Jump to content

Type keyword(s) to search

Josh & Anna Smuggar: A Series of Unfortunate Events


  • Start Topic

Recommended Posts

55 minutes ago, BitterApple said:

I'm beyond mind-boggled. Even if this FBI raid is rumor, who the hell sends their 11 year-old daughter to live in the home of a known child molester? Jesus Christ, what is wrong with these people? 

Could be why Jim Bob and Michelle aren't sending any of their' s over to help Anna!

Once stung, twice shy!

  • Useful 1
  • Love 8
Link to comment
6 minutes ago, Jeanne222 said:

Could be why Jim Bob and Michelle aren't sending any of their' s over to help Anna!

Once stung, twice shy!

But they're okay sending someone else's kid?

I think it's more that they need the younger girls to help run their own household. Jana can't do everything and the boys do nothing.

Edited by Future Cat Lady
missing a letter
  • Love 16
Link to comment
3 hours ago, PikaScrewChu said:

Anna has scrubbed all mentions of Cousin Emily from her IG. 

This just gets stranger and stranger.

Who is Cousin Emily? I don't use IG.

I should have waited and read the entire thread before posting. I'm beyond shocked that anyone would let their young daughter live with Josh, let alone as a "helper" aka house servant. 

I thought homeschooling had to be done, or at least supervised, by the child's parents or legal guardians in Arkansas. If so, that may be what initially tripped them up. And, if raising Anna's children and cleaning her house took precedent over her schooling, that would probably come under child exploitation/trafficking. Plus, if she's there with her parents' permission, they're going to get nailed, too.

If this is what is happening, I bet the Duggars and the Gothard cult scream religious persecution and family harassment.  

Edited by Nysha
Just needed to read to answer my question.
  • Useful 1
  • Love 10
Link to comment
2 minutes ago, Nysha said:

Who is Cousin Emily? I don't use IG.

Cousin Emily is the granddaughter of one of Michelle's sisters. She's been with the Smuggars as a "helper". If you go far back in this thread you'd probably see a lot of pictures of Emily and Mack together. 

Dear god. Imagine if this was a rumor like Benessa in the church at their wedding...

  • Useful 1
  • Love 3
Link to comment
9 hours ago, farmgal4 said:

Apparently Anna has turned off comments on her SM accounts, which seems suspicious IMO.  I hope it’s not true, for the sake of Anna and the children.  I can’t imagine being hugely pregnant + 5 other children and having to deal with something like this.  It would be tragic.

Shades of when Meredith was born and the previous scandal broke at the same time. What terrible timing if Anna is due to give birth soon. 

  • Love 6
Link to comment
40 minutes ago, Nysha said:

Who is Cousin Emily? I don't use IG.

I should have waited and read the entire thread before posting. I'm beyond shocked that anyone would let their young daughter live with Josh, let alone as a "helper" aka house servant. 

I thought homeschooling had to be done, or at least supervised, by the child's parents or legal guardians in Arkansas. If so, that may be what initially tripped them up. And, if raising Anna's children and cleaning her house took precedent over her schooling, that would probably come under child exploitation/trafficking. Plus, if she's there with her parents' permission, they're going to get nailed, too.

If this is what is happening, I bet the Duggars and the Gothard cult scream religious persecution and family harassment.  

In current law, an Arkansas homeschool has to be "provided by" a parent or a legal guardian....I've been looking at that since the law was amended in 2017 but I haven't asked a lawyer.....However, I have a feeling that word just means that you set up some place where your kid will get something that you're calling a home-provided school.....

Their law is still called one of the loosest in the country, including by strong homeschooling advocates, and I haven't noticed any discussions or articles online about any issues or challenges that would have resulted in those words being defined in court. 

Out of my ignorance, though, I do get the feeling that you can "provide" pretty much anything and it's okay as long as you attest to "providing" it......I think the law's intended to very strongly protect parents' rights to see their children raised in any way they want.....

