Jump to content
Forums forums
PRIMETIMER
Stinger97

GH In The News: The PC Press Club

Recommended Posts

18 hours ago, UYI said:

Sorry to go off-topic (sort of), but: really? Is it one of Alan Locher's reunions? 

 

4 hours ago, peachmangosteen said:

Aw, her birthday is the day before mine! Also, do you have a link to the AMC reunion? 

This isn't one of Alan Locher's reunions. EW is hosting it. Here's the info -

https://ew.com/tv/ew-reunites-all-my-children-cast/

To make it more #GH related, Tamara Braun and Billy Miller will also be participating.

ETA: Oh, and Colonel Sanders.

 

Edited by tvgoddess
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post

6 hours ago, Ambrosefolly said:

Which is a shame. Does she not enter like Jane Elliot?

 

I think what happen back in the those days, the shows choose who they would submit for each category and they had limited spot (two per category). And their was always other actresses ahead of her after she age out of the younger actress category. 

Edited by gator12
  • Useful 1

Share this post


Link to post

I remember Patrika Darbo (formerly Nancy on DOOL and Shirley on B&B; ultimately a Primetime Emmy winner) talking up Becky in an interview about the Daytime Emmys. This was a year in the early aughts that the nominations had come out and Becky had not received one. Darbo said Becky and another then-young actress (I can't recall) were two she had been encouraging people to look at.   

It is a little odd that she's only had three nominations in 20+ years. She doesn't always have material that's unquestionably "about" Liz, but she's frequently outstanding in other people's stories, and it would be hard to define "supporting" better.  

8 hours ago, UYI said:

I do think an honorary Juvenile Award would be a fair compromise, and I think the Oscars should probably have kept it too: look how awkward it is the few times kids are up against seasoned adults!

I don't know; I think movies are a little different. You're more likely to get a well-written role that's really at the center of a movie, with the guidance of a top director, as was the case when Anna Paquin won at 11 under Jane Campion's direction. I actually thought it was kind of cool in 2013 when the youngest Best Actress nominee ever (Quvenzhané Wallis, 9) competed with the oldest Best Actress nominee ever (Emmanuelle Riva, 85), and either of them would have been a defensible winner. But it went to Jennifer Lawrence, 21...who was playing older than her own age, and would have been in the "Younger" category had she been on a soap.

Edited by Asp Burger
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post

^^^^She was actually 22 when she won (she turned 23 later that year in August), but I see your point. :)

I seem to remember a story about how MB tried to play it safe one year by either staying or bumping himself back into the Supporting category, only for it to backfire when Ian Buchanan (then on B&B) beat him for the award. (Duke beat Sonny! Hee!)

ETA: I did notice that Becky's third nomination was in 2012 (Jake's "death"). Even if she doesn't submit herself for consideration, you would think someone at the show would have put her up for Lead Actress in that case, rather than in the Supporting category (then again, that story did become more about Luke and his angst, so maybe that DOES track, bleh). 

Edited by UYI
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
11 hours ago, Asp Burger said:

It is a little odd that she's only had three nominations in 20+ years. She doesn't always have material that's unquestionably "about" Liz, but she's frequently outstanding in other people's stories, and it would be hard to define "supporting" better.  

Definitely, but her supporting stuff is hardly ever flashy, and that seems to be what gets rewarded. You have to have be all emotional—or else go entirely against type—to win. It's one of my big beefs with most acting awards.

16 hours ago, gator12 said:

I think what happen back in the those days, the shows choose who they would submit for each category and they had limited spot (two per category).

I think this was one reason the system got revamped with pre-nominations and all of that. The shows kept pushing the same actors every year, and it was hard for others to break in, even if they'd had an especially good year.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
20 hours ago, UYI said:

That's fair. I'll admit my idea wasn't perfect, lol. But I do think an honorary Juvenile Award would be a fair compromise, and I think the Oscars should probably have kept it too: look how awkward it is the few times kids are up against seasoned adults! When Tatum O'Neal won her Supporting Actress Oscar for Paper Moon in 1973, the only other nominee in her age range in her category was Linda Blair in The Exorcist; every other nominee was an adult! 

The Best Younger Actor/Actress should be the compromise. Anymore awards and it starts diluting the awards even further. The Oscars had the Best Lead, Best Supporting, and then Juvenile. As bad as politics surrounding the primetime Emmys and Oscars are, at least because of the finite nature of movies and primetime shows, actors aren't absolutely guaranteed nominations, because sooner or later they have to move on to other roles and more or less prove themselves all over again. While the soap industry is pretty incestuous, actors can stay in roles for decades if the role is popular enough. Yes, the Meryl Streeps and Tom Hanks are pretty reliable for getting nominations,  younger actors in their twenties, teens or still in childhood are often represented if the performance are strong enough. There was even a string where 20 somethings actresses Jennifer Lawerence, Emma Stone, and Brie Larson won the Best Actress Oscar in a span of a few years. Sarah Brown has been brought up a lot, but I remember, maybe when she was on the show as original Carly, that people commented that she was submitting for Younger Actress when she was clearly a lead actress by that time. But you have to deal with all of the stalwart legends like Susan Lucci or Tony Geary get there almost obligated nomination, often forcing late 20, early 30 something actors to compete in the supporting actor categories, even if they were leads in stories and have been on the show for many years, which trickles down to sensations like Sarah Brown having to be placed in the Younger Actor category, thereby edging out actual children and teens who, by law, can only work so much.

Share this post


Link to post

On 5/24/2020 at 6:50 AM, Sake614 said:

same thing happened to RoHo when he was on OLTL. It’s why he stopped doing any press for years. 

My favorite memory of RoHo will always be when he won his first Daytime Emmy and told his kids he'd try and get Big Bird's autograph for them.

