All Episodes Talk: All Rise

[AngelaHunter]

1 hour ago, Cobalt Stargazer said:

It's considered a dietary supplement, so there's fewer regulations on it, but you can't OD.

Thanks for looking that up. I see it can interact badly with other medications. No mention of the side effects of taking it with heroin and meth. 🙄

1 hour ago, Cobalt Stargazer said:

Someone should be informed that one of the side effects is stripping down to your underpants and committing vandalism.

 That one is not listed. Time for an update!

As for his "suboxone" - I see that's used to lessen the symptoms of drug withdrawal, but it has one drawback - you can get addicted to it. Gee, Underpants Boy was really a mess. 

[CrazyInAlabama]

3 p.m. reruns, usually from 2015-

First-

Husky Custody Battle-Litigants lived together for about four years, she was a room renting tenant, and they got a Husky, Plaintiff teaches swimming lessons by the hour, and a second job.   Plaintiff had a baby( not the defendant's baby), lives with a roommate.   Plaintiff moved out, kept the dog for a year, gave the dog back to defendant for two years now.   Defendant also has dog's sire.   Plaintiff wants the Husky back, and claims months ago defendant assaulted her.    Defendant paid expensive vet bills, and dog had regular care under his ownership.   Defendant keeps the dog.   (Hallterview of plaintiff is sad, and she keeps says the dog is her daughter).  

Phone Stomping, and Face Punching-Plaintiff claims defendant was angry at him, and broke his phones.    Defendant claims man punched her in the face.   However, after the phone breaking, and punching they slept in the same bed together.   Then they had another fight either her roommate sister called police, or her parents who lived upstairs called, and defendant claims she punched him in the face.   Plaintiff was arrested, and charges were dropped.    Case dismissed. 

Second-

Mutual Combat Chaos-Defendant says his children's mother beat him up, while she sues him for a false restraining order.   Plaintiff claims it was mutual combat, but defendant says her cousin beat the daylights out of him.   Plaintiff is suing for him getting rid of her property.    Litigants have four children together, never married.   They moved into his house, and then he tossed her out.   When woman left she took three out of four children with her.    Plaintiff's case is dismissed for shouting out in court.  Sadly, oldest son has advanced cancer.     Defendant claims woman came back to his house, caused damages, and woman and three of her relatives invaded his house.   There is a mutual restraining order.   Also, a family court judge gave this woman majority custody of the four children.    

Plaintiff has no receipts for anything.   Cases dismissed. 

The Mailbox Made Me Do It-Plaintiff home owners are suing woman (car owner) for her minor son running over their mailbox.   Defendant driver claims mailbox was out in the street, and he avoided another car, and blames it all on the mailbox.   Defendant mother believes her son about what happened, and she wasn't even in town at the time (on a cruise).   Plaintiff have pictures showing his tires went on the curb and hit the driveway, when he hit the mailbox.     Defendant driver blamed the mailbox, and didn't mention another car.      $544 to plaintiff for mailbox replacement.   

Edited August 8, 2019 by CrazyInAlabama

[CrazyInAlabama]

5 p.m. episodes, both reruns from 2018-2019 season-

First-

Your Decease Mother Would Be Ashamed of You-Plaintiff woman suing family of deceased friend.    Defendant son refuses to give plaintiff her part of a trip that plaintiff, and his late mother were supposed to take together, and plaintiff had pre-paid.  Deceased mother did all of the planning, and reservations, and took payments.     Plaintiff claims she paid woman $4k.  Defendant claims payments weren't clear, and plaintiff won't explain (apparently there was a past history of loans, and payments from deceased mother to plaintiff over the years).    Defendant claims that there were five different amounts plaintiff wanted over the months.   Plaintiff claims she paid $4k, but only told her daughter $1200.   There were also some refunds to.  Not everything was refunded.   Plaintiff gets $4,000.    

Clueless Tenant-Plaintiff suing former landlord for moving costs, illegal eviction, and the usual.    Landlord counter suing for damages to the house.    Landlord sent letter saying that he was not renewing the lease at the end of the year lease period.    Plaintiff maintains that landlord has to renew his lease as long as plaintiff wants to live there.    Landlord says tenant was a total nightmare, and I see what he means.  Plaintiff's case dismissed.   Landlord returned security deposit, and check was cashed, but he maintains he found more damage, too late, so case dismissed. 

Second-

He'll Never Find Me in Egypt-Car sales goes wrong when vehicle goes missing, and a trip to Egypt complicates the deal.   Plaintiff paid defendant in full for car, and is suing defendant because car was stolen.  Plaintiff paid for car, and went to pick car up, and it was missing.  Defendant claims it was stolen, and later recovered.    Car needed some work (cracked windshield, rekeyed car, rearview mirror).  Defendant has put car into friend's name, and she went to Egypt, and friend got the car released by police.    Woman didn't repay the $3k, even though car had been stolen.    Defendant wanted car back, and signed a promissary note to repay man the $3k, and she didn't pay a penny.  $2250 to plaintiff. 

Oh No! Judge Judy's Making a Call-Plaintiff suing defendant for medical bill, and ruined credit score, after defendant's dog bit the plaintiff.    Plaintiff was picking her son up at defendant's house, when defendant's mother opened door so plaintiff could greet the grandchildren.    Dog bolted outside, and bit the plaintiff.     Defendant claims it was all plaintiff's fault, and so JJ call's defendant's mother to find out what she witnessed.  

Defendant's mother confirms the plaintiff's story.   The pictures of the plaintiff's arm damage are nasty looking.   Apparently, defendant sent nasty text messages to plaintiff.  Plaintiff receives $1500.  

[AngelaHunter]

1 hour ago, CrazyInAlabama said:

He'll Never Find Me in Egypt

What the hell? Plaintiff is a grown man who can't keep a license but wants a car to park in front of his place I guess. Or just to drive now and then, because it's okay to have no license if you only use the car occasionally, right? Def is either playing super stupid-dumb, or it's no act. And these characters walk among us. omg. Plaintiff bears no grudge at his friend scamming and ripping him off for 3K. 

1 hour ago, CrazyInAlabama said:

Oh No! Judge Judy's Making a Call

Then we had the def, the lying, insolent, foul-mouthed, dumb slob who is, of course, a SSMOT. Vapid sonny boy sits there with Mom. Don't any upstanding, moral, decent people have kids anymore? I just wish plaintiff had claimed 5K, so nasty Ms. Rat would get nothing.

[CrazyInAlabama]

3 p.m. reruns (usually about 2015, but these sound more familiar)-

First-

Dice Throwing Disaster-Plaintiff claims a visiting six year old (one of eight or nine kids being watched by her 13 year old daughter) is accused of causing $2000 in damage by throwing dice at a TV.   Defendant mother claims her kid didn't do it, and that she never saw the damage.    (From my experience, a flat screen can have internal damage that doesn't show until you turn it on).   The TV was a gift from a boyfriend, and a refurbished one is $350 (half price to plaintiff).  $350 to plaintiff.

Burning Down the Trailer-Plaintiff mobile home owner is suing a neighbor who started his RV at the storage place, and her trailer burned down.  The storage place is fenced, but not covered (Lake Havasu, California side).   Plaintiff never registered or titled the trailer in her name, and it was always on private property, no insurance either.   Trailer was purchased $2300, and plaintiff wants $4,000 for it,   Plaintiff just doesn't answer what JJ wants, and keeps trying to say it's worth a lot more than $2300.     RV was registered, and only went from storage to the camp ground.  Plaintiff registered trailer after the fire.   $1622 for plaintiff.    

Second-

Teenage Loan Sharks-Plaintiffs suing son's 18 year old friend for unpaid loans.   One loan was for car repairs, and the other loan was for jewelry bought by defendant, but put on plaintiff's son's credit.   Defendant was also giving car insurance money to plaintiff's son , and that cancelled out the jewelry money.     JJ calls the son about the insurance/loan. and son claims defendant never prepaid the insurance.   So defendant owes $185 for jewelry, and for car repair loan so money to the plaintiffs.

Sub-letters From Hell-Plaintiff apartment landlord rented room to defendants, and alleged damages by defendants.   Defendants say they received a notice that plaintiff owed back rent, so they stopped paying rent to the plaintiff.   Defendant didn't pay for January, and moved the end of the month (they owe $1,000).    There are pictures on move in, and as the defendants moved out.  There is a big hole in the wall, and the defendants hung a calendar over it.    Defendants are claiming for $3k for all rent back, and harassment.   $1337 to plaintiff.  