I assume Cousin Emily's family lives in Arkansas also? If they lived in another state, there might be issues you could raise based on whatever that state's laws were .... But I assume that's not the case? 

Edited by Churchhoney
  • Love 4
Link to comment
1 minute ago, Sew Sumi said:

Ingratiating themselves with their more famous kin?

You have to wonder, don't you.....

Jill R'll probably ship a few of hers down there next .... As long as Anna doesn't insist on a better class of servants, of course....

Link to comment

Emily's popped up on Counting On...not prominently, but in the background in storylines involving the whole family. I remember first seeing Emily in one of Jill's pics/videos, perhaps several months to a year or so ago?

  • Useful 3
  • Love 3
Link to comment

OMG...I'm a casual reader of this thread because I hate Josh and don't care how his life is going so I didn't know about Emily. That is SICK that someone purposefully placed a little girl in that house KNOWING this guy's history. 

That being said, who knows if anything went down today. But if it did, I really hope it was more about Jim Bob's shady AF businesses and nothing to do with this poor little girl whose life is already ruined enough because she's been nothing but a slave in the home of two lazy blobs.

Link to comment
3 minutes ago, Scarlett45 said:

The Mann Act anyone?

I think that only applies to minors being transported for sexual purposes, which I am so hoping is not the case here.

But I am not a lawyer let alone one familiar with Arkansas laws. I would devoutly hope that bringing in a child to be an unpaid au pair would be against some law and once it crosses state lines doesn’t it becomes federal?

  • Useful 1
  • Love 7
Link to comment

Poor Emily. Nobody sends their 11-12 year old to live with a different family for an entire year unless there are troubles at home that can't be resolved or fixed. These people aren't living under a rock. They know who and what Josh is, they know that the Duggars will do everything in their power to hide sins and imperfections at any cost, and they still sent their daughter to live in his home. 

My husband's cousin was overly friendly with the young girls in the family and even though everyone swore his affection was innocent, we stopped attending family gatherings that included him when we adopted our daughters. We weren't willing to take a chance or let our girls think he was a safe person.

3 minutes ago, Oldernowiser said:

I think that only applies to minors being transported for sexual purposes, which I am so hoping is not the case here.

I would think sending a child to live with a known child molester would be considered child endangerment at the very least.

  • Love 19
Link to comment
5 minutes ago, Oldernowiser said:

I think that only applies to minors being transported for sexual purposes, which I am so hoping is not the case here.

But I am not a lawyer let alone one familiar with Arkansas laws. I would devoutly hope that bringing in a child to be an unpaid au pair would be against some law and once it crosses state lines doesn’t it becomes federal?

My knowledge is more historical than legal, but I am pretty sure the Mann Act is for any age woman being transported across state lines for immoral purposes, not just underage girls. Any lawyers in the house? 🙂 

  • Useful 2
Link to comment
9 minutes ago, Nysha said:

These people aren't living under a rock. They know who and what Josh is, they know that the Duggars will do everything in their power to hide sins and imperfections at any cost, and they still sent their daughter to live in his home. 

Yup. At the very very least they are awful scum who don’t care about their daughter at all to let her live there. At the worst they sold her. 

4 minutes ago, Zella said:

My knowledge is more historical than legal, but I am pretty sure the Mann Act is for any age woman being transported across state lines for immoral purposes, not just underage girls. Any lawyers in the house? 🙂 

I’m a lawyer- the Mann act has been amended and is gender neutral, it covers human trafficking for forced prostitution, child pornography, illegal sex work etc etc. It covers children and adult persons who haven’t consented. 

  • Useful 16
  • Love 5
Link to comment
1 minute ago, Scarlett45 said:

I’m a lawyer- the Mann act has been amended and is gender neutral, it covers human trafficking for forced prostitution, child pornography, illegal sex work etc etc. It covers children and adult persons who haven’t consented. 

