All Points Bulletin: All Things Media And News!

[wknt3]

35 minutes ago, wknt3 said:

This isn't really a comparable situation. There was nothing public and it wasn't the series lead engaging in the bad behavior. I do think that you are right that the show is toast since it was already borderline and was losing one of the best parts of the show and this kind of story isn't really conducive to getting lapsed and new viewers to check out the show, but I don't think it means immediate cancellation, since the network was almost certainly aware of the situation when they made the decision to renew it even if they want to pretend that they weren't.

23 minutes ago, break21 said:

Except now that she's gone public they are going to have to do something.  They might have thought they could handle it privately and give a settlement to stay quiet.    At the least they are going to be under pressure to fire Hawley.  

I'm surprised they would try and protect the hair department.  They would seem to be easily replaceable.  

I agree that it's quite likely they bring in a new showrunner and announce they are taking this very seriously and always had planned on taking serious action and in no way are they doing this just because it's public now. And that this show is doomed. But unless it comes out that Nathan is personally involved it's not an instant cancellation situation and more of a "the show is toast, but we're going to let it play out" thing.

I don't think that they tried to protect the hair department, it's more that Hawley and the network execs didn't take the situation seriously and couldn't be bothered taking real disciplinary action until it became an actual assault situation. Which is sad and frustrating, but unfortunately entirely believable given the voluminous evidence of this kind of thing happening all the time for quite awhile now.

[newyawk]

Crazy Days and Nights has a blind for this. Someone narrowed it down to Shawn Ashmore (Lopez's uptight lawyer boyfriend).

[marihunc]

9 minutes ago, newyawk said:

Crazy Days and Nights has a blind for this. Someone narrowed it down to Shawn Ashmore (Lopez's uptight lawyer boyfriend).

There were two recurring actors in the finale, Shawn Ashmore and Michael Beach. Ashmore didn't have scenes with Afton, Michael Beach did.

Edited August 4, 2019 by marihunc
actors, not characters

[Loandbehold]

3 hours ago, wknt3 said:

This isn't really a comparable situation. There was nothing public and it wasn't the series lead engaging in the bad behavior. I do think that you are right that the show is toast since it was already borderline and was losing one of the best parts of the show and this kind of story isn't really conducive to getting lapsed and new viewers to check out the show, but I don't think it means immediate cancellation, since the network was almost certainly aware of the situation when they made the decision to renew it even if they want to pretend that they weren't.

True. Look at Bull. Even after a huge settlement w/ Eliza Dushku, the show is coming back this fall. Sure, the ratings are better than The Rookie, but the network will look at this pretty much strictly as a business decision. ABC didn't think the show could survive Roseanne's statements. CBS made the opposite choice, and for this show, ABC is currently following suit. 

[Snapdragon]

Dang it!  Bishop was my favorite character and with both her and the chief gone, I'm not sure how good the next season is going to be.  Ugh, I just feel like every new show I like either gets cancelled after one season or loses an actor/showrunner, which causes the entire thing to fall apart.  

[WendyCR72]

Yeah, well, I thought this show was done the minute it was announced it was being banished to Sunday, a.k.a. the day of massive football overrun. Yes, ABC doesn't have football that night. But the other networks do, and you can bet most of the eyeballs will be elsewhere.

This mess - and we are only beginning season 2 (!) - will just probably make it easier to pull the plug if/when it does not perform well on its new night. While Fillion is not at fault, isn't he an EP? I'm not sure if he will remain unscathed or not. Maybe he just has the title but no real value like other actors before him. But if he does have any power, this does not look that great for him.

Alexei Hawley, however, should be replaced.

[break21]

31 minutes ago, WendyCR72 said:

Yeah, well, I thought this show was done the minute it was announced it was being banished to Sunday, a.k.a. the day of massive football overrun. Yes, ABC doesn't have football that night. But the other networks do, and you can bet most of the eyeballs will be elsewhere.

This mess - and we are only beginning season 2 (!) - will just probably make it easier to pull the plug if/when it does not perform well on its new night. While Fillion is not at fault, isn't he an EP? I'm not sure if he will remain unscathed or not. Maybe he just has the title but no real value like other actors before him. But if he does have any power, this does not look that great for him.

Alexei Hawley, however, should be replaced.

It's definitely a mess - It made the Drudge Report - that's never good!

