Jump to content

Type keyword(s) to search

World War Z (2013)


Luckylyn
  • Reply
  • Start Topic

Recommended Posts

Since I finished the book, I finally watched the movie World War Z and am completely confused. I don't know why they call the movie World War Z or claim it's based on the book because the movie has very little to do with the novel. They pretty much only have zombies in common and that's it. Everything unique about the novel was stripped away to make a generic zombie movie. Why buy the rights to a novel and completely ignore it? They easily could have made the movie without buying the rights to the novel because they have so little in common. This is not a case of a movie changing a few things from the book but of a film that drops pretty much every single story line from the novel and adds new ones. I realize the interview format of the book is tricky to adapt, but it could have been done using a faux documentary format. Even if they didn't want that type of format, they could have shaped it into a global ensemble story that would have handled zombies in ways that no other movie has. The political and moral issues from the book were ignored.  There were so many interesting characters and compelling stories that were discarded so that one bland character can be the focus. How the situation is resolved in the movie and the book are completely different to the point where they have nothing to do with each other. 

 

The movie itself I found kind of boring.    It lacked a certain spark.  

 

 

  • Love 2
Link to comment

Sometimes movie rights are bought just because of the name. It might have started life as a completely independent project called World War Z, but then someone discovered the book of the same name. So they bought the movie rights. Alternately, it starts as a faithful adaptation. But someone changes one bit that doesn't quite work for the screen, someone else has to compress events for the running time, a third person has what they think is a great idea, and so on.

  • Love 1
Link to comment

This would have been so much better if it had been more faithful to the book and had been a miniseries on HBO. I can watch it if I view it as a stand alone project that just happens to have the same name as one of my favorite books.

  • Love 2
Link to comment

This would have been so much better if it had been more faithful to the book and had been a miniseries on HBO. I can watch it if I view it as a stand alone project that just happens to have the same name as one of my favorite books.

I agree with all of this. I hope someone does pick it up as a mini series one day. AMC likes zombie stuff, maybe it can be their next project. I also enjoy it as a stand alone film, so I just pretend it is an odd coincidence that there is a book with the same title.

  • Love 1
Link to comment

I do frankly think the book has its own major problems (zombies that only decay for a while and then stay preserved and capable of motion forever, Max Brooks' woeful lack of knowledge about how effective modern military weapons would actually be against mindless opponents that never take cover or fire back), but at least it didn't have instantly-transforming magic flying fish school zombies that can bring down helicopters.

Edited by Bruinsfan
Link to comment

Actually modern war weapons are meant to wound people on the belief that wounded soldiers tie up resources or cause organ damage to the lungs/tissue. Neither of which would affect zombies that require the brain to be completely destroyed. Hence why the zombies in the book can have their heads chopped yet still bite centuries later or be hit by artillery/bombs and still move. 

 

FYI there was a screenplay  that was loyal to the book hence why Mel Brooks did sign the rights away. This screenplay by J. Michael Straczynski was tossed and production delayed for several years.

 

http://moviesblog.mtv.com/2008/12/03/j-michael-straczynski-on-world-war-z-the-scale-of-what-were-doing-here-is-phenomenal/

Link to comment

I was thinking more in terms of using carpet bombing, or high rate of fire mounted machine guns that would chew vast fields of zombies into immobilized hamburger even if not all of them caught bullets to the brain. Brooks had to tie himself into knots with the contrivances that allowed the military to lose the Battle of Yonkers.

Link to comment

Even carpet bombing is designed to suck air out of lungs rather then blow people to bits. 

Mounted machine guns are meant for suppression fire namely to keep people down and not fire back. Even then the rounds just go through the flesh and don't tear someone to immobile bits. As noted you can kill only the Brooks zombies by complete destruction of the brain case. The heads can still bite and severed limbs can still move as does the body.

  • Love 1
Link to comment

I was thinking more in terms of using carpet bombing, or high rate of fire mounted machine guns that would chew vast fields of zombies into immobilized hamburger even if not all of them caught bullets to the brain. Brooks had to tie himself into knots with the contrivances that allowed the military to lose the Battle of Yonkers.

You just have to accept that zombies defy both physics and biology. The knot tying is at that end when creating the monster. Now how do we deal with this with trying to bring the real world in with everybody going into battle shooting for the center of mass with ammunition designed to wound thus taking out of combat three soldiers to care for the wounded friend  instead of one who was killed. The only thing that matters is a head shot and only Rambo gets head shots when shooting a machinegun

Link to comment

Brad Pitt turned this into a White Savior film.

Leo DiCaprio lost the bidding war to Pitt/Plan B, wonder how this would've turned out had

he won?

Really?  Considering the work that Brad Pitt has brought us in the last few years I don't think that describes him at all.  I agree that the movie has its issues but considering what they were able to salvage and go on to make 100's of millions of dollars, I think they recovered pretty nicely.  Also no one puts that much time and money into a project thinking/wanting it to be bad.  My hope is that they learned their lesson and will do better with the sequel.

  • Love 1
Link to comment

To be fair to the poster.  Whenever Leo isn't working on a movie he does have a tendency to get "fat".  Same thing with Channing Tatum.  It's actually very endearing to have proof that it isn't just the women of Hollywood. 

Link to comment

The poor Hispanic kid who lost his entire family to Zombiedom never warranted a SINGLE reaction shot.

I guess he was going to be adopted into the Brad Pitt family, though my headcase was there were going to dump him into a UN homeless shelter along the way.

Link to comment

The poor Hispanic kid who lost his entire family to Zombiedom never warranted a SINGLE reaction shot.

I guess he was going to be adopted into the Brad Pitt family, though my headcase was there were going to dump him into a UN homeless shelter along the way.

Wish they would've shown Tony'reaction to his parents being attacked and turned.

And how he got the gun and escaped.

Not surprised Gerry kept him with them, the character was shown to be a good person from the start. Plus ill shortly saved his life, shooting the zombie that attacked him in the stairwell.

Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...