Aha thank you! I'm glad to hear it has been amended. I don't recall them ever discussing the Mann Act within a modern context in any of my history classes. 

  • Love 6
Link to comment
9 minutes ago, Zella said:

Aha thank you! I'm glad to hear it has been amended. I don't recall them ever discussing the Mann Act within a modern context in any of my history classes. 

You’re welcome. 
 

Again- why would ANYONE send their small child to live in a home with a CONFESSED child molester???? He confessed. If Anna couldn’t handle all her kids stop reproducing. If this girl actually needed a home (like Tyler did) JB & Michelle’s home would’ve been a better choice- at least Josh doesn’t live there. 

  • Love 22
Link to comment
2 minutes ago, Scarlett45 said:

You’re welcome. 
 

Again- why would ANYONE send their small child to live in a home with a CONFESSED child molester???? He confessed. If Anna couldn’t handle all her kids stop reproducing. If this girl actually needed a home (like Tyler did) JB & Michelle’s home would’ve been a better choice- at least Josh doesn’t live there. 

It is truly baffling. I suspect most of the Duggar siblings themselves have been brainwashed and guilt-tripped into still dealing with Josh at family events, but I cannot fathom why anyone would let their kid live in a home with him.

Indeed, I suspect, though they may never admit it publicly, most of his siblings likely wouldn't be willing to let their child stay in his house. 

  • Love 11
Link to comment
1 minute ago, Zella said:

It is truly baffling. I suspect most of the Duggar siblings themselves have been brainwashed and guilt-tripped into still dealing with Josh at family events, but I cannot fathom why anyone would let their kid live in a home with him.

Indeed, I suspect, though they may never admit it publicly, most of his siblings likely wouldn't be willing to let their child stay in his house. 

I agree. 
 

I always thought the other kids didn’t like Josh very much (back in the early days), but just because he was an asshole. Once JB & Michelle are gone I can see a few having nothing to do with him. 

  • Love 14
Link to comment
5 minutes ago, Future Cat Lady said:

I've been thinking that Anna's helper is very young because they (Anna, Ma & Pa Duggar) don't want to put another woman in that house with Josh. That could be too much temptation for Josh. 

I could see that, but this is a man who hurt his 5yrs old sister, FIVE!!, (and his other sisters and an unrelated teenage girl)

If he was just a run of the mill cheater, that would still be wrong (to force the girl to work there) but I wouldn’t be worried for her safety. Tons of people cheat on their spouses, MOST humans would never dream of hurting a child. Josh isn’t a guy with roaming eyes he’s a confessed child molester. 

  • Love 19
Link to comment
3 minutes ago, Scarlett45 said:

I could see that, but this is a man who hurt his 5yrs old sister, FIVE!!, (and his other sisters and an unrelated teenage girl)

If he was just a run of the mill cheater, that would still be wrong (to force the girl to work there) but I wouldn’t be worried for her safety. Tons of people cheat on their spouses, MOST humans would never dream of hurting a child. Josh isn’t a guy with roaming eyes he’s a confessed child molester. 

Very true but that might not be how they see it. If she’s actually living there, they obviously don’t think that’s a problem and that Josh could harm her. 

  • Love 2
Link to comment
2 minutes ago, Future Cat Lady said:

Very true but that might not be how they see it. If she’s actually living there, they obviously don’t think that’s a problem and that Josh could harm her. 

I think it’s more likely they just don’t care (best case) or they “sold/rented” her for whatever Josh and Anna wanted. (worse case)He confessed to hurting his own sisters- it’s public knowledge. They know it’s possible. 

I don’t buy “they didn’t think Josh was a threat”, that’s like saying “I didn’t know my child could get burned playing with the stove”. 

  • Love 7
Link to comment

If nothing was going on I don't see all these SM accounts having their comments closed or posts wiped.  Something is definitely up.

