MysteryGuest October 29, 2017 Share October 29, 2017 26 minutes ago, catrox14 said: . Again, TO ME that's a writing choice that doesn't give either one the chance to actually explain their logical just to set up a big fight that is largely a false equivalency. Exactly. I think we're all in agreement that both Sam and Dean have valid arguments where Jack is concerned. It's just how the writers have them going about expressing those opinions that's bothersome to me. They have a lot more common ground than is being acknowledged, and it's frustrating to watch. I know we, as viewers, have the advantage of seeing both sides, and each brother doesn't necessarily have that in this fight, but I still think that after all of this time, and all of the misunderstandings, it would be easier for Sam and Dean to talk to each other. Basically, their positions are fine, but the writing isn't nuanced enough to make either one of them look great at this point. It was the same last year when Sam opted to work with the BMOL, and then didn't bother to actually discuss it with Dean. It made Sam look bad, and there was no reason to do that. The end result would have been the same if the writers had taken the time to have Sam actually explain his position rather than sneaking around. I'm just tired of the contrived drama between the brothers. Let the drama come from the monsters. 7 Link to comment
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.