CrazyInAlabama
-
Posts
16.0k -
Joined
Content Type
Blogs
Gallery
Downloads
Discussion
Posts posted by CrazyInAlabama
-
-
25 April
“Moving Without a Hitch”
New, Season 10, Episode
( Julie Ribiero vs. Justin Stephanson )
From the show site: A woman was between apartments, and her friend allowed her to tow his mobile home. Then she crashed the mobile home while hitching it to her SUV and using it as a moving truck!
Plaintiff suing defendant. Defendant owned a mobile home, and was nice enough (OK, stupid enough) to let plaintiff to borrow it, and use it as a moving truck. Plaintiff wrecked the mobile home, and defendant is now homeless, and plaintiff is suing him. Judge Tewolde is angry with the plaintiff's lawsuit blaming the defendant for her property loss in an accident that was her fault.
Plaintiff was allowed by defendant and girlfriend to camp out in his trailer. Then, defendant's mother showed up, and said plaintiff couldn't put her stuff all over the defendant's property. Then, plaintiff got the keys to her new place early, and she hitched the trailer to her SUV, and it broke loose, car went straight, and trailer went it's own way. Trailer was wrecked, (on Avenue of the Giants), and plaintiff called AAA for a tow, and they declined (they don't tow RVs, trailers, etc.).
Plaintiff wrecked the defendant's trailer, which was his home, and how he's homeless. And the plaintiff has the monumental gall to sue defendant!!!
Defendant claims plaintiff didn' have his permission to use his trailer as a moving truck, and he would have warned her that she couldn't use the trailer that way, since the hitch was defective.
Defendant was stunned when he found out plaintiff stole and wrecked his trailer home, and police declined to get involved, and said it was a civil manner.
Judge Juarez is livid at the plaintiff, and Judge Tewolde is too. Plaintiff tells Judge Tewolde she wanted to surprise the defendant by moving out, it certainly was a surprise. Actually, I would call it a shock.
Corriero takes over, and even Bleeding Heart Corriero can find a way to make plaintiff's despicable actions plausible.
Defendant's travel trailer was only insured in place, not for traveling, so no claim is possible. Trailer is still at the auto shop, and isn't repairable. Defendant gives plaintiff permission to get her property out of the trailer, most generous of him.
The judges' discussion is bizarre. Plaintiff never even apologized, and judges have total contempt for plaintiff.
Plaintiff case dismissed, because it's Bull Pucky. She will be given access to retieve her junk within 10 days, and I hope it's all destroyed.
Defendant is awarded $5,000, court maximum. I wish they could give him double. (the way Judge Tewolde smacked her gavel makes me wonder if she wanted to smack something else with it).
“Mind Your Loan Business ; Handi-Snapped”
Rerun, Season 10, Episode
“Mind Your Loan Business”’
(Jacqui Ramey vs. Baker)
From the show site: Two ladies at a senior living center used to love watching Netflix together. But when a loan was made between them and nagging ensued, their relationship lost all its chill. The defendant says she'd pay it if she had it, but she's fighting a separate battle to recover lost wages. Is the plaintiff being too pushy?
Plaintiff is suing defendant for an unpaid loan. Loan was $700, and defendant repaid $200. Defendant apparently had no reason she hadn't repaid plaintiff, so the loan was paid to plaintiff by the court. Defendant makes it clear that she has no intention of repaying the remaining $500.
Judges give the plaintiff her $500.
“Handi-Snapped”
(Salomon Navarro vs Daniel Ong)
Plaintiff suing defendant for car damages from parking in defendant's parking lot. Plaintiff parked in defendant's parking lot, and he heard a strange noise, and the concrete bumper was under his car, and caused damages.
Photo shows the metal rebar securing the concrete parking space block was sticking up under plaintiff's car. However, plaintiff parked over the concrete bumper with the concrete piece going front to back under his car, not where his tires would hit the concrete stopper the way it does when you pull into a parking space correctly.
Defendant sent a check to plaintiff, for $429, but plaintiff never opened the envelope or cashed the check. Plaintiff refused to pick the check up at the post office. This is what plaintiff is suing for, and it settles the case.