[CrazyInAlabama]

5 p.m. episodes, both reruns, 2018-2019-

First-

Roommate Meets Jail Cell-Three men were roommates, everything went bad.  Plaintiff is suing two ex-roommates/defendants for security deposit, and personal property he claims defendants trashed.     Defendants suing about lease breaking.   They moved into a four bedroom home.  Plaintiff gets his $1800 back for security deposit, and lease breaking (defendants didn't get replacement roommate).  Plaintiff gets his fridge back, and Kitchen Aid mixer.    iPhone 8 ($2,000!)   stays with the defendants.  Defendants get no lease breaking fee.  

Pushing, Shoving and Bleeding-Plaintiff suing ex-roommate for assault during an argument, plaintiff was renting room in defendant's house.  After move in, plaintiff claims defendant wanted security deposit, and other stuff, changing their agreement. There was a physical fight between the two women, and the police were called.  Defendant's claims dismissed, and plaintiff gets nothing also.    

Second-

Extreme Bullying and Life-Threatening Texts-Plaintiff is ex-live in girlfriend of defendant in his Las Vegas home.    Plaintiff alleges threatening texts by man, and she fled in fear of her life.  Defendant claims the plaintiff's 10 year old son repeatedly punched his 7 year old daughter.  There were six kids in the house, three for plaintiff, and three for defendant.  Plaintiff moved out leaving property (she lives in San Francisco now), and wants her beds and TVs back, but defendant says he bought the beds, and there we no TVs.     Defendant says she only left her clothes, and the kids clothes, but she never picked them up after repeated phone calls. So defendant eventually trashed the clothes.    

Plaintiff never sent her children to school for the four months that she lived with defendant.  and still aren't in school months after leaving defendant's house.     Defendant says his little girl finally told him about the plaintiff's son's physical assaults, and says the 10 year old was bullying his son, and when it was discovered, he told plaintiff to leave.    After defendant told plaintiff and her kids to leave, he claims the 10 year old was coming over to his house, and trying to break in.   Sadly, plaintiff looks like kid #4 is coming, and I hope that it's not the defendant's.  The kid with the plaintiff in court has a real issue with self control, and I'm surprised JJ didn't boot the kid.     By the way, I've ordered replacement birth certificates, and received them in a week, so keeping the kids out of school for months is ridiculous.   I hope the school authorities where the plaintiff is living now noted that her children aren't in school for months at a time.   Case dismissed. 

Edited August 9, 2019 by CrazyInAlabama

[AngelaHunter]

1 hour ago, CrazyInAlabama said:

Roommate Meets Jail Cell-Three men were roommates,

Ah, yes - "Stansbury's House of Hunks." Oh, and the wife of the shaved-headed def, who is very happy to share her home with this trio of misfits. What gets me is the married couple could have their own place, even if it had only one bedroom and not have to share it all and call the cops, etc, but I guess they want to tell people they live in a 4-bedroom house, even if they have access to only one of those rooms. I don't get it. Stansbury was going to get the money back for his damned shared iPhone, but then started rambling about airfare to Vegas or some such shit, and got the boot. Bunch of real winners. 

1 hour ago, CrazyInAlabama said:

Pushing, Shoving and Bleeding

More lunatic strangers bunking in together - middleaged ladies this time -  and ending up in physical altercations. Plaintiff really wanted JJ to know that "I'm stronger than her"(sic) and says it twice, implying that's the only reason she wasn't hurt more seriously, although she wasn't hurt at all. More weight behind her, yes, but I'm not sure about "stronger." Def. looked pretty tough. Let's have an arm-wrestling contest!  Byrd can referee. Nutty bitches.

[CrazyInAlabama]

3 p.m. reruns (usually 2015-2016 season)-

First-

Grandmother Glam Shots Scram-Grandmother suing ex-daughter in law for Christmas, and other glamour childrens photos, and 'family' picture of her ex-DIL's new boyfriend included with the kids, and ex.    Grandmother claims ex used her credit to have huge photo packages, and Christmas package, but she only authorized the first set of kid pictures, not the Christmas. 

Grandma authorized daughter, and ex-DIL to have kiddie photos taken, including the contest of prettiest kid photo for a lousy trophy.  It was just the girl grandkids who had the photos.  Grandmother claims she would pay $1,000 for photos, but not the $5800+ the bill ended up being.    The defendant thinks that former mother-in-law should be happy to have her new live-in included in family photos.   Grandma claims she only authorized $888, not the $5800+.   (This case, and the relationship between the plaintiff, her son, and the defendant sound awful).      (My guess is JJ is right, the DIL only did the one set of pictures for $868, and the daughter did the other pictures).   $433 to plaintiff.  (My guess is one reason for the delayed divorce from the military husband by the hopefully, ex daughter in law is probably to last for 10 years of marriage while husband is on active duty, then she can keep her benefits until she remarries, and go after his pension.     My guess if that happens, she will never remarry). 

Second-

Family Emergency Upset-Plaintiff purchased an old (1949 Plymouth coupe) car on Ebay, and paid for it.   Defendant sold the car three months later, and never returned the $5300 he was paid for the car $4500 for car, and $800 for repairs).          Defendant is paying Ebay back, and has paid about 75% so far.     Defendant claims ex-girlfriend and his daughter were attacked at knife point, and he left town to comfort them, taking the money with him.   Defendant also claims Ebay took the money directly out of his account, and then contradicts himself.    $5k to plaintiff. 

Cancer or No Cancer-Plaintiff suing former friend for unauthorized charges on her credit card.    Plaintiff allowed defendant to rent a car on her credit card, because he needed to go to doctor a lot for a 'cancer diagnosis', that is still pending a year later.  Rental car was $899, for two weeks.   A tree fell on the car during a storm (it was parked), and the car was kept longer than it was supposed to be before the storm/tree.    Defendant also kept money raised to support his 'cancer', on GoFundMe.   Defendant hasn't had any cancer treatments, and the first testing was over a year ago.      Plaintiff gets $900.

Prison Visit Crash-Plaintiff suing defendant for crashing her car while traveling together to visit incarcerated significant others.    The drove together to minimize expenses and driving duties.    Plaintiff wants medical bills, value of car, lost wages, and everything else under the sun.   Plaintiff gets $0, and deserves exactly that. 

Edited August 12, 2019 by CrazyInAlabama

[CrazyInAlabama]

5 p.m. episodes, both reruns-

First-

Repossession Roulette-A car travels between buyer and seller multiple times, after it is reportedly repossessed before one final payment can be made.  Plaintiff car buyer suing seller for repair costs, payments he made on car, and damages.  Car was $950, minus $550 down, and $200 for plaintiff's junked car.   Plaintiff called the defendant to arrange to drop off the last payment ($200) in the night drop box (it's a dealership of some kind), plaintiff didn't do the drop box.    Plaintiff didn't pay the $200, and car was repossessed by defendant,   Even though the plaintiff picked up the car next to the car dealer, he claims he didn't know where to take the money.   Plaintiff's phone does show longer calls. 

 Defendant also wants $5k for repossessing car, impound fees, and towing.    Car title still with defendant.   Impound fees were $255, plus $200 for car payment.    Plaintiff had the car for two months, and used it for a delivery service.    Nothing for either side, and defendant keeps the car.    

Second-

Arson Payback for Vet Bill-Plaintiff suing defendant (her daughter's ex-fiance) for setting her car on fire, and he's suing her for an unpaid loan.   Defendant says he didn't set her car on fire, and she never repaid the loan.   Defendant loaned money for vet bill for her dog, and he sold her collateral after she never repaid the loan.   Defendant received $300 for the property.  Witness for plaintiff is former friend/roommate of defendant, and claims he has recording saying the defendant slashed the tires on plaintiff's car.  

There is nothing on the audio recording on the witness' phone about the car fire, or anything else.    No police report, as usual.    Cases dismissed.

Spay and Neuter Your Dogs-Plaintiff suing former friend for unpaid loan.    Litigants were roommates, and car need repairs, and so defendant borrowed money from plaintiff for car repairs. $900.   Defendant paid back $460, but the credit cards have 29% each.  Defendant had a dog that she didn't spay, and used plaintiff's credit card for this also.  Plaintiff gets money, plus interest on both loans.  

