I fail to see how the plaintiff is right in this situation, most of what she said are false claims and she seemed confused in the court room. Others saying the defendant has mental/psychological issues is strange to me because this girl doesn’t demonstrate any signs at any point in the courtroom. It seems to me the plaintiff has these issues. Strange claims made, the obsessive nature of the dogs and their infrastructure, causing her to have a seizure trying to ramble about this to JJ. If anything the plaintiff is lucky she has been given this deal and is lucky she gets to use the dog for her personal gain. The dog quite clearly is healthy and taken care of with his owner, who knows how he would be if held hostage by redneck scientists! The husband didn’t seem to have much to add to the case, stuck in the form of a frozen popsicle who certainly has caught a case of a severe brain freeze! I wonder if he even knew what was going on and was just nodding and agreeing with his wife.