Judge Juarez is slamming the plaintiff for taking this to court, and clogging up the L.A. County court system. Plaintiff is so stubborn.
$429 check from defendant to plaintiff.
-
1
-
-
According to Titan TV, here's next weeks lineup. I'm shocked that they're actually showing them in order.
Week: 29 April to 3 May
Monday-"Jewelry tussle" 10/17/2017, Season 21 / Episode 32
Tuesday-“You Broke My Window" 10/18/2017, Season 21 / Episode 33
Wednesday-"Mom sues her daughter's ex!" 10/19/2017, Season 21 / Episode 34
Thursday-"Roommate Ruckus" 10/20/2017, Season 21 / Episode 35
Friday-"Sticky Finger Stepson" 10/23/2017, Season 21 / Episode 36
-
2
-
-
I hate that Rasika will have to go to LCK, but at least Michelle stayed longer.
I didn't understand anything about the challenge, and still don't. To me Chaotic means messy, sloppy, and disjointed. However, if Rasika's was really the way the judges said, it sounds hideous. I pity the judges for having to try to eat that.
Laura is not showing very well, and I'm guessing she's going to claim a bad edit. However, you can't show something that didn't happen or wasn't said, so I'm not believing anything she says.
-
6
-
1
-
-
Michelle or Rashika is going to be hard to take. Though eitehr one could crush LCK. I don't understand the challenge at all. Rasika, LCK may be a good restart for her, and she could come back.
-
3
-
-
I was hoping for a better outcome for the Perrios. Who would have thought Roshanda would be the most dedicated one. Clarence is not going to succeed with doing the program his way. Brandie is totally out of control, and I have no hope for her.
-
4
-
-
11 minutes ago, Pepper Mostly said:
"I'm going to go back on my diet". Brandi. There is nothing to prevent you from being on your diet right now.
I do not believe any of them. They are all working with great dedication to get right back where they were.
Yes, there are always good options no matter where you travel, even if you have to get a hamburger and take the bun off.
-
2
-
1
-
-
Roshanda is right, they need to make their own way forward.
Clarence playing pool, and is playing with fire claiming he doesn't need to follow Dr. Now's program, and can do his own program. That's not the road to success. I'm afraid Clarence is going to eat through his surgery.
Brandie may be the worst, because she doesn't care about anything but her own pleasure. I don't think she'll ever get back on her diet, ever.
-
4
-
1
-
-
10 minutes ago, Pi237 said:
How do you gain that much so fast after having your stomach reduced to the size of a small banana? I know weed gives you the munchies, but wow.
Brandie just told Clarence that you can regain if you snack a lot. I'm guessing she means she eats junk food all day long. And she looks baked.
Brandie is going to eat through her surgery, and I'm so sad about that.
-
2
-
1
-
-
Unfortunately, Brandie seems to have gained it all around her waist, which is the worst place to carry weight for your health. Roshanda needs to buckly down, she's come so far that I was proud of her, and she needs to get back on the program. Clarence needs to try harder too. Group therapy might help, but are they determined to embrace it?
-
2
-
-
Clarence is doing very well. Brandie saying she can't diet because of travel is a bad sign, and she gained 73 lbs. Roshanda looks so much smaller, and she's so mobile, she lost 28 lbs, and that's not wonderful, but she's still losing. Brandie seems awfully happy for someone who gained 73 lbs., unnaturally happy.
-
1
-
1
-
-
This is really Season 7, which apparently the ending episode of the Perrio family short series. Roshanda worried me, with her surgical risks. Brandie, and Clarence were in a better place.
I love when Clarence said the trio had loss almost 700 lbs. Roshanda was the only one without the initial surgery because of her miedical issues I think, and Clarence and Brandie are trying to qualify for skin removal. Clarence was the one who was very worried about surgery, because of a relative's medical issues around surgery.
This episode had the other doctor helping Dr. Now, but that doctor has since taken another hospital management job.
