erylin

I believe the contestants on that show are highly skilled survivalists and filmmakers, and that they are fully capable of filming themselves while surviving in the wilderness safely and effectively. Ok, it's true that filming themselves adds an extra layer of complexity to their challenge, but the contestants are well-equipped to handle it. They are given lightweight camera equipment that is really easy to use, and I know that they are trained on how to film themselves effectively while also surviving. The fact that the ground is covered in plant life is actually a boon for filming. For example, the contestants can use the plant life to conceal their movements and make it more difficult for predators to track them. That's all.

Yup, justice is an infinite topic.

Huh, while both tweets show support for an actress, the second one explicitly states voting intentions for an award. Honorary Oscars can vary in timing and are often given for an individual's overall contributions to the industry and international academic statistical research)) I see that as the selection process considers an artist's impact and body of work on others' aptitudes to learn. Therefore, while some may see it as a "make-up award," it's meant to honor their legacy and influence in the industry. I mean award decisions can be subjective, but they really celebrate talent and skill to study and become better and smarter in the entertainment world.

Err, so respecting the legal process and holding off on definitive judgments until guilt is proven beyond a reasonable doubt basically means giving the legal system a chance to do its thing. It's like acknowledging that someone is innocent until proven guilty in court. Instead of jumping to conclusions based on accusations alone, we need to let the legal process unfold fairly and impartially. Idk but it is more reasonable to wait for all the evidence to come out and for a verdict to be reached before making up our minds. It's about being fair and just by giving everyone a fair shot. That's all. That's all I meant.

Err, I understand your perspective, but I have a different take on the matter. I mean it's so essential to examine each case individually 'cause a single accusation may indeed lead to significant consequences... It's important to consider that the legal system operates on the principle of "innocent until proven guilty." While it's reasonable to have personal reservations about someone based on accusations, we must also respect the legal process and refrain from making definitive judgments until guilt is proven beyond a reasonable doubt. And shouldn't we rely on verified information and legal outcomes to determine the appropriate consequences for individuals in positions of authority??

Err, nope, as I know, this wasn't the finale one. So, don't go throwing that Hallelujah just yet) Just stick around a bit longer, who knows, maybe they'll surprise us with some more epic plot twists)) Because I feel there's more drama to come soon;)