Jump to content

Type keyword(s) to search

NFL Thread

TheGongOfDoom

By TheGongOfDoom
in Sports

  • Reply
  • Start Topic

Recommended Posts

Carey

Carey

Had a feeling that Harbaugh would've found a way to survive.  Several teams playing against Burrow and company often crumble.  Cincinnati is one of the best teams that are great at midgame adjustments.  Shades of New England when they were very good.

Just was a bit surprised that Los Angeles would blow a big lead.  Not so much the Chargers, which they've done a ton, but that was before Jim got there.  Still they won.  Guess it helps when you have family that has tips to beating AFC North opponents

Link to comment
  • Replies 28.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • mojoween

    3099

  • Carey

    2245

  • merylinkid

    1578

  • twoods

    969

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

mojoween
mojoween

Cancelling Directv, throwing out season tickets and burning jerseys because of ANTHEM PROTESTS and yet supporting teams with domestic abusers, murderers/accidental killers and drug abusers is the DUMB

DrSpaceman73
DrSpaceman73

I believe it was a surface pro he threw, not an iPad.  Surface pros don't weigh as much.  And probably his best throw all night.  ...........             T

twoods
twoods

Why don't they close down the concession stands and bathrooms during the anthem so everyone is forced to stand up? Better yet, why doesn't every armchair asshole stand up at home during the anthem ins

Posted Images

Carey

Carey

The thing is Houston is currently borderline.  If you're Detroit (Dallas totally isn't), then taking the penalty totally makes sense regardless of the outcome.  Same with Baltimore, Buffalo, Philadelphia, etc.  On the other hand, if you're a team (that includes the teams I just mentioned) facing a team like Kansas City, Minnesota, Pittsburgh, or any team with solid defense, you have to take the points.  Especially off of a great but no longer unprecedented 64-yard field goal. 

Of course, if you can score, then I'd do what Dallas did.  Unless you weren't having any success within that game.

The Cowboys are done.  Mike McCarthy is done.  Doesn't really matter thinking about that blunder.  Maybe he thinks it through any other time, but a lost season with nothing to lose makes it moot.  I do not think Jerry Jones is rewarding the guy with an extension had they converted there.  Or even if they win the game

Link to comment
Magog

Magog

(edited)

Texans 34 - Them Boyz 10

Man, I've sure enjoyed that ass-whooping tonight!! 😊 😊

HA HA HA HA!!!! 😂 😂

I really hope that loser Jerry Jones & his loser son Stephen enjoyed it as much as me. 🤣 🤣 🤣

Edited by Magog
  • Like 2
Link to comment
merylinkid

merylinkid

McCarthy is gone after the season.   The play calling was terrible.   I think he just gave up.   Taking 3 points off the board to accept a penalty when you have been having trouble in the red zone all evening was stupid.   3 points would have closed the gap.   But after not making it, its like the momentum went out of the team.  

The doink was Aubrey's fault, he slipped.   

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Carey

Carey

For what it's worth, Dallas nearly turned the ball over before the drive ended.  Near fumble lost, and then a near pick six.  As mentioned, the Cowboy should have taken the points.  You're not a Detroit or Philadelphia where you can score at will, and Houston's defense isn't as horrible as Cincinnati's defense or the Jets & Panthers. 

If you were accept the penalty, maybe go for it over a 64 yard field goal.  Which you shouldn't do if it's 4th and a lot.  At which point, just punt there.  It's a moot point because Dallas is done anyway.

IMO, what's different between Jason & Mike is that the former was one of their own.  However, "batting" .500 each of your first 3 seasons losing out on a chance on not just a winning season but the division title is tough.  Especially when it benefited every other team in the division.

Since then 2 division titles & a playoff win.  However, running into prime A-Rod wasn't pleasant.  First loss was sort of questionable, the second one was just unlucky.  In between that was dealing with a banged up TR.  While his final three years concluded with another NFC East title & playoff win and not getting it done in 2019, the way things shaped up helped a guy who collected 3 rings with the same franchise.

The other guy is just another dude from Western Pennsylvania who has only one playoff win against a guy in his mid 40s before losing to Jimmy G and later on to 7th seeded Green Bay.

Link to comment
Carey

Carey

I'd put him in.  Like this year.  Otherwise that might be a problem with all the other QB's that are due before the decade ends.

On an unrelated note (for the most part) I think I've definitely changed my tune on Edelman's 2026 eligibility (well, starting in 2026).  Screw the stats on the lack of First Team All Pros.  Screw the stats on the lack of Pro Bowls.  When you ball out in the biggest games, in January, and can play the game in multiple ways, I'd put him in ASAP.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
baldryanr

baldryanr

10 hours ago, Carey said:

I'd put him in.  Like this year.  Otherwise that might be a problem with all the other QB's that are due before the decade ends.