This is definitely a recut rerun, I remember the music scenes with Brandie. I remember Roshanda getting surgery, and the physical therapist working with her, and Roshanda and Brandie's party with Brandie performing.
I think Brandie had surgery first, then Clarence did, and finally Roshonda. I remember the birthday party with Roshonda, and Brandie performing. Everything says Season 7 WATN but I thought they were up to season 8 or something.
I'm hoping for a big update at the end, and for it to be good news.
-
1
-
1
-
-
This is really Season 7, which apparently the ending episode of the Perrio family short series. Roshanda worried me, with her surgical risks. Brandie, and Clarence were in a better place.
I love when Clarence said the trio had loss almost 700 lbs. Roshanda is the only one without the initial surgery yet, and Clarence and Brandie are trying to qualify for skin removal. Clarence was the one who was very worried about surgery, because of his mother's death during or right after surgery.
This episode had the other doctor helping Dr. Now, but that doctor has since taken another hospital management job.
This is definitely a recut rerun, I remember the music scenes with Brandie.
I'm hoping for an update at the end.
-
2
-
-
I bet Coachella refused to let them use the name free, and TC didn't want to pay. The festival also probably didn't want to have some of their people guest judge and film either.
-
24 April
4 p.m. episodes-
p. 517, 6 November 2023
Sisters, Funerals and Guns! ; Ex-Lovers Laptop Fight!
p. 517, 13 November 2023
Drugs, Arrests and Gas Poisoning?! (This is the case where plaintiff and landlady claim landlady paid for carbon monoxide safe windows, of course there aren't any windows like that. Plaintiff and landlady claim there are safety windows) (JJ gave $250 to landlady, I wouldn't give her a penny for her windows she was scammed on).
5 p.m. episodes-
Fractured Jaw at the Rodeo-( or as Byrd is the Word titled this one-"Brokeback Mountain 2: Where Did The Love Go?”) Plaintiff Alec Cherry suing defendant Beau’d Hopkins for medical bills for breaking his jaw.
Plaintiff and defendant were camping at a rodeo, drinking was involved, and had a fight. Plaintiff had his jaw broken by the defendant. Defendant refused to pay medical bills, the bills have gone into collections now.
Plaintiff gets $3500 (Beau'd Hopkins, the defendant, I never saw that first name before).
A Pit Bull is a Stupid Dog to Have-Plaintiff Laura Geoghagan is suing sister-in-law Melissa Smith and Austin Chin (nephew) for attack on six year old little girl, the plaintiff's daughter, by Austin's Pitt Bull. Little girl was removed from court by Byrd. Little girl has a huge facial scar. (I think the bite victim is plaintiff's daughter, but may be stepdaughter. 19-year-old is plaintiff's stepdaughter).
Plaintiff is 19-year-old stepdaughter, living with 17-year-old boyfriend, and 18-year-old nephew of plaintiff, and 22- year-old stepson. Defendant is being sued for child permanently scarred by defendant's pit bull. Plaintiff was watching her sister, and dog attack happened in defendant's room on the little sister. The sister's (plaintiff's) classic response to why she wasn't properly watching the girl, is "I didn't think anything would happen".
Stepdaughter claims she told the stepmother there is a new, adult pit bull in the house, and stepmother says it's a lie, she didn't know about the dog. The dog was the boyfriend's dog. Why would any one with sense (stepmother) let a six-year-old go to stay with the 17-, 18-, and 19-year-old fools for a weekend anyway? Stepmother (plaintiff) claims she didn't know about the Pit Bull, just the Husky.
Stepmother says the dog was a new addition, and there was a husky in the household, then the pit bull left, and was brought back. The little girl was bitten in the defendant's (17-year-old boyfriend) room. As JJ says, stepmother/plaintiff hadn't been to the house for a long time, and allowed the girl to stay for the weekend with the fool step daughter. Case against defendant sister-in-law is dismissed.
Nothing for the plaintiff, because it was her fault the child was there. How sad that this little girl will have lifelong trauma and injuries, because so many adults were careless.
