Jump to content

Type keyword(s) to search

Virulent

Member
  • Posts

    11
  • Joined

Reputation

15 Good
  1. It's not about the edit being pro-Jeremy and anti-Ben. It's about reality being pro-Jeremy. Parvati had an interview with ET Canada where she said that he was extemely emotional and egotistical and childlike. Adam said on reddit that the conversation he referred to as "The most annoying in his survivor career" never made air.
  2. Tony's the best player of all-time it looks like. He ran an absolute clinic. Joe Reid hates him but you can't deny that this guy is a genius.
  3. SU has now said that he is not fully sure of the winner. I think his final 3 is Nick/Michele and one edge returnee. My guess would be that the edge returnee is Sophie. Based on the fact that she got a great edit. My guess is also that SU THOUGHT Nick won based on what he heard initially. He thought that it was a Nick win but now is not sure because of how bad Nick's edit is. If Sophie comes back and wins it sort of makes sense with the edit. During Sophie's boot the entirety of the credit was given to Tony. None at all to Nick and Michele. If she wins standing next to two people who blindsided her with an idol it makes sense to minimize her role. Parvati said that Sophie was a challenge beast and that she was incredible. Tyson clearly hates Nick and makes no attempt to hide it. I'm not seeing where these Nick votes are coming from. Making him look sneaky, gross and perverted makes sense if he loses to Sophie.
  4. The other thing about Edge is that the person who wins the reentry challenge is likely to be very good at challenges. You have to beat 13 other competitors. If Natalie comes back she probably might not even need the idol. She can just win out.
  5. Comparing Kass to Tony is ludicrous. Tony has an abrasive personality but he actually controlled the vast majority of Cagayan. Kass made one move, a terrible one that gave all the power to Tony's tribe. Tony had some abrasive interactions, notably with Kass and one after tribal where he got spooked after receiving votes. Kass literally fought with everyone on the season, her ego was hurt by Sarah so she turned on her after having fights with her. During the Morgan episode they spent the whole time bickering, she flipped the bird to Trish after sending her home. Toyed with Spencer's emotions at the final 4 vote. She also weirdly convinced herself that she heard Tony call her a b*tch which the show proved absolutely did not happen. She was a horrible person. Tony's energetic which gets mistaken for obnoxiousness, but almost everyone he's played with likes him excluding Kass. Joe Reid and others find him obnoxious but he's likable to me. I agree there's double standards in Survivor with women and people in the mom role. But Kass is the worst example, better examples of people who played good games but were hindered because of that were Monica and definitely Dawn.
  6. I'm mildly skeptical of a Tony win although it seems like the most likely outcome. The reason there's been a dearth of anti-Tony sentiment is the suggestion propagated by Anthony and others that the winner must be a man when both edit wise, social media wise the candidates on SU's winner board with much better chances are Sarah and Sophie. Just unfortunately Anthony initially went to great lengths to laugh and mock anybody who held a sentiment that the winner could be a woman. On Nick specifically his edit is terrible and at this point it would be a really disappointing conclusion to the Winners season. Especially given he doesn't even seem to have to play. He went into this season with zero reputation with a lot of room to play but placed himself in the minority by getting rid of Yul and thus all his connections to the other Dakal group. He also seems to have landed well with the swap and played himself into the minority come the merge. Him having a temper tantrum wasn't a good look and they contrasted it with Michele being calm. But I'm not worried about it for a few reasons. Nick's premerge edit is terrible. Despite being in the swing vote position in Yul's alliance, we didn't see anything suggesting he had any real input on the game. If there was a narrative tied to him it's that he's a superfan who's happy to be there. In the Tyson boot episode they could have presented it as him saving himself socially but it just seemed circumstantial. Usually when a winner receives votes and know they were the target they show them actively putting in work with them putting the boot on someone else. Post-swap they basically portray him as a fan again and almost support a narrative that he should've voted with Parvati. For the Yul boot which was probably a bad decision they give all the credit to Michele. Complete with a soaring song. Since then he's been relegated to the bottom. His best episode is probably the Adam boot where he talks about creating chaos to get the target off his back but even then it's not a great look getting zero confessionals for the family visit, and zero credit for getting into a majority position. On Tony'd be a much more worthy winner and the edit is showing it. He's actually adapted his game playing much more low-key and maintaining a position in the majority constantly despite having a target on his back. He's received a much more complex edit and his game theory about lions and hyenas makes sense. Sophie would be a fantastic winner also and is receiving a great edit. Sarah has also done well with a massive target on her back and has really created the new majority alliance. They've played the game. Nick has just sat there and waited for things to happen as presented while also having a easy path to the end because nobody cares about him. Other reasons to doubt him is his social media where he complains about being called a hyena despite it obviously being true and makes social media posts giving credit to himself for outplaying and outwitting Tyson and Parvati. Those aren't the actions of a winner. A winner never goes out of their way to mock the outwitted competition. Compare his edit and social media to Michele and I'd be shocked if he beats her at the end.
  7. Tony called the lower profile threats good players. He also tweeted that it's not that he thinks he's better than them just that he's more likely to be targeted. He's respecting them enough by sending them to the edge. I dont see Nick at all. His edit is terrible you can't earn respect by shouting and hollering like a big baby about your birthday on Survivor. That was pathetic. Grow up.
  8. Hello @Sir Vivor I am a Survivor fan, looking for spoiler info. As the edit points in the direction of Tony and Sarah I am wondering if you have any more information or if your information has been updated as it was before. Many people on other spoiler sites have looked at you as one of the best sources. Thanks in advance
×
×
  • Create New...