It's an old argument, but I think those two rings have to get him in.  The real fun will be when Matt Ryan and Philip Rivers come up.  I think they're comparable (and maybe even a little better) than Eli, but no rings is a real downer for their cases.  Is being above average for a long time enough?  In basketball, the answer (for better or worse) is yes.  I'm not so sure about football.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
bluegirl147

bluegirl147

(edited)
5 minutes ago, baldryanr said:

It's an old argument, but I think those two rings have to get him in

And those two rings came against a team who's players from that era will be if they aren't already in the HOF.

Edited by bluegirl147
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Carey

Carey

Just now, bluegirl147 said:
5 minutes ago, baldryanr said:

It's an old argument, but I think those two rings have to get him in

And those two rings came against a team who's players from that era will be if they aren't already be in the HOF.

Agree & disagree there.  We know about Brady and Moss, as well as Seymour and Gronkowski.  We'll see with Harrison & Edelman.  Revis and Seau on the team was very short-lived, not sure about Vrabel, pretty certain about Vinatieri, but the majority of those players aren't getting in (unless people have a pleasant heart)

While stopping New England in 2007 was rather impressive defensively like Seattle and Denver did in 2013 & 2015, when you persevere against Belichick in the biggest game, that means everything.  Helped that the defense showed up, but that also helped Jared Goff in 2018.  So that's a decent case, more than the name on the back of his jersey.

Speaking of TB12, I should have mentioned that Tom is in and Drew Brees is in (unless proven otherwise).  That QB "log jam" is based on everyone else, including Matt Ryan.  Plus there's Nick Foles, who would have a better case than Eli if we judged things on Super Bowls more than anything else.

Doesn't help that there are other people eligible in the next several years (Adam V, Suggs, Fitz (not Ryan), Withworth, AB, maybe AP).  However, typically they'd like to get a QB into Canton & each QB class.  I know Warner had to wait a minute, but he also didn't play that long either.

No reason Edelman can't get in as mentioned, but I'm not going to be surprise if I'm proven otherwise.  I did disagree a long time ago, but changed my mind FWIW.  It had something to do with Josh Allen I believe.

Link to comment
merylinkid

merylinkid

19 hours ago, Carey said:

When you ball out in the biggest games, in January, and can play the game in multiple ways, I'd put him in ASAP.

Wasn't one of the reasons Lynn Swann took so long to get in was because he was great in the playoffs but not the rest of the time.

Eli can  join his dad* and Peyton in the HOF.

 

 

 

 

 

 

* yes I know Archie Manning is not, but that's my schtick here and I am sticking with it.

Link to comment
Carey

Carey

That College HOF thing for Archie is an annual tradition here LOL!

Swann probably doesn't wait that long had he played for someone other than the Steelers.  Of course, there were a ton of Hall of Famers on that team, which isn't the case for New England.  Or wasn't the case for the Steelers.

Speaking of which, as mentioned on Sunday, I was happier that the Chiefs lost than the Steelers winning.  For one, that 20-0 talk is dead.  Whew!  Plus that's good for Kansas City.  Unlike New England and Indianapolis in 2007 and 2009, KC lost a game they were trying to win in a month that ends in an R as opposed to a Y.  They've been fortunate and survived, but it finally caught up to them.  Now they can address their issues while no longer having to worry about "perfection" in the regular season.  On the other hand, they could be the 2011 Packers.  They're just not that good, after having played until end city the previous year (2 years for the champs in this case).

For Pittsburgh, the good news is that if they win out, they'll finally obtain the number one seed for the first time in the Tomlin Era, and the first time in 20 years.  I do get that feeling from 2004, except that team was much better.  Plus, this era of the NFL is brutal with all the Thursday Night Games and flexible scheduling.

With that, no way good news is the story for the Steelers tonight.  I've seen a ton of action for tonight's game; nothing for the Browns at all.  Everyone's going black and gold.  With a win from Cleveland, I think it might be the closest thing I've seen where a winless team knocks off an undefeated team, minimun of 10 games.  Of course, if the Steelers escape, they'll clinch another non-losing season while the Browns will hit yet another losing season.

Something that'll probably happen anyway regardless of tonight's outcome, but the percentage of that will not be 100% if the home team does win.  BTW, I do think people are going to be wrong since a loss by the home team, IMO, will not be by more than a point or two.  Maybe a FG margin.  Line is 3.5 BTW, similar to the Jets/Steelers from a decade ago.  Frustrating, but no surprise.