It amazes me how stupid Hawley is/was.  All he had to do was pass it off to HR and he would effectively be out of it.  Now, there's a good chance he will be fired and if not, the show is done.  No way this show can survive a change in night, loss of a major co-star and a racial/sexual harassment scandal. 

For now, I'll give NF the benefit of a doubt.  She doesn't say she went to him with the allegations (and if she did, I absolutely believe she would have put his name out there).  Unfortunately, even if was oblivious to the entire thing, he is the name of the show and he's going to take a hit.

[shapeshifter]

5 hours ago, newyawk said:

Crazy Days and Nights has a blind for this. Someone narrowed it down to Shawn Ashmore (Lopez's uptight lawyer boyfriend).

Link?

[wknt3]

2 hours ago, WendyCR72 said:

This mess - and we are only beginning season 2 (!) - will just probably make it easier to pull the plug if/when it does not perform well on its new night. While Fillion is not at fault, isn't he an EP? I'm not sure if he will remain unscathed or not. Maybe he just has the title but no real value like other actors before him. But if he does have any power, this does not look that great for him.

Alexei Hawley, however, should be replaced.

Nathan and his agent have EP credits because ABC bought this as a "package" based on Nathan being attached and Hawley's business relationship with the network. It's a way of giving them backend profit participation. Also the article states Hawley didn't tell the producers or formally report the incidents to the proper HR staff. So based on what has been reported there is no reason to believe that Nathan did anything wrong or failed to do the right thing. Of course that could change as more reports come out.

And yes Hawley should be replaced and never allowed to run a show again. There is now ample proof of managerial incompetence.

[femmefan1946]

Afton was one of the best characters on the show. I'm really disappointed the producers didn't stand up for her - especially in this Me Too era.

How dumb are these guys anyway?  She's a star on the show and they are recurring characters? Of the two singled out, both characters are easily replaceable. 

The hairdresser seems to be a white woman from Chicago. https://www.imdb.com/name/nm2421982/?ref_=ttfc_fc_cr47

[WendyCR72]

TV Line just posted another article: Production Studio to investigate sexual harassment and racial bullying. Too bad it took Williamson going public to do it.

[devilhalo]

10 hours ago, break21 said:

Wow.  Sounds like she reported it to Hawley and he didn't do anything.  I wonder if the guest-star is Nolan's room-mate.  I think she had some scenes with him towards the end of the season.

I can see ABC either cancelling it completely or replacing Hawley.  It also probably depends on how much Nathan knew or didn't know.  

She also talks about executive producers bullying her. Isn’t Nathan one of the EPs? 

Edited August 5, 2019 by devilhalo

[BlakesMomma]

54 minutes ago, devilhalo said:

She also talks about executive producers bullying her. Isn’t Nathan one of the EPs? 

There are about 8 other EP’s besides  Nathan and Michelle, who are likely a lot more involved in the actual production of the show. 

Its so unfair to everyone else to not name names in my opinion. 

[break21]

1 hour ago, devilhalo said:

She also talks about executive producers bullying her. Isn’t Nathan one of the EPs? 

I think if Nathan was involved she would have named him.   She is going after Hawley.  Have no idea what, if anything NF's role was.   She doesn't seem to be going after him.   I have a feeling he's an EP in name only and Union roles say she has to go through the Showrunner.  JMO.

[break21]

It's Over.

Wow.  Just Wow.

My head is spinning about how fast this all happened.  Word-Less.

gations-racism-sexual-misconduct-1202661122/comment-page-1/?unapproved=2582214&moderation-hash=0c4b44956b0abbf096bb131d8bd48875

[devilhalo]

57 minutes ago, break21 said:

I think if Nathan was involved she would have named him.   She is going after Hawley.  Have no idea what, if anything NF's role was.   She doesn't seem to be going after him.   I have a feeling he's an EP in name only and Union roles say she has to go through the Showrunner.  JMO.

She is saying executive producers. So it’s more than one or maybe all? They need to clarify if Nathan is involved or not. 

[WendyCR72]

1 hour ago, break21 said:

It's Over.

Wow.  Just Wow.

My head is spinning about how fast this all happened.  Word-Less.

gations-racism-sexual-misconduct-1202661122/comment-page-1/?unapproved=2582214&moderation-hash=0c4b44956b0abbf096bb131d8bd48875

Bad link. Just letting you know!

