StudentofHistory

There are several issues with the show and information that required to further investigation or simply followed up. For investigators, I would have expected a timeline using multiple sources to support one or the other. Furthermore, why were there not legitimate analysis done to support Kennedy’s product (link analysis). what do we know? what we think we know? what do we not know? Why did they not follow up at the canary islands and not try to verify the witness claiming there were 4 enigmas on the island during and after WW2? Why not Create a list of potential suspects within the circle of hitlers’s henchmen to determine, could it have been one of them living off the spoils of war. In short order play devils advocate. Misiones, presented a problem. Why isolate your principle with no clear escape route. The house on the lake also, no clear escape route. In addition, why do a recon from the most obvious point of entry? Why not do originally what Cervantes executed and walk in from behind, through the woods. Why were drones not used for recon on that mission? As well respected Holland (Historian) is and the man knows his history. Does that make him an expert on the military decision making process? He endorsed Denmark as as a point that Hitler likely used to flee Germany. Why? Germany was losing control of Denmark at the end of the war any infrastructure would be collapsing. It would be every man for himself. For what it is worth, the show proved quite clearly how many nazis fled Europe and were supported by many countries to include the USA. I agree with many on this forum, there needed to be a title change. I suggest “The Nazi Ratline.” In addition, the final episode was a complete let down. That is it? Former FBI agrees there maybe something here? I almost spit my coffee!