Finally, with the Chiefs losing to Buffalo, it now means that Pittsburgh will get a much better version next month than they could've had Kansas City won.  KC (and Pittsburgh based off of their current record) will be playing for the top seed.  Steelers might be still having to hold off or catch Baltimore.  Sadly, with a loss, it could be another year of PIT trying to win in Week 18 + get help just for a wild card.  Which is a problem since the Bengals could also be playing for the playoffs.

Despite 8-2, it's must win for the Steelers when you think about it.  Unlike anybody else, they're next game off of extra rest, is against a team that has this week off.  Then Cleveland again before the trifecta of horror or whatever someone calls it

Link to comment
kathyk2

kathyk2

2 hours ago, mojoween said:

Were I a voter, Julian Edelman, Nick Foles and Phillip Rivers would get into the HoF when they bought a ticket.

I strongly disagree about Julian Edelman he was Tom Brady's favorite receiver and was clutch especially when Gronk was injured. You can't just look at raw numbers when determining HOF eligibility.

Link to comment
voiceover

voiceover

(edited)
On 11/18/2024 at 5:26 PM, merylinkid said:

Even the [Cowboys’]stadium is giving up on the season.

Another one worth the repeat; wish one of the emojis here was just the acronym FAF, because @merylinkid deserves all the credit I’ll give when I use that line.

Been watching the vids from Browns/Steelers.  Man, I love snow games.  

Edited by voiceover
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Bastet

Bastet

4 hours ago, Marley said:

The snow is making this really fun to watch. I don’t know how they can even see lol.

Games like that always make me think fondly of my late grandfather.  He didn't give a shit about football, but if he was going around the dial on a Sunday and came across a game heavily obscured by snow, he found that an interesting challenge for the teams and would watch.

I wish the Steelers had won (since this time they're the team who doesn't have a rapist under center), but, yeah, the conditions were fun to watch.  (I'd never live anywhere with snow, and, if forcefully transported to such a climate, I'd never leave the house unless absolutely necessary.  That folks go attend a football game in that weather is so wild to me.)

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Notabug

Notabug

(edited)
2 hours ago, Bastet said:

Games like that always make me think fondly of my late grandfather.  He didn't give a shit about football, but if he was going around the dial on a Sunday and came across a game heavily obscured by snow, he found that an interesting challenge for the teams and would watch.

I wish the Steelers had won (since this time they're the team who doesn't have a rapist under center), but, yeah, the conditions were fun to watch.  (I'd never live anywhere with snow, and, if forcefully transported to such a climate, I'd never leave the house unless absolutely necessary.  That folks go attend a football game in that weather is so wild to me.)

Having attended more than a few Browns games at old Municipal Stadium in snowstorms back in the day; I can tell you it’s not the snow,  but the wind off the lake that gets to you. It’s all about proper layers and doing whatever it takes to keep your hands and feet warm.  If they’re cold, it’s all over.

i also attended a World Series game back in ‘97 where it snowed and that was just wrong.

Edited by Notabug
  • Like 3
  • LOL 1
Link to comment
Fukui San

Fukui San

(edited)

With the snow I’m reminded of what Ezekiel Elliott said after he played his first ever snow game last year. Something like he always wanted to try playing in a snow game because it looked fun. Now that he’d done so, he can say that it sucks.  

Edited by Fukui San
  • Like 2
Link to comment
shoregirl

shoregirl

(edited)

 

Please Jerry Jones it would be so funny 🤣  Give him play in the Thanksgiving game.

The Giants GM is for sure getting fired ..right?  Have a big contract to Danny Dimes and let Barkley walk and sign with a division rival .  I'm an Eagles fan and think he should be gone for being incompetent.

Edited by shoregirl
  • LOL 2
Link to comment
Fukui San

Fukui San

1 hour ago, bluegirl147 said:

Do they have to pay him the remainder of his contract?

According to Over the Cap, unless someone claims him (unlikely), they have to pay him the remainder.

Quote

Jones’ contract will be subject to waivers but it is doubtful that anyone will claim Jones’ contract as it still has $13.805 million in salary that has to be paid this year along with the injury guarantees for 2025. If he goes unclaimed the Giants will still owe Jones the $13.805 million as the salary is guaranteed. Jones will be allowed to double dip if he signs with another team if he winds up claiming termination pay with the Giants to recover any offset salary. Assuming he goes unclaimed, the Giants salary cap charge for Jones following the release should be $47.105 million for 2024 and $22.21 million for 2025.

 

Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...