[newyawk]

8 hours ago, shapeshifter said:

Link?

https://www.crazydaysandnights.net/2019/08/blind-item-4-afton-williamson-blind-item.html

[bros402]

14 hours ago, newyawk said:

That sucks. She was to me, the ONLY interesting character and the best actor on the show. 

I wonder if the recurring guest star is the guy that plays Nathan's rich friend and landlord on the show.

The best guess I saw in the AV Club comments section was the guy who played Rookie West's dad.

[break21]

2 hours ago, WendyCR72 said:

Bad link. Just letting you know!

Sorry!   This is the one.  This has moved so fast  Wow.

https://deadline.com/2019/08/the-rookie-producer-eone-investigating-afton-williamson-allegations-racism-sexual-misconduct-1202661122/

[shapeshifter]

16 hours ago, newyawk said:

Crazy Days and Nights has a blind for this. Someone narrowed it down to Shawn Ashmore (Lopez's uptight lawyer boyfriend).

2 hours ago, newyawk said:

https://www.crazydaysandnights.net/2019/08/blind-item-4-afton-williamson-blind-item.html

Or, just as likely, NOT Shawn Ashmore (just based on this article).  But regardless of who the perpetrators were, were there also silent bystanders? Especially those who could afford to speak up?

ETA: Guest stars who would not have tolerated such behavior and who would have called it out were less likely to have been on set when it occurred (unless it happened all the time).

Edited August 5, 2019 by shapeshifter

[Waterston Fan]

Well, dang.... I liked her as Nolan's TO. 

[madmaverick]

This is very unfortunate.  I thought Afton and Bishop was one of the strongest actors/characters on the show.  I enjoyed her relationship with Nolan the most.  A big loss for the show.  And of course it is very wrong if Afton was subjected to inappropriate/unlawful behaviour in a work environment.  However, if something as serious as sexual assault really happened (her words), I think it is something that should be taken to the police or any other authority where there can be a proper investigation rather than trial by instagram.  The internet playing judge, jury and executioner isn't fair to all parties concerned imo, when we don't actually know anything beyond a general allegation from one party.  We don't know anything about any actual incidents, actual words and behavior, the context, any witnesses (surely there would be others in the hair and makeup trailer and at the wrap party) etc. etc.  I personally am not comfortable with throwing people under the bus as we do in this internet age when we don't know any of that. 

It does sound like Hawley handled the complaint very poorly when he didn't refer it to HR. Whether (he thought) the allegation had merit or not would be for HR to determine but he at least had the obligation to report.  Could Afton herself have gone straight to HR to get it addressed?

And FWIW, I do remember Nathan's Firefly colleagues sharing a story of how he stepped in when a male guest star was inappropriate with a female cast member.  Before people cast stones, remember we don't know what anyone knew what when and what actually occurred.

[jhlipton]

On 8/4/2019 at 8:40 AM, wknt3 said:

This isn't really a comparable situation. There was nothing public and it wasn't the series lead engaging in the bad behavior.

The showrunner was behaving in a deplorable (and possibly criminal) manner 

17 hours ago, WendyCR72 said:

TV Line just posted another article: Production Studio to investigate sexual harassment and racial bullying. Too bad it took Williamson going public to do it.

They're doing this after she already quit and any action they take won't benefit her at all.  So very wrong.

[shapeshifter]

2 hours ago, jhlipton said:

They're doing this after she already quit and any action they take won't benefit her at all.  So very wrong.

Having left the show should make it psychologically and emotionally easier to follow through with the legal wrangling than if she was still under contract. Fortunately she's already done a couple of other projects since season 1 wrapped
— kind of like how I'd feel a little less awkward seeing my ex and his wife at my daughter's wedding if I had my own boo. 😉

[Jaded]

Afton Williamson IDs The Rookie Actor Who Allegedly Sexually Harassed Her
 

Edited August 6, 2019 by Jaded

[WendyCR72]

I applaud Ms. Williamson for her bravery. However, while I completely support her naming names (why should they be protected?), I do hope that does not put the kibosh on her acting career.

[Irlandesa]

8 hours ago, madmaverick said:

However, if something as serious as sexual assault really happened (her words), I think it is something that should be taken to the police or any other authority where there can be a proper investigation rather than trial by instagram. 