Man's Fear of Large Dogs Comes Back to Bite Him-Plaintiffs Hannah Kim and Brooke WIlliams suing defendant/former roommate Alexis Vasquez for breaking the lease, animal abuse, and filing a false report..
Defendant was bitten on the thigh by his roommates' German Shepherd/Husky moves out. As usual, the dog owner blames the victim, and claim dog was provoked. The plaintiffs blame it on the defendant, because he was warned the dog didn't like men.
Defendant moved out and Dog owner didn't mention the size of the dog until the lease signing, but didn't know the size and breed of the dog until move in. Defendant says dog attacked him two weeks later, and dog bite his thigh.
Plaintiff/dog owner claims it was a nip, and the defendant's fault.
Defendant gets away without paying anything, and plaintiffs get nothing.
Gas Explosion Anxiety-(I remember these two, the defendant is seriously wacky). Plaintiff Patricia Sloan planted a tree, between the driveways, and defendant Dr. Phyllis Popp, D.O., chopped branches on her side of the driveway. Defendant says the tree would eat into the gas line, and blow up the houses, so she chopped the tree on her side. However, plaintiff says the gas line was relocated before tree was planted.
Defendant also says the gas explosion threat made her nervous, made her dog nervous, and a bunch of other garbage. Plaintiff wants $1169 to replace the tree, and she's not getting that either.
I think the tree was too close to the house, but that doesn't allow defendant to chop branches off of it, and damage the tree.
$1 to plaintiff. Tree is still growing, so no money for plaintiff. (I'm so glad I didn't move to Phoenix where these litigants live).
-
1
-
-
24 April
“Motherboard Blues”
New, Season 10, Episode
(George Yannoulatos vs. David Gomez)
From the show site: A cellphone repairman admits to accidentally breaking a customer's phone but claims he offered $300 worth of replacement parts to make it right. According to him, the plaintiff then tried to fix it himself, further damaging the phone. Does that absolve the repairman of liability?
Phone is a Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ulta 5G.
Plaintiff suing defendant/cellphone repairman for replacement of plaintiff's phone. However, defendant admitted to accidentally breaking the phone, offered $300 worth of repairs. However, plaintiff demanded the parts to fix the phone himself, and it. Plaintiff claims the defendant broke the phone, and wanted the parts to fix it himself. So, defendant paid for the parts, and plaintiff wanted the phone parts, and defendant did that. Plaintiff says he didn't fix the phone, but only tightened a screw. Plaintiff kept going back to defendant's shop for parts over and over. Plaintiff wants a new phone for $1,500.
Defendant says phone had been overcharged, because battery was swollen (it can also happen with aftermarket batteries that are counterfeits). Plaintiff says defendant's wireless charger made the battery swell up. Defendant says two screws on the back of the phone were broken or stripped, when defendant broke the sensor, he purchased $300 in parts for plaintiff, but plaintiff wanted the parts. Defendant claims plaintiff did the work himself.
Plaintiff went to the phone repair shop four times in two weeks. Defendant says he offered to install the parts, but plaintiff only let him replace the motherboard. Defendant also recommended that plaintiff get a refurbished phone, much less than the $1500 replacement costs. Replacement phones are $300 to $800.
Plaintiff gets $350, this was in addition to the $300 in parts defendant gave him.
“The Gig Is Up”
Rerun, Season 10, Episode 10
p. p. 42, 22 September 2023
-
1
-
-
23 April
4 p.m. episodes-
p. 517, 7 November 2023
1,000 Beer Bottles Clean-Up?!
p. 518, 12 February 2024
Shot in the Knee! ; Save My Business!
5 p.m. episodes-
Pepper Spray Showdown in Atlanta- Plaintiff Kashira Martin suing defendant Jordan White for a false restraining order, and claims defendant started the fight with plaintiff. Both litigants claim the other assaulted and harassed them. Two women were fighting over some unemployed loser, who was texting and dating plaintiff while he was living with defendant.
Defendant has twins with loser boyfriend, who has apparently never been employed. Plaintiff claims loser boyfriend Cory Pippin, contacted her, said he had no kids. The two women fought, and plaintiff later came to CDC (where defendant works), and threatened defendant, and sent her photos of guns.