Crime Victim's Funeral Plight-Plaintiff owes money to funeral director for son's funeral, and is suing him for funeral payment back, after her claim to a state crime victim funeral fund turns down her application.   Defendant is a funeral director, and is counter suing for the funeral costs she didn't pay.   Defendant has a signed contract for the funeral, and plaintiff claims she never signed it. 

Plaintiff claims defendant called her relatives the day before the funeral, and threatened that if no one paid the bills, son would be 'coming out of the casket'.   That's total bull.   $3,925 for funeral, with $1023 left on bill.   $1023 to defendant.   

[iwasish]

On 8/7/2019 at 12:20 PM, AngelaHunter said:

Thanks for looking that up. I see it can interact badly with other medications. No mention of the side effects of taking it with heroin and meth. 🙄

 That one is not listed. Time for an update!

As for his "suboxone" - I see that's used to lessen the symptoms of drug withdrawal, but it has one drawback - you can get addicted to it. Gee, Underpants Boy was really a mess. 

Melatonin is used for so much stuff. My vet advised me to give a very small amount daily to my dachshund. She was diagnosed with Dachshund Pattern Baldness, which left her with loss of hair on her ears, chest and back of her rear legs. It actually worked, her hair came back. I ran out of pills and never purchased  more. Her hair thinned out again, but not as much. Since it’s just a cosmetic thing, it doesn’t affect her health and I wasn’t comfortable giving her something  foreign for the rest of her life. But it did do the job!

[AngelaHunter]

2 hours ago, CrazyInAlabama said:

Repossession Roulette-

Musical cars and a plaintiff who has to buy an old beater for 950$ (and didn't pay the other 200$ owed) yet can afford to retain counsel for a small claims case. Plaintiff was a little peculiar. Def, who couldn't remember the BS he wrote in his answer, actually thought anyone on the planet would believe he spent 5,000$ to reclaim this old 900$ hulk of a car. That would make him the world's worst businessman. Both of them were nutty and exasperating. I wonder what the lawyer charged. 

4 hours ago, CrazyInAlabama said:

Family Emergency Upset-

This is precisely the case I mentioned the other day, about people naively sending off thousands of dollars to some total stranger on eBay. I can't believe people do that. The 4500$ wasn't enough, so the plaintiff merrily sends off another 850$. The def, looking like some bargain bin Wayne Newton, is a slippery, sociopathic con-man sleazebag, totally devoid of morals and decency, who no doubt makes a living scamming people. Even JJ was struck silent by his rehearsed, self-righteous and soaring orating. It was an awesome thing to listen to. I hope the plaintiff learned not to be such an easy mark, but maybe the saying about old dogs and new tricks is true.

[CrazyInAlabama]

3 p.m. reruns, usually 2015-2016-

First-

Daters or Debtors?-(They met at a fast food drive through, she worked there). Plaintiff suing ex-girlfriend for a series of unpaid loans, $1465 total.   They met at the drive thru, and then she came to his house, and then a week or so later she wanted a loan.   Now the story changes, first loan was for her moving expenses, second was for car expenses, and another was for a shortage at work she had to make up.   Defendant claims everything was a gift, including a check that she signed, and now denies was hers.   Woman never paid any money back, so he had no expectation of repayment.   Plaintiff was arrested for a misdemeanor, $300 bond.  Then he paid for a class so she could get a job, and she was expecting an income tax refund.    Why do people keep falling for the income tax refund scam?   $600 to plaintiff and that's it.   What a fool he is, and someday that woman's going to scam the wrong person.   

Slashed Tires & Jealousy-Plaintiff suing ex-girlfriend for slashing his tires.  They broke up, and one day he walks out to see his tires slashed.   Defendant really seems to think that was the right thing to do.  There is a witness, who saw the tire slashing.  The woman drives a silver Jaguar, that defendant drives, but plaintiff paid for, and it's still in his name.   Plaintiff $1200, and he needs to get his car back. 

Second-

Bait Shop Sign Slam-Plaintiff sign maker received $1,000 from the defendant, and no more money, and she also gave him a check that bounced.  There was no signed contract, but verbal agreement was for $1800 total. $825 to plaintiff.  

Flirting and House Painting-Plaintiff gave man money for painting equipment, in return for him doing more painting for her.   Painter claims it only became a loan after he turned down her advances.  $1200 for plaintiff. 

Pills, Horses and Gambling-Plaintiff exes are suing for unpaid rent, due to defendant's (alleged) gambling and pill spending, and her three horses.    There's a voice message from defendant acknowledging owing almost $900, and she can't recall why she would say that.   $800 to plaintiff.  (Defendant exits towards the side wall of the courtroom).

[AngelaHunter]

55 minutes ago, CrazyInAlabama said:

Plaintiff suing ex-girlfriend for a series of unpaid loans, $1465 total.   They met at the drive thru, and

It's always amazing to me. I have never in my life asked even my dearest friends to give me money, let alone someone I just met. I don't even have joint credit cards or bank accounts with my husband, yet we constantly hear about these morons putting some new boy/girlfriend on their CCs and bank accounts and making joint purchases of expensive items. Understandable if you're some 19-year old who thinks they're in love forever and ever, but we see this with people all the way up to elderly.  

59 minutes ago, CrazyInAlabama said:

Bait Shop Sign Slam

I remember that one. Def was despicable. Thank you CrazyInAlabama, for these stellar reviews so I know in advance what to skip.

1 hour ago, CrazyInAlabama said:

  (Defendant exits towards the side wall of the courtroom).

Too many pills? 🤣

[CrazyInAlabama]

5 p.m., both reruns, 2018-2019 episodes-

First-

Don't Mess With the Corvette-Plaintiff ex-boyfriend moved out, and claims harassment, but he went back to the house after threats.    He's suing for car damage, assault, and return of belongings.  Defendant claims she threw his furniture out a week after plaintiff left, so he's sleeping on the floor.  Defendant claims she set up appointments up with plaintiff to pick his furniture up months after he moved out, but claims she had thrown it out long before.   Car damages are thrown out, he shouldn't have gone to her house after the threats.    $1,000 to plaintiff.

Truck Facelift-Plaintiff suing defendant truck mechanic over a bad installation of a lift kit, and bigger tires, but mechanic had never installed a lift kit before.   Plaintiff paid $600 (half to defendant, and half to defendant's brother).    Bad things happened when lift kit failed, and he wants repair costs.   Plaintiff gets $300. 

Second-

Man's Fear of Large Dogs Comes Back to Bite Him-A young man bitten on the thigh by his roommates' German Shepherd/Husky moves out.  As usual, the dog owner blames the victim.    The plaintiffs blame it on the defendant, because he was warned the dog didn't like men.  Defendant moved out and is being sued for breaking the lease, animal abuse, and filing a false report.   Dog owner didn't mention the size of the dog until the lease signing, but didn't know the size and breed of the dog until move in.   Defendant says dog attacked him two weeks later, and dog bite his thigh.    

Plaintiff/dog owner claims it was a nip, and the defendant's fault.  Defendant gets away without paying anything, and plaintiffs get nothing.  

Gas Explosion Anxiety-(I remember these two, the defendant is seriously wacky).  Plaintiff planted a tree, between the driveways, and defendant chopped branches on her side of the driveway.   Defendant says the tree would eat into the gas line, and blow up the houses, so she chopped the tree on her side.    However, plaintiff says the gas line was relocated.   

Defendant also says the gas explosion threat made her nervous, made her dog nervous, and a bunch of other garbage.   Plaintiff wants $1169 to replace the tree, and she's not getting that either.       $1 to plaintiff.   (I'm so glad I didn't move to Phoenix where these litigants live). 

[AngelaHunter]

2 hours ago, CrazyInAlabama said:

Don't Mess With the Corvette-

That was new to me. That dumb, trashy girl with her stupid pink hair hanging across her eye was unbearable. She's got it all:  the hair, the brows, the nose ring, the lip piercing, the tats, and the fake talons yet can't speak basic English properly - "We was," "I seen", " me and my fiance went" - I would have loved to have seen her "fiance" who we know is not betrothed to her at all. Go back to 5th grade, you nasty, repulsive, stupid circus freak. 