It depends on what the sexual assault was.  People tend to jump to thinking that it's something as serious as rape but things like groping/sexual touching are also considered sexual assault. And there aren't many busy police departments who would take that kind of assault seriously, especially if it takes place between people who know each other at a party or where there's drinking. And sexual harassment, like saying rude comments or asking out a castmate repeatedly isn't against the law.

It sounds like she blames the show runner the most. 

[jhlipton]

10 minutes ago, WendyCR72 said:

I do hope that does not put the kibosh on her acting career.

I fear that she's going to be labeled as "difficult".

2 minutes ago, Irlandesa said:

It sounds like she blames the show runner the most. 

As she should.  He's in charge and has a legal duty to report alleged offenses.  He can almost certainly be sued in civil court even if he committed no criminal act.

[Trini]

50 minutes ago, Irlandesa said:

And sexual harassment, like saying rude comments or asking out a castmate repeatedly isn't against the law.

It is according to the EEOC. But there are also state laws.

[Irlandesa]

6 minutes ago, Trini said:

It is according to the EEOC. But there are also state laws.

Sorry.  I should have thought it through more.  It's illegal but not necessarily criminal.

Edited August 6, 2019 by Irlandesa

[break21]

Deadline says she posted an instagram and named 2 people who she claims harassed her. . All I get it a hand with a butterfly ring. 

This entire thing could take a very different turn.  That was just odd.

[Jaded]

3 minutes ago, break21 said:

Deadline says she posted an instagram and named 2 people who she claims harassed her. . All I get it a hand with a butterfly ring. 

This entire thing could take a very different turn.  That was just odd.

Do you not see the her IG statement under that pic in my previous post?

[break21]

2 minutes ago, Jaded said:

Do you not see the her IG statement under that pic in my previous post?

No - please re-post or summarize.

1 minute ago, break21 said:

No - please re-post or summarize.

Saw it - it was absolutely bizarre.  Wow.   She needs help.  This did take a turn.

[orza]

7 hours ago, break21 said:

No - please re-post or summarize.

Saw it - it was absolutely bizarre.  Wow.   She needs help.  This did take a turn.

I don't see anything bizarre about her Instagram post that would indicate she needs help. It would appear Afton is quite emotional from the outpouring of support from fans. That's understandable. She also appears to be a spiritual person. Good for her if she can draw strength from her faith.

The only thing I find disturbing, albeit unsurprising, about all this is that we still have a show runner who is too stupid or too arrogant or too uncaring or too something to do the right thing when Afton came to him with a complaint.

[break21]

34 minutes ago, orza said:

I don't see anything bizarre about her Instagram post that would indicate she needs help. It would appear Afton is quite emotional from the outpouring of support from fans. That's understandable. She also appears to be a spiritual person. Good for her if she can draw strength from her faith.

The only thing I find disturbing, albeit unsurprising, about all this is that we still have a show runner who is too stupid or too arrogant or too uncaring or too something to do the right thing when Afton came to him with a complaint.

She apparently fired her agency.   I don't know.  It just seems like a very strange post.  But that's just me.  Make of it what you will.

[Badsamaritan]

3 hours ago, break21 said:

She apparently fired her agency.   I don't know.  It just seems like a very strange post.  But that's just me.  Make of it what you will.

I don't see in her post or any of the articles where she fired her agency. 

[madmaverick]

22 minutes ago, Badsamaritan said:

I don't see in her post or any of the articles where she fired her agency. 

I read it in this THR article. Maybe she felt they weren't representing her pov or her best interests.

15 hours ago, Irlandesa said:

It depends on what the sexual assault was.  People tend to jump to thinking that it's something as serious as rape but things like groping/sexual touching are also considered sexual assault.

And there aren't many busy police departments who would take that kind of assault seriously, especially if it takes place between people who know each other at a party or where there's drinking. And sexual harassment, like saying rude comments or asking out a castmate repeatedly isn't against the law.

It sounds like she blames the show runner the most. 

Yes, as a lawyer I understand that.  Sexual assault (at least in my jurisdiction) is when a person intentionally touches another person in a sexual way without the other's consent, and the person touching does not reasonably believe the other consents. 

Yes, the criminal justice system has many shortcomings when it comes to dealing with sexual offences.  But I believe it is important to report if you do believe you have been the victim of one.  