After watching the documentary Prophet's Prey and how these religious cults treat their women and children...ugh.  I don't think the Duggars are quite on the level of what those Mormon FLDS are but just because they dress a little nicer, have a show, and have a media presence doesn't mean their version of Christianity is any better.  Praying the naughty thoughts away didn't help Josh one bit, if any of this is true.  And nope, don't feel sorry for Anna one bit.  That was her choice to stay and have more children.  I'd be curious to know if her more normal siblings have closed down comments on their SM, if they have them.  

  • Love 11
Link to comment

There are a lot of assumptions being made here.

1. There is no evidence (concrete) of any wrongdoing. There is a vague accusation that something has gone wrong, but we have no concrete proof something has happened.

2. If wrong-doing occurred, we have no way of knowing what kind of wrong-doing occurred.

3. We have no proof that anyone has been living with Josh and Anna other than their own children. I got the sense that some relatives visit both Josh and JB and Michelle. They may be staying at TTH. 

4. We have no reasons to assume that any particular person is a victim in this case. (We know a lot about his earlier crimes, but not what's going on.) 

I have no particular sympathy for Josh, but I do have (a lot) sympathy for the possible victim who may not be a victim at all. They deserve to not have blind speculation drawn to them. 

  • Useful 1
  • Love 18
Link to comment

As for folks knowing about Josh's background but still not thinking he is a threat, that reminds me very much of some of the victim families in the R. Kelly case--they knew accusations hung over R. Kelly, but they just were sort of vague on the details and assumed, for various reasons, that it would not happen to their daughter. Even the ones who tried to take precautions quickly realized that nothing they did was going to stop him. But by then, it was too late. 

One of the things that has long bugged me with the Duggar case is so many people (outside this forum) don't really know the accusations against Josh. They just assume that the accusations are exaggerated or insignificant or unsubstantiated. I remember when that scandal first broke, I ended up having to explain the details to multiple people who thought it was no big deal. Then when they heard the full extent of the details, they were horrified and realized it really was a big deal. 

Edited by Zella
  • Love 14
Link to comment

One picture of this minor cousin has been posted. The Duggars, including Anna, have posted pictures all summer long - not one post included this young girl. Not one with any of the new grandbabies, on vacation, or at any birthday party. I don't think she lives anywhere, but at home with her parents (thank God).

It appears an FBI raid didn't happen either. It would be front page news in the Arkansas area and all over the tabloids. 

I'm guessing the reliable sources got their info crossed or made all this up.

  • Love 8
Link to comment

PLEASE READ THAT WITH A SARCASTIC VOICE. 

WHY ARE YOU WORRIED ABOUT A LITTLE THING LIKE CHILD MOLESTATION AFTER ALL FUCKFACE ONCE SAID EVERY FAMILY HAS A CHILD MOLESTER IN FAMILY. 

(yes I know that I was yelling)

Edited by Rabbittron
Link to comment
9 hours ago, Zella said:

My knowledge is more historical than legal, but I am pretty sure the Mann Act is for any age woman being transported across state lines for immoral purposes, not just underage girls. Any lawyers in the house? 🙂 

IANAL but it does apply for both women and girls, etc. Just people in general now. 

Sorry -- day late, dollar short. 

Edited by Churchhoney
  • Love 2
Link to comment
10 hours ago, awaken said:

Shades of when Meredith was born and the previous scandal broke at the same time. What terrible timing if Anna is due to give birth soon. 

I remember when I honestly believed Meredith would be their last born because of the scandals that broke when she was in utero (not to mention Josh’s obvious distaste for the idea of having more). 

I miss my ignorance. It was nice.

  • Love 12
Link to comment
14 hours ago, FairyDusted said:

The comments are finding any post to slip in the question. I can’t believe I’m watching this shit! And i’m using 2 screens to post and read. 

Gotta be a deprogramming weekend for that. 

Please DONATE

I have a large bottle of strawberry margarita I will be willing to part with !

  • LOL 2
Link to comment
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...