As I am a civilian would someone please explain this to me.
Also, I don't understand the references to the title of the epi being disrespectful. I would appreciate someone helping me with that as well.
I feel a bit dumb to tell you the truth, but will soldier on.
This was a god awful episode. I am not feeling the new Higgins, the old one was everything you needed and an instantly identifiable stereotype that moved the story along.
The lead is, I am sure, a nice person and probably a good actor, but doesn't seem to have the sort of off kilter look at life that the original had. That said I know I watched the original from the get go, but do not remember the pilot, so perhaps there were problems there as well.
I guess I will give it another chance, but really, there was nothing that was so great that I would HAVE to come back.....if some other bright shiny thing crossed my path I'd follow that rather than watch epi 2.