I just feel serious allegations need to be properly investigated for there to be due process.

It sounds like eOne appointed an independent third party to investigate.  Better late than never, I guess.  But I am confused as to how it seems the hairdresser accused of sexual assault/racial discrimination was fired even before the investigation is complete?  Also, I note that the hair department head seems to be a woman, though of course you can also have same sex sexual assault.  Or even without the sexual component, something can be simply assault.  If it allegedly took place at a wrap party (and the other stuff in the hair trailer), you would think there would be witnesses and it would not be just a case of (s)he said, she said. 

I don't know why Hawley failed to report to HR per procedure.  Maybe he thought he could take action to mediate or resolve it himself as showrunner (did he do anything?), maybe he feared any allegations would affect the show's renewal, maybe he thought it wasn't important and just tried to placate Afton.  Who knows.  But in any case, he seems to have handled the issue poorly. 

Edited August 6, 2019 by madmaverick

[break21]

1 hour ago, madmaverick said:

I read it in this THR article. Maybe she felt they weren't representing her pov or her best interests.

Yes, as a lawyer I understand that.  Sexual assault (at least in my jurisdiction) is when a person intentionally touches another person in a sexual way without the other's consent, and the person touching does not reasonably believe the other consents. 

Yes, the criminal justice system has many shortcomings when it comes to dealing with sexual offences.  But I believe it is important to report if you do believe you have been the victim of one.  

I just feel serious allegations need to be properly investigated for there to be due process.

It sounds like eOne appointed an independent third party to investigate.  Better late than never, I guess.  But I am confused as to how it seems the hairdresser accused of sexual assault/racial discrimination was fired even before the investigation is complete?  Also, I note that the hair department head seems to be a woman, though of course you can also have same sex sexual assault.  Or even without the sexual component, something can be simply assault.  If it allegedly took place at a wrap party (and the other stuff in the hair trailer), you would think there would be witnesses and it would not be just a case of (s)he said, she said. 

I don't know why Hawley failed to report to HR per procedure.  Maybe he thought he could take action to mediate or resolve it himself as showrunner (did he do anything?), maybe he feared any allegations would affect the show's renewal, maybe he thought it wasn't important and just tried to placate Afton.  Who knows.  But in any case, he seems to have handled the issue poorly. 

If true,, Hawley definitely dropped the ball.  Having said that, her latest statement was crazy.  No lawyer (I'm in law too - legal assistant - not a lawyer) would have let her publish that.   She opened herself up to defamation charges.  If you are going to go public, make it short, sweet.  The God stuff just makes her look unhinged. You can't publically charge someone with sexual harassment and talk about loaves of bread.   I can believe she dumped her PR team.  No way they would have let that statement out.

The crazy keeps coming with this story.  Doubt we'll know the truth until the investigation concludes.  This is nuts.

[madmaverick]

4 minutes ago, break21 said:

If true,, Hawley definitely dropped the ball.  Having said that, her latest statement was crazy.  No lawyer (I'm in law too - legal assistant - not a lawyer) would have let her publish that.   She opened herself up to defamation charges.  If you are going to go public, make it short, sweet.  The God stuff just makes her look unhinged. You can't publically charge someone with sexual harassment and talk about loaves of bread.   I can believe she dumped her PR team.  No way they would have let that statement out.

The crazy keeps coming with this story.  Doubt we'll know the truth until the investigation concludes.  This is nuts.

I didn't find her latest instagram post problematic.  She is entitled to express her feelings and reference her faith as she wishes.  If it were a victim impact statement in court, it's a perfectly valid one.  But again, we know no details of the allegations involved, so I'm not drawing conclusions about the guilt or innocence of any party.

[WendyCR72]

Legally, maybe it was unwise of Ms. Williamson to post something lengthy. But I see nothing "crazy" in her postings nor so I see any evidence that she "needs help". She is emotional. I think anyone in her position would be.

Now putting on my mod hat here. I am asking for such commentary to take a breather. Feel free to discuss what comes but I think it may be best to keep it in context to what is posted as this can go south otherwise rather quickly.

[jhlipton]

4 hours ago, Badsamaritan said:

3 hours ago, madmaverick said:

I read it in this THR article. Maybe she felt they weren't representing her pov or her best interests.

I don't see in her post or any of the articles where she fired her agency. 