2 hours ago, CrazyInAlabama said:

Truck Facelift-

Never saw this one either. The plaintiff might need an extra hydraulic lift to get him into his big,  giant truck because no way could he climb in without help. Byrd had to get between Tweedledum and Tweedledee, lest there be an Aweful Battle of the Chubbies. Should have let them go at it, Byrd. That would have been way more entertaining than listening to these motormouths blabbing about car parts. 

[DoctorK]

49 minutes ago, AngelaHunter said:

Go back to 5th grade, you nasty, repulsive, stupid circus freak. 

Don't hold back, tell us how you really feel. And I totally agree.

[AngelaHunter]

^^ Sorry. The humidity is making me cranky. 🤭

[Taeolas]

17 hours ago, CrazyInAlabama said:

Truck Facelift-

I'm really surprised JJ let him keep babbling on as long as he did. I'm sure the producer was behind the camera waving to keep dragging it out for more footage. Normally she's quick to tell them to shut up/shut off their mic and what not, but not only did she keep trying to explain why he only got the 300 back, she didn't say a peep about him talking over her. 

[AngelaHunter]

56 minutes ago, Taeolas said:

but not only did she keep trying to explain why he only got the 300 back, she didn't say a peep about him talking over her. 

Maybe it was too amusing, watching his face quivering and his stubby arms - with the suit cuffs down past his knuckles ( I guess he shops at "Big and Tall" but doesn't have the "tall" part) waving around to stop him.

[CrazyInAlabama]

3 p.m. reruns, usually 2015 or so-

First-

Moldy Daycare-Plaintiff accuses home day care provider of have a mold infestation.  Plaintiff is former tenant of basement apartment, and day care space, defendant is former landlady.   Defendant was going to have day care on first floor, and plaintiff tenant was renting garden apartment in house basement.     Plaintiff/former tenant says apartment is mold infested, and she had to trash mattresses, clothing, shoes, etc., and defendant claims tenant brought it in to the unit.  Plaintiff claims defendant changed the locks when tenant says she was going to move, and after some bizarre woman (defendant swears it was the plaintiff) was outside her house with some man right before move out.  Plaintiff claims all that she had in the apartment was her bed, and she was paying $1,000 for a place to store her bed.   $250 to defendant, nothing to bizarre tenant/plaintiff. 

How to Live to be 100-(According to JJ, a Gerontologist told her the secret to living to be 100, "Don't Fall").   Plaintiff/ older woman and granddaughter were walking down a public sidewalk, when a swarm of Chihuahuas came out of the yard, started nipping, and clawing, and lady fell down.   As usual, lying dog owner swears her dogs were not out, and didn't do it,   Her daughter that was home at the time, saw the plaintiff on the ground, but claims the little dogs were always in the fence, and didn't do it.    Plaintiff is only suing for her out of pocket expenses, and her glasses replacement that were broken.  Animal control came to defendant's house, and there were citations for too many dogs, and animals at large.  Defendant didn't put anything through her homeowner's insurance, and JJ thinks she doesn't even have insurance.    $2,000 to plaintiff. 

Second-

Disappearing Dog-Plaintiff suing former landlords for $1500 security deposit (landlords swear they only charged $500 security).   Defendant/landlords want pet deposit, but plaintiff says a dog was on the premises for only an hour, on one day.   $1,000 for pet deposit was not paid,  Plaintiff wants $1500 back, but $1k was pet deposit she never paid or owed.   Defendants allege plaintiff property was in house for almost a month, after she claims she moved out.  Case dismissed (plaintiff claimed her grandmother died September 1, but landlady claims grand mother died a week later). 

Divorce Drama-Plaintiff suing ex-husband.    Plaintiff moved in to take care of ex after a stroke (yes, another 'care giver').    The finally had a fight, he told her to leave, and she claims he moved another woman in.  (the children with ex have lived much of their teen years with grandparents, not plaintiff).    Plaintiff and her boyfriend came to the defendant's house, (in between boyfriend staying with baby mama).      Defendant says their oldest son came with a truck and picked all of her stuff up.   Case dismissed, because plaintiff is a big liar, and got bleeped in the hall-terview. 

Motorcycle Money Man-Plaintiff bought a motorcycle from defendant, and motorcycle has been resold by defendant to someone else.  Motorcycle was $14k total.   Plaintiff had paid $3300.   Plaintiff gets $3300.  

[CrazyInAlabama]

5 p.m. reruns, both from 2018-2019-

First-

Fractured Jaw at the Rodeo-( or as Byrd is the Word titled this one-"Brokeback Mountain 2: Where Did The Love Go?”)Plaintiff and defendant were camping at a rodeo, drinking was involved, and had a fight.  Plaintiff had his jaw broken by the defendant.   Defendant refused to pay medical bills, that have gone into collections now.  Plaintiff gets $3500 (Beau'd Hopkins, the defendant, never saw that name before).

A Pit Bull is a Stupid Dog to Have-Plaintiff  is suing sister-in-law for attack on six year old little girl, the plaintiff's step daughter, through step mother (I think that's the relationship, but I'm not sure).   Little girl was removed from court by Byrd.   Little girl has a huge facial scar.     

Plaintiff is 19 year old step daughter, living with 17 year old boyfriend, and 18 year old friend, and 22 year old stepson.      Defendant is being sued for child permanently scarred by defendant's pit bull.    Plaintiff was watching her sister, and dog attack happened in defendant's room on the little sister.   The sister's (plaintiff's) classic response to why she wasn't properly watching the girl, is "I didn't think anything would happen".   

Stepdaughter claims she told the stepmother there is a new, adult pit bull in the house, and stepmother says it's a lie, she didn't know about the dog.    The dog was the boyfriend's.    Why would any one with sense (stepmother) let a six year old go to stay with the 17, 18, and 19 year old fools  anyway?   Stepmother (plaintiff) claims she didn't know about the Pit Bull. 

Stepmother says the dog was a new addition, and there was a husky in the household, then the pit bull left, and was brought back.  The little girl was bitten in the defendant's (17 year old boyfriend) room.    As JJ says, stepmother/plaintiff hadn't been to the house for a long time, and allowed the girl to stay for the weekend with the fool step daughter.   Nothing for the plaintiff's, because it was her fault the child was there.    (With all of the people in this case, can their combined IQ even reach 100?   I don't think so). 

Second-

Fear of Miscarriage Doesn't Stop Dog Lover-Plaintiff woman has terrible taste in sperm donors, since she had one child with ex boyfriend, and is pregnant by him again.    She's suing the jerky ex over damage to an RV she let him move into after they split, and she wants her dog back.  Jerky ex filed for a restraining order, but didn't show up in court, and he wasn't in the country that day.   Plaintiff gets the dog back (it's outside court).   There is a restraining order in place requiring defendant to stay 100 feet away from plaintiff, and the dog.   Plaintiff went to pick up dog, and fighting started with defendant, police were called, she had pregnancy issues and went to the hospital.    After the hospital plaintiff saw her dog in another unlocked car, (with defendant and one of his idiot friends), they fought again, and she went back to the hospital again. (At least I think that's what happened, I'm not really sure).  RV looks disgusting, inside and out.     What a freak show this case is!   Plaintiff gets nothing, and deserves even less.  (Where did they get those dye jobs?  At Freaks R Us?)   Defendant gets nothing, and doesn't have the brains the Good Lord gave a chicken. 

Soul Food Sister Shuffle-Plaintiff and defendant were partners in Three Sisters, (there are three partners, two are plaintiffs)  plaintiffs are suing over proceeds from cooking/catering business.     They had a booth at a fair food booth.    Plaintiffs get their share, and the business is over.

(Tomorrow is the woman who says a cat isn't a pet, but an infant).  

[AngelaHunter]

Oh, Dave. Dave, Dave, you poor wooden-headed cuck. His big romance starts at Jack-in-the-Box, which is Amanda Ferguson's "place of employment." Amanda has a lot of problems, which I guess came up suddenly after she fell for ol' Dave. She went to his house twice and they talked on the phone or when he went to her place of employment for his brekkie sammie.