Boyfriend was living with defendant and their kids, and sending texts to plaintiff and boinking her too. Cory Pippin is a witness for defendant.
Plaintiff ambushed defendant at gas station, and plaintiff pepper sprayed defendant . Plaintiff tried to get a protective order, claiming defendant attacked her, instead defendant received a temporary protective order. Plaintiff was arrested and spent six days in jail for the attack. Plaintiff claims she didn't get a restraining order against defendant. However, defendant has a TRO and no contact order against plaintiff.
Video is of defendant cruising past the plaintiff's house (they all live in the same neighborhood). JJ asks plaintiff if she's cuckoo, and she says yes, she is a little bit.
Plaintiff case dismissed, defendant gets $500.
Charge Party With the Company Credit Card-Plaintiff/former employer Richard Fox suing defendant/former employee Timothy Weichert for unauthorized charges on the company credit card. Defendant fired after three accidents in company trucks in the same year.
After firing, defendant used the company credit card to pay his cell phone bill for two months. Defendant says card was on file, and he didn't do it deliberately, even though it paid his three months of his back cell phone bill, and another month of bills.
Defendant claims plaintiff forgave the money, plaintiff gets $739.38.
p. 492, 19 May 2021
The Wild Party Injury and the Uneducated Fool?!
-
2
-
-
3 minutes ago, AngelaHunter said:
Was it 31 bags of beer cans? I thought maybe it was if they were so light the wind blew them into the canal. I see why the brother cannot handle his own affairs. I couldn't either if I guzzled beer day in and day out.
There were 31 bags collected from the back yard, many were beer cans. The following night 28 bags of trash, a lot beer cans were washed or blown into a creek, and the Department of Environmental Services fined the defendant for that. I think the defendant should have been able to keep every penny because he had to clean up mountains of trash, and was fined too.
-
2
-
1
-
-
23 April
“Anatomy of a Motorcycle Crash”
New, Season 10, Episode
(Justine Moore vs. Nicholas Webb)
From the show site: A driver claims he saw the plaintiff approaching on her motorcycle and had plenty of time to make his left turn. But then, BAM, she was flying across his hood and sliding across the asphalt! Did he misjudge the distance, or did she speed up at the last second?
Plaintiff/motorcycle rider suing defendant/car driver for an accident when he was turning left, when plaintiff hit his car and flew up on his car hood. Plaintiff was going straight going north, defendant was turning left, and going south. Plaintiff is suing for $5,000.
The injuries to plaintiff were very bad. I'm surprised she survived. Defendant claims he was going less than 5 mph, and says plaintiff was going well over the 40 mph speed limit. Defendant says the speed limit was 35 mph, and the impact totaled the defendant's car, shifted his engine back, and he thinks plaintiff was speeding. Police report says defendant was at fault. Defendant did have his turn signal on.
Plaintiff says defendant didn't have insurance, and she didn't have uninsured motorist coverage. Defendant says plaintiff was disoriented, and he says he thinks she was impaired. He also claims plaintiff said she didn't want the police. Defendant points out that if he had turned as suddenly and was going as fast as plaintiff claims, she would have slammed into his passenger door, not the front of the passenger side of his vehicle.
Plaintiff claims defendant turned right in front of her, but he was going slowly, and unless the defendant didn't see her, or she was speeding. I suspect she was speeding, and maybe impaired. Defendant says he thinks from the damages, that plaintiff was going 50 to 60 mph in a 35 or 40 mph zone (they said 35 and 40 a couple of times.) The direction defendant was turning wasn't a 90 degree angle, it was to turn into an alley, crossing the path of the people coming off of a stop sign on his left. It wasn't a full right angle turn, but much less than that.
As usual Corriero takes the side of the plaintiff. Defendant had been driving without insurance for six months. Defendant also claims the plaintiff seemed to be impaired too. Plaintiff denies speeding. Plaintiff says she had no chance to veer out of the way.