From the article:

Quote

Sources tell THR that Williamson has fired her entire representation team, including her agents Gersh. [emphasis mine]

Ah, the ever-reliable "sources"...  The same ones who label any actress who dares complain about abuse as "difficult".  This is noted and dismissed.

[wknt3]

8 hours ago, break21 said:

She apparently fired her agency.   I don't know.  It just seems like a very strange post.  But that's just me.  Make of it what you will.

5 hours ago, madmaverick said:

I read it in this THR article. Maybe she felt they weren't representing her pov or her best interests.

That is quite likely. There are two possibilities, which are not mutually exclusive. One is that she felt that they did not do an adequate job in following up and ensure that her complaints were being properly handled. The other involves the process known as "packaging" in which shows are sold based upon a producer/showrunner and a star being put together as a package and sold in advance based upon business instead of creative concerns, which is controversial for a number of reasons (the writers have been most active and have threatened to strike over this, but a lot of actors, directors, etc. don't like it either) one of which is that agencies often receive a fee and/or profit participation as part of the overall deal and so are more concerned with the series' success rather than their clients' best interests. A quick bit of Googling shows that a number of the cast members share the same agency as her including the first announced co-leads so it is possible that they were part of the "package". If I was being assured that things were being taken care of and found out they had been swept under the rug while the people who are supposed to be representing me were taking money from the management that was ignoring the abuse I would be pissed, maybe not believe that they were in the dark too, and consider firing them as well. While we don't know for certain what the contractual relationships between the parties are it's a definite possibility, maybe even a probability, given what we do know.

Edited August 6, 2019 by wknt3
fixed typos and cleaned up phrasing

[break21]

5 hours ago, WendyCR72 said:

Legally, maybe it was unwise of Ms. Williamson to post something lengthy. But I see nothing "crazy" in her postings nor so I see any evidence that she "needs help". She is emotional. I think anyone in her position would be.

Now putting on my mod hat here. I am asking for such commentary to take a breather. Feel free to discuss what comes but I think it may be best to keep it in context to what is posted as this can go south otherwise rather quickly.

I apologize if I was out of line.  I do legal everyday and I can see a lot of red flags in her last post.  I was off the board for a long-time.  I will go off again. I apologize and I will show myself to the door.

[WendyCR72]

1 minute ago, break21 said:

I apologize if I was out of line.  I do legal everyday and I can see a lot of red flags in her last post.  I was off the board for a long-time.  I will go off again. I apologize and I will show myself to the door.

No need! We all have opinions. I just think - in such a case as this - it is better to go all Joe Friday and "just the facts" rather than assume issues that may - or may not - exist. Lord knows what has spilled out already is a mess.

Wonder if ABC regrets renewing now?

[Irlandesa]

8 hours ago, madmaverick said:

It sounds like eOne appointed an independent third party to investigate.  Better late than never, I guess.  But I am confused as to how it seems the hairdresser accused of sexual assault/racial discrimination was fired even before the investigation is complete?  

It sounds like the hairdresser was fired after the assault at the wrap party.  My guess is that whatever happened at that wrap party was clear cut and there were witnesses. An investigation wouldn't be needed before firing her in that case.

The current investigations might be looking into the claims of sexual harassment by the recurring guest star and, I suspect, how Hawley handled the official complaints. 

[WendyCR72]

From what I have read about Ali Larter's upcoming character, it is said she has a past with John Nolan. Another says she knew him in "his past life". Could she be the ex-wife, I wonder? (Probably not. Just a thought!)

[wknt3]

Speaking of the dangers of baseless speculation about the mess this show has devolved into, it's not just us random civilians on the internet getting in trouble -
https://popculture.com/celebrity/2019/08/05/adam-baldwin-slammed-comment-rookie-star-afton-williamson-quitting-alleging-sexual-harrassment-racism-bullying/

[SeriousPurrs]

Didn't NF ever talk to some one he's working with? Ever notice she's upset? Or does he only do his scenes and no personal chit-chat or try to be a friend? Just professional all the time?

Just IMO....

[Netfoot]

51 minutes ago, wknt3 said:

Speaking of the dangers of baseless speculation about the mess this show has devolved into...

Wow.  I thought the tweet (at least, as shown in that article) was fairly innocuous.  I don't know what the law has to say about "racial bullying" but surely "sexual harassment" is a criminal matter?