She brought him spaghetti. They ate the spaghetti, then Amanda gets into her tale of woe. She needs 600$ to move. I guess she just found out that day she was moving. Dave shells it out in the form of a check, which Amanda denies ever receiving even though she signed it and cashed it. That's how much of a shit she gave about you, Dave. Then, wouldn't you know, she needs money for her car registration/insurance or whatever. 400$, which I guess was also a surprise to her. Money, please, Dave. Sure. Dave is Sir Galahad with a checkbook. She pays back nothing, and can't even keep her job at the fast-food joint, so she needs Dave to fill her car with gas, pay for a class (so she can get a job and pay Dave back, she sincerely promised!) But, oops, poor Amanda gets nabbed by the cops and needs bail. "It was only a misdemeanor", she shrugs. No big deal, getting arrested. Naturally, she gives dear Dave a call to pay the 300$ to get her sprung from the slammer. Dave rushes to her aid and pays more money. She is definitely going to pay Dave back all the money she owes when (all together now) she gets her income tax refund. Gee, sorry Dave, she got it but told you she didn't and you believed that because you're a dingbat sucker such a nice guy. Dave only finds out she got it during this case. Dave gets back only 600$ because all the rest of the money he shelled out is his problem and punishment for his stupidity.

In the hall, poor dorky cucky Dave sings the praises of Amanda - how nice, and kind and sincere and honest she is even though he had to sue her to get what she owed him. A paragon of virtue is Ms. Ferguson. Dave, right now about a million women are scrambling to find out where you are.  I'm thinking of calling you myself. My car insurance is due in about 3 weeks and I'm strapped for cash because I lost my last job after I got arrested. Come to my rescue! I swear I'll pay you back every cent at tax time. Deal?

[CrazyInAlabama]

3 p.m., both reruns, about 2015-

First-

Rescue Chihuahua Chase-After a neighbor's dog attacks her Chihuahua, a woman demand compensation for the new fence she put up.  Plaintiff claims doctor bills, but has no human doctor bills to show.  Plaintiff took the dog to the vet, but she didn't go to the doctor, even though she didn't know about the rabies vaccine status of the defendant's dog.  Plaintiff also threatened to report defendant to licensing board for realtors.   Plaintiff wanted $1300 for fence, and threatened a CPS report against the tenant (he has two family foster kids, so they already have CPS oversight).    There is nothing in the vet report about a dog bite.   Case dismissed.       JJ also reassures the realtor/broker that the small town they live in will all watch the case, and know who the nut case is. 

Roommate Misfits-A former roommate is accused of skipping out on eight months of rent, property damage.  Plaintiff never tried to get a replacement roommate after defendant left.  Defendant is saying all kinds of nasty things about plaintiff, and plaintiff returns the favor.   There was a $75 cost to break the lease for defendant.       Case dismissed. 

Second-

Flooding Video Controversy-The judge takes issue with a video supposedly showing thousands of dollars' worth of damages to furniture and toys.   Plaintiff rented out with unfinished basement (not living space, just storage), and there were two floods, the first small, and the second a lot of water.   Plaintiff is suing for things like a living room set, TV, dining room set, and toys,  she put in the basement.  Plaintiff claims defendant was going to finish the basement, into living space (only if he put in egress windows down stairs).  Plaintiff simply won't shut up.    Plaintiff owed one month's rent, and then moved into a second house with the same landlord.  Plaintiff didn't have renter's insurance.   Plaintiff has bills only for the toys, and for the sofa when it was new.  (She claims she replaces her living room furniture once a year).  Why would someone buy a new TV, and put it on the floor in the basement.     Plaintiff is still in the same house, so it must not be that bad?   JJ must not know about living in snow country, or where there's a lot of rain, not putting the downspout extension down does cause flooded basements, or crawl spaces.    All of the toys I saw were plastic, and I don't see how they could be damaged.    $1130 to plaintiff, if she doesn't like the house, then MOVE! 

Edited August 14, 2019 by CrazyInAlabama

[CrazyInAlabama]

5 p.m., both reruns, 2018-2019 season-

First-

Child Abandonment-Plaintiff says she loaned former daughter-in-law money for a car, was a co-signer, and defendant abandoned the husband, child, and car.  Plaintiff wants the title signed over so she can sell it, and recoup some of the money.   Defendant says "I won't get any money", tough.  Defendant is counter claiming for payments on the car, or the car back.  (Bet the new boyfriend will pay the car off for her).    We don't know if the title was signed over, or not.  (Son / ex-husband is in the military, stationed in Arizona, so I doubt he could be in L.A. for the hearing).

Beamer Trap-Plaintiff suing former friend for toll charges, and damages, on a (2008 BMW) Beamer plaintiff sold to defendant.    Defendant had car for 14 months, and it would cost a lot to maintain, so he left the car at the dealership.    Defendant wants his payments, and extra $100 a month payment back, not happening.    There are before and after photos of the car.  I don't believe the tire was that shredded the entire time, the way the plaintiff says.   Also, apparently a tree fell on the car. Estimate for fixing the car (from the tree) is $2800(Something naughty is going on, since the plaintiff's estimate is in the hands of the defendant).   Easy Pass charges were paid by the plaintiff, and the state settled for $100 something, instead of $800 something.  Plaintiff gets some money, not $3k. 

Second-

Coon Cat Custody-(This is the one where the defendant states "A cat isn't a roommate, it's an infant")-Plaintiff (room renter) suing defendant for her cat back, plaintiff moved in with the cat, but defendant still has it.  Cat is in court with defendant, and a designated cat holder.   Police were involved with the dust up, and plaintiff did get some property back. No rent owed.  Security deposit $150, according to defendant loon, and plaintiff says she paid $650 total.    Ms. Jarman, defendant was emergency contact on vet paperwork, not as co-owner.   I really hope Byrd takes the Flyswatter of Death after the defendant, and I get to see it.  Cat was declawed when plaintiff adopted it three years ago.  Defendant got a license in her name, vet bills, and other 'proof'.     All of this happened a month or six weeks ago, so plaintiff gets her cat back.   Defendant claims plaintiff assaulted her, and I can't see why anyone wouldn't want to punch her.  Plaintiff gets her cat back, and defendant gets nothing.

Crash Sob Story-Plaintiff suing defendant for repairs to parked car that plaintiff hit.   Defendant has a bunch of garbage excuses, including the mysterious truck that ran her off the road.   (Must be the same truck in all of these cases, wandering the country, and forcing other drivers off the road).   Plaintiff receives $5,000. 

Edited August 15, 2019 by CrazyInAlabama

[AngelaHunter]

Thanks, CrazyInAlabama for recapping all this. I'll pass on all the tales of child and/or animal abuse, women viciously battling, cell phone bills, and security deposits. This leaves me precious little to watch - which is why !Dave! was such a treat -  but until this sub-human Wilkos crap stops, I'm fine with one ep to view.  Off to watch the Beamer Trap!

[AngelaHunter]

The "I put flashy new rims and a wrap on my 11-year-old Beemer but didn't bother paying the toll tickets for it," was light enough entertainment.  10-20-year-old Caddies, Infinitis, Mercedes and BMWs are all so popular with our litigants who want to be seen tooling around in prestigious cars they can't afford to fix and refuse to finish paying for when the hulks break down. Mighty odd priorities they have.  I'd love to have a BMW. Anyone here wants to be the principal on the loan? I promise I'll make all the payments.

45 minutes ago, CrazyInAlabama said:

Child Abandonment

Honestly - plaintiff? You really and truly thought it was a smart and sensible thing to co-sign for a nearly-new car for your son's girlfriend - not even his wife -  and take a loan for 17,000$ because she needed a nearly-new car? I guess a 3 or 4K car just wasn't good enough for Miss No-Credit. Of course, after the stump-dumb girlfriend splits (Naturally she's a breeder passing on her wonderful genes even though she has no money, no credit, and few brains) plaintiff thought def would keep paying for the car. What on earth would motivate her to do so? You know plaintiff is going to pay it off and I bet her boy won't help at all. Really, at her age, she should have way more sense than this. I notice sonny-boy wasn't here to support his mom. Maybe too busy with his dynamic career. Why didn't he co-sign for his girlfriend's car? Oh, right. Stupid question.

[Florinaldo]

6 hours ago, CrazyInAlabama said:

Rescue Chihuahua Chase-

The plaintiff was a bit if a nutcase and misused her status as a Home Depot specialist of... something-or-other; I wonder how her employer felt when they learned that their name got dragged into this private mess. However, I thought that her complaint of harassment deserved closer scrutiny; the defendant's young son gave off vibes of a little thug in training and I would not be surprised if he is indeed causing the mischief she described. But JJ dismissed it outright; there probably would not have been enough direct evidence of it anyway, but still.