The speed limit is 35 mph on that street. Police report was wrong, and plaintiff was to claim the speed limit was 40 mph.
Plaintiff still wants her co-pays, but doesn't know how much that bills were, and didn't bring her dental bills. Motorcycle was worth about $4500.
I think the police were wrong, plaintiff was speeding. Defendant came to complete stop, and saw motorcycle very far away, but she was speeding.
Plaintiff receives $5,000.
“Scoot Scootin' Boogie"
Rerun, Season 10, Episode 9
p. 42, 21 September 2023
-
3
-
-
3 hours ago, chessiegal said:
Me too! But I think it's because I mostly listen to the TV rather than watch, so the visual was lost.
I've seen a 3rd brand of whole-body deodorant, can't remember the name.
I can't find it, but there is a Lume commercial with the woman in a bathroom with towel wrapped around her head. She says something to the effect of "they" try to make us embarrassed about odors other than armpits. Exactly who is "they"? As far as I can tell, the only ones trying to makle us feel bad about BO are the deodorant companies!
I've seen commercials for Lume, Secret, Dove, and Old Spice advertising whole body deodorant.
-
3
-
1
-
-
The Neptune home from a few seasons ago has been toned down a lot and it's for sale. I bet making it look normal cost way more than $150,000.
The Midwest homes from this season are really ugly.
The Ohio house is horrible. I hate to think what that rug looks like underneath. I can't believe anyone bought that place. No way $150k will fix it
The dome home with the brown bathroom, and toilet facing a mirror is awful, but the main bedroom with an ensuite kitchen is just weird. Maybe the main was built as a separate suite with the separate entrance? There are at least three kitchens. Carpeted bathroom walls are disgusting. I don't think this one is fixable for the reno budget either.
Cincinnati house looks normal from the outside. The fireplace/fountain former alligator pit is horrible. The light switches are strange, and the downstairs bath is strange too. Exposed wiring in the downstair tub area is a total safety hazard. The other bathroom is huge, and hideous. The daughter's bedroom is so bad, with another alligator tank, and so many skylights, I believe what they said about impossible to control the temperature in there. This one might be fixable for $150k.
Winner is the dome home.
Pacific Northwest is next.
Seattle-So many steps! Poor Retta. Mirrors everywhere, walls, ceilings. patios are all rotting. It's hard to walk without slamming into a mirror. Sharp corners everywhere. There are mirror palmtree murals everywhere. The office is totally mirrored, and dangerous as hell. the various carpets in the same area are awful. Bathroom was mirrored, and is now usable, but the homeowners have a tiny mirror. They have to be careful, because the wall mirrors and murals are very sharp.
Sultan, WA--House is an octogon, on 6.7 acres of land. House is a maze inside. The- rooms are pie shaped. Rock walls everywhere, with mirrors. The pole in the center of the library is mirrored, and holds the entire building up. The dining room light holds 64 light bulbs. Main bedroom and bath have 1500 sq ft, 40 vanity lights in the bathroom. There are 14 rooms in the basement, including a bathroom with 4 steps up to the toilet, and a cat washing station.
West Richland, WA-along the Yakima River. House looks more like a bomb shelter than a house. Since there was a plutonium reactor here, I wonder if that's connected to the bomb shelter look of the house? Homeowner's right, everything looks like end of season clearance. Wall texture inside is hazardout. Main bedroom has two sinks facing each other, in a bathroom island, and toilet, and a claw foot tub right in the bedroom on carpet. Kitchen is big, so many patterns, and everything needs replacing. Stairs downstairs are curving and strnage, with a bomb shelter in the basement, with a curtain, not a blast door, and a stage room. Next is a carpeted wall sprial staircase, with hideous carpet, and fake stained glass. Stair treads are only 4" deep.
Winner is Seattle, the mirror house.
-
3
-
-
4 minutes ago, Frost said:
That pissed me off. It comes across as the judges just not wanting to send the last woman home. From the judges comments, Nikki should have been on the bottom. I am confused by the "no sugar" comments about Alex. Strawberries are sweet to begin with.
