. I'm puzzled..

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post

1 hour ago, catrox14 said:

I swear he looks weird in that pic. Is it just me? Like it looks like him but not. I'm puzzled..

I thought the same thing.  He looks thin and really tired. 

Share this post


Link to post
1 hour ago, catrox14 said:

I swear he looks weird in that pic. Is it just me? Like it looks like him but not. I'm puzzled..

I think it's the selfie angle.  His chin is narrower than normal and jawline is foreshortened.  I don't know about the woman with him, but she also has an oddly narrow jaw and very wide cheekbones.  

 

Share this post


Link to post
6 minutes ago, ahrtee said:

I think it's the selfie angle.  His chin is narrower than normal and jawline is foreshortened.  I don't know about the woman with him, but she also has an oddly narrow jaw and very wide cheekbones.  

 

She looks the same in her other instagram pictures.

Share this post


Link to post
35 minutes ago, Casseiopeia said:

She looks the same in her other instagram pictures.

Maybe the angle is aimed at her and Jensen, being taller, is at a different (odd) angle.  

All I'm saying is that his chin and jawline don't look like they usually do, which makes him look a little weird.  

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
21 minutes ago, ahrtee said:

Maybe the angle is aimed at her and Jensen, being taller, is at a different (odd) angle.  

All I'm saying is that his chin and jawline don't look like they usually do, which makes him look a little weird.  

That could be. I thought his face looked kind of flattened. I legit thought was a manip at first lol.

Share this post


Link to post

His facial bone structure looks slightly out of whack in the pic. Neither weight loss nor tiredness would account for that so IMO it is the angle of the pic.

  • Like 2
  • Useful 1

Share this post


Link to post

I think its a filter.  His freckles are gone. That's probably why he looks  bit of. 

  • Useful 2

Share this post


Link to post
3 hours ago, ILoveReading said:

I think its a filter.  His freckles are gone. That's probably why he looks  bit of. 

My first thought was a filter, because he is missing wrinkles that he would have with that kind of closeup.

Share this post


Link to post
1 hour ago, 7kstar said:

My first thought was a filter, because he is missing wrinkles that he would have with that kind of closeup.

  Maybe that's why her also face looks a little unreal?  But doesn't his neck look thin too?

Share this post


Link to post
7 hours ago, catrox14 said:

I swear he looks weird in that pic. Is it just me? Like it looks like him but not. I'm puzzled..

No, it's not just you. He looks pretty thin compared to the recent pics that we've seen of him with the cast of The Boys. 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post

Neither look natural, it looks like someone alter the photos because it isn't a natural even proportion of their body. 

Which is why I thought it was a filter but it reminds me of photos where they altered the original for photos that went on magazines but instead of making the subjects looking better it made them look weird. 

It's not a photo that I would save of Jensen.  Not sure why they did it.  It doesn't make either look great.  Most of the time Jensen is very photogenic. 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post

I know that's Jensen but, to me, it looks almost like Jared. 🤷‍♀️

Edited by Anywhoo

Share this post


Link to post
2 hours ago, 7kstar said:

Neither look natural, it looks like someone alter the photos because it isn't a natural even proportion of their body. 

Which is why I thought it was a filter but it reminds me of photos where they altered the original for photos that went on magazines but instead of making the subjects looking better it made them look weird. 

It's not a photo that I would save of Jensen.  Not sure why they did it.  It doesn't make either look great.  Most of the time Jensen is very photogenic. 

I think this girl is just a fan that wanted a picture with Jensen. I don't think either one really cared how they looked.  Most fan pics are fans with star struck grins while either J is stooping down trying to fit in the shot.

Mostly Jensen looked really tired.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
On 7/17/2021 at 12:48 PM, Casseiopeia said:

She looks the same in her other instagram pictures.

She doesn't really, she looks far more "plastic" in the picture with Jensen, for some reason she put a really heavy filter on it.

Share this post


Link to post

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...

Customize font-size