4 hours ago, CrazyInAlabama said:

Crash Sob Story

The defendant did not take the proceedings very seriously and did not care about how she came across. Unless her totally stupid answers were truly sincere.

Edited August 15, 2019 by Florinaldo

[CrazyInAlabama]

3 pm reruns (usually 2015)-

First-

Bonfire Blowout-Plaintiff suing neighbor/defendant for bonfire during a party  that burned his fence.  Plaintiff swears bonfire kept getting bigger and bigger, and then the fire suddenly flared up, and claims someone threw gas on the bonfire.   The fence was vinyl, and one panel (probably a 6' x 6') warped very badly.   There's also a dust up over using the dock on both properties.    Defendant claims plaintiff's wife leans on, and shakes the fence.   $1200 to plaintiff (docks are across road, and there are no designated place for each person's, and plaintiff's dock has been in the same spot for 30 years).

Move-Out Money-Plaintiff, a month-to-month tenant wants moving costs, and renovation costs on a house he was renting, that defendant gave him a 30 day notice to quit.   Defendant bought/transferred property from her father, the previous owner.     Defendant is suing for repair costs.   Plaintiff case dismissed.     Defendant is trying to get money for the renovations that plaintiff claims he did.  Defendant case dismissed.    No proof of anything.

Second-

Rapper Repair?-Plaintiff bought flipped car (originally cost $1150, and resold $4950 after doing a lot of work on it, it had a salvage title) from mechanic/defendant, and then spent $4000+ trying to fix it up to register it.     (Defendant is also a rap producer).  TItle clearly states it was a salvaged vehicle, and plaintiff claims car can't be registered, and licensed in Wisconsin.      Wisconsin, and Car has to have a safety inspection in Wisconsin, to get a clear title, and register/license the car.     The inspection doesn't sound that awful, and everything he needs is available.  Case dismissed.  (Plaintiff just won't stop whining, and trying to get money, and he can forget it). 

Begging for Money-Plaintiff made a loan to save her business to defendant, and defendant paid nothing back, and claims a lot of it wasn't a loan, but a campaign contribution to her husband's campaign).    Plaintiff gets $5000, the court limit, and that doesn't make the plaintiff whole. 

[CrazyInAlabama]

5 p.m. reruns (both episodes)-

First-

Permanently Disabled Entrepreneur-Plaintiff is totally disabled, but worked in ex-fiance's cleaning business, and claims she didn't pay him for the missed wages.    I don't consider office/house cleaning to be 'light duty'.  Defendant claims she paid him in cash, because he didn't want to report his money to the IRS, and because he can only earn $1300 a month with his disability.    I think they're both shady, Case dismissed, because it's garbage.

Fiancee Father Fight-Plaintiff suing his son's ex-fiance for a phone she stopped paying on.    Defendant says she returned the phone to ex-fiance son, and says her phone was a buy one get one free.   Plaintiff says she still owes over $300.   Defendant claims she gave a working phone back to ex-fiance, and it must have broken after that.   (Why is it always a brand new model iPhone?).     Plaintiff gets his $300+ for the phone.

Bingo Charity for Children-Plaintiffs wanted to rent a hall for a charity bingo, bought items for the bingo hall (expensive security doors, and other items).    However, they never were allowed to rent the hall.   

Plaintiff wanted to lease a residential property, put down $900 on it, but never moved in.   Plaintiff gets her $900 back.   She also wants to be reimbursed for security doors she bought to go on the house (she can forget that).  Other plaintiffs were at the defendant's office the same day, to rent a charity bingo space, and they loaned the defendant $500, and they get $500 back. 

Second-

Account Missing $30k-Plaintiff authorized defendant paralegal to pay a licensing fee.   Then he found out $30k was charged against his credit card, attorney's fees, and other items.   Paralegal/defendant swears she didn't do it, it was a software error, and she's not responsible.      Plaintiff hired an attorney, and is in dispute with the credit card company, over the $700 fee becoming $30k.    Plaintiff finally got online banking, (his previous paper statements has mysteriously stopped), and was looking at his newly activated $31,628, minus the legal $700, all 61 fees were charged by the defendant's company.    The bank reversed $3165, $19,000+ from Pay Pal, he's still out almost $10k.    Plaintiff did a police report, and they're investigating, and defendant says she went to a local precinct and they didn't know anything about it.   (Other sources say business is temporarily closed until 1 October - bet it's not coming back).    I bet he filed through another precinct (Riverside PD), and she went to the wrong one.      JJ tells defendant to shut up, pending self-incrimination and police investigation.    Defendant offered to pay everything back to him, so there goes the "I didn't do it" defense, so who would pay back losses that she wasn't responsible for.  Defendant claims man threatened her, but plaintiff says it was a ploy by the police to get her in his store, where they could record her.   (I hope the plaintiff not only did press criminal charges, but the investigator contacted others who complained about her business, and were promised refunds, and didn't receive them). 

Case dismissed.     

The Party That Was Never Planned-Plaintiff suing defendant party planner for a joint party of husband, and wife plaintiffs.    $500 for party supplies, $100 fee, and defendant didn't show up for the party.    Defendant didn't return money after she didn't show for the party, and client had to confirm in writing by a certain date, or else.   Believe me, JJ is giving a refund., including another $100.   $700 to plaintiff.   

Edited August 16, 2019 by CrazyInAlabama

[Byrd is the Word]

10 minutes ago, CrazyInAlabama said:

Account Missing $30k-Plaintiff authorized defendant paralegal to pay a licensing fee.   Then he found out $30k was charged against his credit card, attorney's fees, and other items.   Paralegal/defendant swears she didn't do it, it was a software error, and she's not responsible. 

Shannon Highfield’s digital profile reads like a 5 alarm dumpster fire. Review after review alleging lack of communication, non performance and worse. Excuse after excuse about personal issues, staffing issues, blah, blah, blah. She must be a combination of incompetent, lazy, dishonest and something less than mentally balanced.  This plaintiff was uber lucky to most of his losses mitigated by PayPal and his bank. This woman shouldn’t be allowed within a mile of other people’s money. 

[Byrd is the Word]

59 minutes ago, CrazyInAlabama said:

Fiancee Father Fight-Plaintiff suing his son's ex-fiance for a phone she stopped paying on.    Defendant says she returned the phone to ex-fiance son, and says her phone was a buy one get one free.   Plaintiff says she still owes over $300.   Defendant claims she gave a working phone back to ex-fiance, and it must have broken after that.   (Why is it always a brand new model iPhone?).     Plaintiff gets his $300+ for the phone.

This is another one of those cases where a grown man sits ideally aside while his mom or dad sues a former girlfriend for the return of property. This hipster dufus is too dumb to know that he should be the one to make the parent whole and if he had any pride whatsoever wouldn't be crowing in hallterview about how he “dodged a bullet”. Be a man FFS. 

Edited August 15, 2019 by Byrd is the Word

[AngelaHunter]

5 minutes ago, Byrd is the Word said:

This is another one of those cases where a grown man sits ideally aside while his mom or dad sues a former girlfriend for the return of property.

They have to do that because, even if they got married and had kids they can't afford anything and have no credit, so it's usually Mommy/Daddy who paid their expenses, or for cars and phones for their girlfriends, so the adult boyz sit there like lumps, transfixed by the Lights! the Lights! while Mommy does the arguing.

7 minutes ago, Byrd is the Word said:

Be a man FFS. 

On this show? Lower your expectations, please.

[DoctorK]

2 hours ago, Byrd is the Word said:

he had any pride whatsoever wouldn't be crowing in hallterview about how he “dodged a bullet

I don't doubt that he is a hipster dweeb, but I interpreted this comment as referring to his breaking up with the girlfriend who seems to be a real jerk.

[Byrd is the Word]

9 hours ago, DoctorK said:

I don't doubt that he is a hipster dweeb, but I interpreted this comment as referring to his breaking up with the girlfriend who seems to be a real jerk.

I interpreted the comment the same way. It’s pretty clear from the damage that the girlfriend intentionally destroyed that phone prior to handing it over so she’s clearly prone to fits of rage. But she clearly dodged a bullet too unless her relationship goal is to be saddled with a spineless tool too dumb to know that he should be ashamed of himself for letting his daddy buy her a new phone and then sue her to get that phone back. 