I am so glad Steven made it and I like Robert so I'm find with him making the final.
I thought a lot of European baking wasn't super sweet? I think they just wanted to cause more suspense, and then send all four to the finale.
-
6
-
1
-
-
Steven, Alex, Robert, and Nickey. Why don't they do a finale with all four?
I like Nancy's headband. Nickey's sounds and looks good. Steven's looks wonderful, but Chipotle could be either great or awful, and apparently it was good. Robert's cupcakes look amazing, not surprised Nancy loves the Tequila, Duff and Kardea say too liquid. Alex's look spectacular, and he lucked out by getting dates. Duff doesn't like dates and Mangos together.
So, Nickey wins this round, and gets a 10 minute head start on the other bakers? I think that's too much time. Everyone's mirror glaze looks amazing. I know it's the semifinals, but I think the criticisms of decorating are way too picky. However, I don't get the point of the pink powder pile on Nickey's cake.
Steven and Robert, go to the finale. Leaving either Nickey or Alex out, I'll miss either one who goes home. No one goes home. I was hoping for that outcome.
-
9
-
-
22 April
4 p.m. episodes-
p. 517, 8 November 2023
Meth Mechanic Slander! ; Safe Deer...Injured Car!
p. 518, 8 February 2024
Pregnant Mom Photo Bust! ; With Friends Like This...
5 p.m. episodes-
Child Abandonment-Plaintiff Alida Mason says she loaned defendant/ former daughter-in-law Samantha Batesmoney for a car, was a co-signer, and defendant abandoned the husband, child, and car. Plaintiff wants the title signed over so she can sell it, and recoup some of the money.
Defendant says "I won't get any money", so tough, and refuses to sign the title. Defendant is counter claiming for payments on the car, or the car back. (Bet the new boyfriend will pay the car off for her). We don't know if the title was signed over, or not. (Son / ex-husband is in the military, stationed in Arizona, so I doubt he could be in L.A. for the hearing).
Decision is for defendant to sign over the car title, and plaintiff will sell the car. Plaintiff still gets screwed over, because she won't get enough to recoup the payments and pay off the loan.
Defendant claims she may not sign the title, because she wants to keep it. Her new boyfriend will be paying the car off. Defendant still wants to think it over. So, no real decision.
Beamer Trap-Plaintiff Aaron Jeanty suing former friend Alexander Singleton for toll charges, and damages, on a (2008 BMW) Beamer plaintiff sold to defendant. Defendant had car for 14 months, and it would cost a lot to maintain, so he left the car at the dealership. Defendant wants his payments, and extra $100 a month payment back, not happening, so suing for $3,000.
There are before and after photos of the car. I don't believe the tire was that shredded the entire time, the way the plaintiff says. Also, apparently a tree fell on the car. Estimate for fixing the car (from the tree) is $2800(Something naughty is going on, since the plaintiff's estimate is in the hands of the defendant). Easy Pass charges were paid by the plaintiff, and the state settled for $100 something, instead of $800 something.
Defendant was supposed to take over the payments on the car, because he doesn't have the money, or credit to buy a car himself, or lease one.
Plaintiff gets $2935.
p. 518, 17 January 2024
Muzzle Confusion and Attack! ; Swamp-Hunting Dog Meets Pit Bull!
-
1
-
-
There is already a description for another episode, and it's a a follow up, where they do more of a house they showed recently. I don't know which one though.
I suspect that for the houses the part they can't do in budget isn't horrible, but can get by with some paint, or carpet until the homeowner gets enough money to complete the job. The home inspector chose between the living, dining and kitchen for now, and left the bathrooms and bedrooms for later.
S21.E06: Chaos Cuisine
in Top Chef
· Edited by CrazyInAlabama
I am tired of cheftestants coming to TC, and saying "Desserts aren't in my wheel house" or "I haven't done a dessert since culinary school". If you want to come to TC and do well, you try a variety of local dishes when you know the location, a variety of dishes including a couple of desserts, and a full menu if you make the finals.
I watched the elimination challenge instructions again, and I still don't know what the challenge actually was.