Edited by yowsah1
  • Like 3
  • Laugh 3

Share this post


Link to post

Just watched Michael E. Knight on Steve Burtons podcast. I had forgotten what MEK sounded like. For the love of god he needs to loose that stupid accent on GH. It does nothing for him. Maybe, they can do a reveal where we find out that’s it’s fake and he can use his real voice. Also, he even looks better on the podcast then he does on GH. On GH he looks embalmed and too pale. Anywho, that’s my two cents.  

Share this post


Link to post

I am for it.  I wasn't, but the idea has grown on me since I can't imagine them pulling a stunt like the Steve/Stefan thing that ended my DAYS viewership after the jump.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post

It's amusing that TR thinks GH cares what the viewers want.

That said, a time jump wouldn't be a bad idea, though we all know Michael would have Wiley, Sam would be freed from parole and she and Jason would be together, Sonny will have vanquished Cyrus, Olivia would still be terrible Lulu for having the nerve to move on after her divorce, etc. In other words, the outcomes for all the current stories would be the inevitable. New stories wouldn't be any different if they're not going to make fundamental changes, i.e., Sonny/Carly/Jason don't win every. single. time.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
3 hours ago, dubbel zout said:

Sam would be freed from parole and she and Jason would be together

She would be freed from parole but they will have come up with another reason why Sam and Jason can't be together. Other than the real reason, of course, which I assume is that SBu doesn't want to do lovey scenes.

Unless they change some storylines, Maxie will be married to Peter and their toddler will be playing around the apartment, Finn and Anna will also be married, the teens will be heading off to university, in Post Charles of course. Mike will be dead but we'll have endless flashbacks of Sonny suffering. Willow will be pregnant with Michael's baby. This is  like a bad dream.

Share this post


Link to post

I wonder who's life they will ruin to be together? With the rise of the "Karen" meme, it occurs to me that Sonny, Carly and Jason are a bunch of Karens and Karen Wexler was probably the least Karen.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
On 5/28/2020 at 8:22 PM, ByaNose said:

Just watched Michael E. Knight on Steve Burtons podcast. I had forgotten what MEK sounded like. For the love of god he needs to loose that stupid accent on GH. It does nothing for him. Maybe, they can do a reveal where we find out that’s it’s fake and he can use his real voice.

Accents for TV characters who are going to be ongoing are always something to think long and hard about. For a movie, it's different. You know when it's going to be shooting, you do your work in advance, it's great or passable or not so great (even someone as good with accents as Cate Blanchett had her Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull misfortune), and it's in the can. But an actor in a TV show might have to maintain it for years, no end in sight.  

I remember when Peter Reckell of DOOL had a regular role on Knots Landing, and the show unwisely made his character Irish. That brogue was sliding all over the place. Sometimes really heavy, sometimes light to nonexistent. They finally did exactly what you want GH to do with MEK -- they had another character say, "Hey, what happened to your accent?" and he revealed that it had always been fake. 

Share this post


Link to post
On 5/28/2020 at 5:22 PM, ByaNose said:

Just watched Michael E. Knight on Steve Burtons podcast. I had forgotten what MEK sounded like. For the love of god he needs to loose that stupid accent on GH. It does nothing for him. Maybe, they can do a reveal where we find out that’s it’s fake and he can use his real voice. 

Our local station had him on an afternoon program and it was disarming (in a good way) to hear MEK’s voice. The accent is so awful we’ve been fast forwarding him.

It’s not like it’s necessary for the plot lines so yeah, have it as fake or do a Dev. Hell, just have it go away without attempting to explain - not like it would be in the  top 10 leaps of faith the writers ask us to take.

 

1 hour ago, Asp Burger said:

Accents for TV characters who are going to be ongoing are always something to think long and hard about. For a movie, it's different. You know when it's going to be shooting, you do your work in advance, it's great or passable or not so great (even someone as good with accents as Cate Blanchett had her Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull misfortune), and it's in the can. But an actor in a TV show might have to maintain it for years, no end in sight.  

I remember when Peter Reckell of DOOL had a regular role on Knots Landing, and the show unwisely made his character Irish. That brogue was sliding all over the place. 


Good point on TV vs movie, and bigger (or any) budget for dialect coaches.  And the Peter Reckell mention brought the Ronan O’Reilly memories back...ugh.

Share this post


Link to post
37 minutes ago, mbluecpa said:

Our local station had him on an afternoon program and it was disarming (in a good way) to hear MEK’s voice. The accent is so awful we’ve been fast forwarding him.

It’s not like it’s necessary for the plot lines so yeah, have it as fake or do a Dev. Hell, just have it go away without attempting to explain - not like it would be in the  top 10 leaps of faith the writers ask us to take.

 


Good point on TV vs movie, and bigger (or any) budget for dialect coaches.  And the Peter Reckell mention brought the Ronan O’Reilly memories back...ugh.

I remember Reckell on Knots. He came out of the gate strong but then he didn’t have any relationships (as in related to) with any of the core characters and then didn’t last long afterwards. I didn’t think he & Sheridan looked great together but I think they wanted her with William Devane.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post

I am finally watching The Story of Soaps and Genie Francis looks absolutely stunning in it. GH makeup and wardrobe does her no favors. 
And Andy Cohen, until real life people can come back from the dead, reality tv will never replace the soaps. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
On 5/30/2020 at 1:21 PM, statsgirl said:

She would be freed from parole but they will have come up with another reason why Sam and Jason can't be together. Other than the real reason, of course, which I assume is that SBu doesn't want to do lovey scenes.

Not just SBu.  KeMo constantly acts like she can't stand to be in the same zip code as SBu, much less share a bed.

  • Like 1
  • Laugh 1

Share this post


Link to post

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Customize font-size