[funky-rat]

I remember the PayPal lady, and I remember at that time thinking that she may have been the victim of some fraud herself and there being some evidence that pointed me that way, but she was otherwise so incompetent that I just shook my head.

[CrazyInAlabama]

3 p.m. reruns (usually about 2015-2016)-

First-

Cat Wars- Plaintiff and sister live together, feed many feral cats.   Defendants say they have trapped and turned in over 20 cats to the Humane Society, and say that some seasons there are numerous cats.    The two litigants toss cat stuff over their 6 foot fence back and forth.    Plaintiff is alleged to have thrown water over the fence twice, and thrown a full trash bag of trash over the fence.     Then defendant sprayed a water hose up in the air, and nailed plaintiff.  (Don't the police have more to do, than arbitrate feuds over cat droppings? All the plaintiff has to do is stop feeding the feral cats).    

When defendant was opening his driveway gate, sister who doesn't live in house confronted him, and she claims he knocked her down.    Plaintiff cat nut says she doesn't feed the cats, but they eat out of her garbage (baloney! in my opinion).   Sister who doesn't live there, says the problem isn't the cat feeding sister, but the neighbors' problem. 

Defendant says he didn't touch plaintiff sister, but claims she tripped over the curb, and then faked her 'fall' and assault.  Personally, I believe the defendant.    Defendants say that they had to put up a gate, because plaintiff resident sister was coming through their fence gate and letting the cats out of the traps.   

Oh!  I'm mad now, plaintiff another sister sitting down (she lives in the house too) just gave JJ the death stare!    Just my personal opinion, I think all of the plaintiffs are a few sandwiches short of a picnic, and the mouthy one that's talking (the faller) is a scammer.     

JJ said that the plaintiffs need to stop feeding feral cats.    I think the nasty sitting down sister feeds the cats.    JJ tells the defendants to take photos, call animal control, trap the cats, and no one gets any money.   Especially, the sister who instigated it, and as she leaves the courtroom says next time "I'll throw cat feces in defendant's face".  

Second-

Pitiful Porch-Plaintiff homeowner wants a refund on a porch that she says is substandard.  Defendant is a licensed plumber, but not a licensed contractor in VA.   They actually have a written contract.    The porch was supposed to cost $7000 total, and only $5,000 was paid. 

This house sounds like it was out in the countryside, so codes may not even exist.   $5,000 for plaintiff.    Plaintiff sounds like a fool.    

Workman's Comp Chaos-Plaintiff suing former friend for helping defendant's mother close a workman's comp case.  Plaintiff is disabled, used to be a mechanic, and seems compromised by his recent strokes.   Plaintiff claims he was promised $2k by the defendant's mother (plaintiff and daughter also lived with defendant and mother).  This case was seven years old!    The woman had her case settled, and is now receiving disability.   No proof of the promise of payment by the defendant's mother.   (Defendant son says his mother had dementia, and he knew nothing about this entire case).Case dismissed. 

Shady Car Deal-Plaintiff bought used car parked on the side of the road, not from a dealer, but close to a dealer lot.   Plaintiff bought the car, title was not in his name, but someone else's, car was stolen (there are lots that sell cars on consignment from private owners, so the title would have a different name from dealer).   Everything was properly signed when she went to pay for it, and pick up car.   Plaintiff paid more than Blue Book for the used BMW too, (she paid $1000 more than KBB $7,000).   She claims when she went to register the car at DMV it was confiscated.   Plaintiff has no accounting from the bank where she withdrew the money, JJ dismisses with prejudice.  

Edited August 22, 2019 by CrazyInAlabama

[CrazyInAlabama]

5 p.m. reruns, probably 2018-2019 season-

First-

Malicious Forest Fire Eviction-Plaintiff (annoying tenant) and her equally annoying boyfriend are suing defendant landlords for unlawful eviction.   Apparently it must be a pre-Halloween filming since female plaintiff is wearing a billowing Pumpkin colored shirt.    They were renting in Riverside, CA, for a year.  The property is now rented, but to new tenants.     Prior to the end of the year lease, the plaintiffs were served with a notice that defendants didn't intend to extend their lease (a 60 day notice issued two months before lease was to expire).   They were evicted in December, and moved in February.         Plaintiffs were planning on moving in mid December (time of lease expiration), and alternate houses were no longer liveable because of forest fires.    Defendants considered the plaintiffs annoying tenants.   Plaintiffs want $3600 security back, The lease specifies that tenants will pay the eviction fees, and allege other damages.  Plaintiff wants money for negative mold test, and called the housing department several times. 

 $2300 to plaintiffs.    

I Didn't Become a Judge to Retrieve Your Toothbrush-Plaintiff suing former roommate for illegal lockout, property, and other garbage.  Then had a scuffle about something at work, and started arguing,  After telling plaintiff to leave, defendant says plaintiff broke in the back door, and the back window, plaintiff confirms she did this.  (Plaintiff says "Tooken" a lot, I really dislike her).     Defendant tried to get a protective order against plaintiff.    Defendant says on the day of the fight plaintiff took a bunch of stuff, leaving bed and clothes, she came a got other things by breaking into the back door.   $998 to defendant for door, and window, and nothing for the plaintiff. 

Second-

Family Business Bust-Plaintiff is suing his mother and sister for fraud.  Plaintiff tried to run a construction business in Washington state, but lived in Texas.   He was fined for not having a contractor's license (Mom supplied that tidbit).   Mother was going to be commission pay for jobs she obtained for plaintiff.   Sister is in court (of course it's an iPhone 8), over a iPhone and tablet she gave away that plaintiff bought.  $850 for phone for plaintiff.   Defendant / mother had plaintiff's iPad, but she claims plaintiff gave the tablet to his little brother (plaintiff says that's a lie).      Plaintiff had a roofing job in Washington, but didn't finish, and left town.  Mother claims there are four citations for not having a contractor's license.   Plaintiff is such a liar, and seems to thing having a business license is the same as a contractor's license, and it isn't the same.    Mother in Hall-terview is 'crying', but no tears.   Cases dismissed. 

Property Thrown Down Snow Bank-A wild home sale leaves a plaintiff / selling property owner suing new property owners.   Plaintiff sold house to defendants, and claims they disposed of her property (after closing time).    This all happened in January in Minnesota, so plaintiff waited until the last second to start moving (she should have moved to storage).  Defendants agreed to keep her property until 1 February, but didn't show up until the 2nd of February, so her stuff was gone.   But it was very cold, and on 1 February the defendant's items were exploding from the cold, and so he put his items in the house, and garage, and put her items outside.   However, plaintiff wants $5k for her stuff, and it obviously isn't worth that.    The next day, 2 February, he put her items next to the road with a free sign.   

Defendants are suing for damaged carpets, and ruined property.   The carpet was mudstained, and replaced, so no money for that.   The defendants had the U-Haul for extra because of plaintiff's delays.  Plaintiff gets $1500, minus $40 for the U-Haul rental.  

[AngelaHunter]

So, my deck which really needs replacing has not been done yet. I'm thinking of calling a plumber to get him to do it. Maybe also ask a landscaper to replace my roof and the disabled guy who lives in my spare bedroom to write up my will. Think of all the money I'll save!

On 8/16/2019 at 4:59 PM, CrazyInAlabama said:

Plaintiff is disabled, used to be a mechanic, and seems compromised by his recent strokes.

  That parasitic, Uncle-Fester-y grifter is about as disabled as I am. "I'm not an idiot!" he protests, and I must agree. He's been able to live for the last 15 or so years without earning one red cent, so kudos to him. I could never figure out how to do that. 

Edited August 17, 2019 by AngelaHunter

[AngelaHunter]

When I saw the repeat with Christopher Syrrakos, Wisconsin goofball, and aspiring rapper - he of the 50 repetitions of "your honour" - I just had to look him up.

He (going by the name "Big Chris") sued some other rapper who he said stole his "beats." Unfortunately, that was unsuccessful, so now he has a "hemp" store, called "StarBuds".  Unfortunately, "Starbucks" took issue with Goofy, I mean Big Chris, kind of stealing their name so he changed it to "Starbud".

https://shepherdexpress.com/hemp/cannabis/starbuds-medicals-hemp-flower-and-more/

The two dizzy old bats griping about a tree: I would like to know in what field of medicine Dr. Phyllis Popper practices since she seems to be completely batshit crazy. Maybe the "Dr." is an honorary title, though. The tree caused her constant fear, stress, nightmares, and nervousness because she was afraid the roots would infiltrate the gas lines and make her go ka-boom. Her nervousness was passed on to her dog, so she's countersuing for emotional distress for herself and her dog, I assumed. I'm sure she's driven the poor dog crazy too. Dr. Popper? One word: SLEEVES. 

Plaintiff was nutty as well, planting that tree in a stupid spot when her house is attached to that of Dr. Popper. Her garage is too hot! It's so hot there that the leaves of her LEMON tree burned, so she felt that spindly tree would cool everything down. Her son-in-law, the arborist, told her not to plant it there, but she needed that shade so damned bad she ignored him. Ladies - find something real to worry and fight about, you idiots. 

[CrazyInAlabama]

In the tree case with the two women in Phoenix, the Doctor is a medical doctor, I think family or general practice, or internal medicine.     I've actually run across her name when I was toying with the idea of moving to Phoenix.        The neighbor who planted the inadequately sized tree to shield her car, might have been parking in the driveway, but either way, in Phoenix the car is going to be super hot most of the year, and that narrow tree wasn't going to do much, and apparently her son-in-law told her that.   I loved the part where the gas line had been moved, and Dr. Popp was still claiming it was stressing her out that the tree existed, and was going to blow up the house.   

I hate to break this to the plaintiff, but that stupid tree will do nothing to help keep her car cool.   (I lived a couple of hours from Phoenix for years, nothing stops the sun).  She needs to move somewhere with a huge, solid car port, to keep the car shaded (I love the kind with solid sides for this), so the car is in shade, and air can circulate.   That might drop the car temperature to 120 degrees, instead of 130.    

The plaintiff should have thought about the publicity from this case, and the effect on resale of having her neighbor feuding with her.   

I really wonder how this all worked out after this for the two litigants.   I hope they walked away, and have stopped this petty bickering, but I doubt it.  

Edited August 19, 2019 by CrazyInAlabama

[AngelaHunter]

7 minutes ago, CrazyInAlabama said:

the Doctor is a medical doctor, I think family or general practice, or internal medicine.

Oh, my. I think if I saw my doctor on JJ, looking like a geriatric Audrey Hepburn in "Breakfast at Tiffany's", sounding like a madwoman, psycho-calling the gas company and wanting money because her dog is nervous I might try and change physicians.  Of course, it's quite possible she's able to put aside her all-consuming terror of The Tree and concentrate when she's actually seeing patients. I hope so, anyway.

8 minutes ago, CrazyInAlabama said:

The plaintiff should have thought about the publicity from this case, and the effect on resale of having her neighbor feuding with her.   

If I bought the plaintiff's house the first thing I would do is get rid of that tree. It looks ridiculous anyway, crammed in that very narrow strip of grass that separates the houses, and it does nothing to alleviate the heat problem.  Put an a/c unit in the garage and leave the car in there, unless she's like most of the people around here, who leave 60k worth of vehicles in the driveway to get shat on by birds, dented with hail and completely encased in ice so they can cram their garages to the rafters with worthless junk.

[CrazyInAlabama]

Had thunderstorms, so I only get to see half of the 5 p.m.-

Woman Terrified by Ex-Friend-Plaintiff claims former friend who is 'allegedly' being seen in strange places with her married boss (who is her witness in court).   Defendant filed for a protective order against plaintiff (I think defendant's ex single boyfriend roomed with plaintiff, don't remember if he's still defendant's boyfriend.  I wonder if they get a group discount for things?), but didn't show in court.   Defendant has no proof of any calls or texts by plaintiff, but she called him and it was blocked on his phone.   There is no proof that plaintiff threatened her, or anything else.     I really wonder if the defendant's witness' current wife saw this, and what she thinks, and if she's still his current wife?

Defendant says she broke her ankle, could come to work (witness/boss testifies to this), but couldn't go to court for the hearing.    

This will be continued tomorrow, for half of the episode, according to my cable guide (which often lies).  

I remember the Scissor Hand case, and I can't understand why that woman is running loose on the street.     She scared me, and she's only on TV.    

Edited August 20, 2019 by CrazyInAlabama

[Steph J]

Scissor Hand Assault?

Can someone please explain the defendant's math on this to me?  She needed money, so the plaintiff was going to loan her some money, so the defendant suggested that she give him $600 so that he wouldn't have to give her any money????

[AngelaHunter]

1 hour ago, Steph J said:

She needed money, so the plaintiff was going to loan her some money, so the defendant suggested that she give him $600 so that he wouldn't have to give her any money????

Yes, that's what she said and she was exasperated that JJ couldn't understand something so simple. It made as much sense as anything else she said - which is zero. Yes, the plaintiff was obviously trying to buy himself a little schtupping, and she knew that very well. She doesn't take money from men! She was raised by a strong man and would never do that, she protests as she stands there all innocent and demure in her little girly wig with the bangs and the round glasses.  This, after she just explained 10 minutes earlier how the plaintiff would give her money all the time - 100$ to "have lunch" and of course she said, "Okay!" Who wouldn't? I guess that's how she could afford to take a trip out of the country, if that was even true. 

Ms.Ellerbe has to be a sociopath. There's no way someone so young would even have time to develop into such an amoral, lying, manipulative, vicious, grasping, evil, vile snake, so it must be natural. Maybe she's on drugs? It was impossible to get one truthful or sensible word out of her, and Byrd had to finally make that bitch STFU. Too bad he couldn't give her the thrashing she so badly needs. But, hey - the scissors were dull, so what's the problem with attacking someone with them? Wow.

[Steph J]

8 minutes ago, AngelaHunter said:

Yes, that's what she said and she was exasperated that JJ couldn't understand something so simple. It made as much sense as anything else she said - which is zero.

Thanks, I was worried that I had missed something and then I started thinking that maybe it was some variation on the short change scam, but it still didn't make any damn sense to me based on the information provided.

I kind of can't believe that Judy didn't toss her out.  She's thrown people out for being far less annoying.

[AngelaHunter]

9 minutes ago, Steph J said:

but it still didn't make any damn sense to me based on the information provided.

It makes as much sense as another grifting slag on this show, getting money from some stupid dirty old man, and who said, "I wrote "Loan" on the check because it wasn't a loan." 

Litigants say lots of things that make no sense because most of them are too dumb to make up any sensible lies.

12 minutes ago, Steph J said:

I kind of can't believe that Judy didn't toss her out.  She's thrown people out for being far less annoying.

I guess she had to be sure about the stabbing incident since plaintiff was awarded extra for that. "Nobody dies from a little cut on their arm", says the lovely Ms.Ellerbe, as though that is the whole point and not that she takes scissors with her and uses them to get her point of view across, like a lunatic. That statement came near the end and determined the punitive damages, I assume.

[mochamajesty]

1 hour ago, Steph J said:

Scissor Hand Assault?

Can someone please explain the defendant's math on this to me?  She needed money, so the plaintiff was going to loan her some money, so the defendant suggested that she give him $600 so that he wouldn't have to give her any money????

She was going to give him 600 so that he could put the 350 with it and get a money order to pay her rent. Instead of giving her the 350 so she can get her own dang money order. 

[DoctorK]

20 minutes ago, AngelaHunter said:

"Nobody dies from a little cut on their arm", says the lovely Ms.Ellerbe, as though that is the whole point and not that she takes scissors with her and uses them to get her point of view across,

Yeah, I looked at the picture, the wound that Ms. Ellerbe said that it was just a little scratch. No, it was a significant but honestly not too bad, I have done much worse to myself being careless with power tools. But at least it wasn't done by a crazy woman and I dealt with it. The seriousness of the injury was not relevant, it just showed that he was attacked with a potentially deadly weapon; just because she wasn't good at it doesn't reduce the seriousness of the attack.

[AngelaHunter]

10 minutes ago, DoctorK said:

The seriousness of the injury was not relevant, it just showed that he was attacked with a potentially deadly weapon;

Exactly. Her violent nature in deliberately bringing a weapon and planning to cut him - which no normal person would do -  was the point, but she just could not get that and she never, ever will.

Was this a repeat? I never saw it.

[DoctorK]

21 minutes ago, AngelaHunter said:

Was this a repeat? I never saw it.

I think it was, I am pretty sure that I remember the psychopathic defendant.