Kindergarten Teacher Abuse-Teacher moves in with loser boyfriend, after mom threw her out, she moved back to mom in December (not for January and February), and then went back to love muffin by March. Wonder if she's really a kindergarten teacher, or another exaggerated job title? They had fight over to have, or not have sex, told her to leave then. She had to take two weeks off of work as a kindergarten teacher, and went to the hospital and stayed in hospital for three days, by the way she called him to visit her. She also told him to take her stuff to her grandparents' place, and he only took some stuff, not her beloved makeup collection. Plaintiff gets nothing. I can't stand the sad sack plaintiff.
Horses Grazing Ignorance-Defendant sued by plaintiff because the horses (not his) on his property are damaging the fence. Plaintiff claims the horses are damaging her fence, and that the renter (on defendant's property) don't know how to feed horses properly. Personally, I hate buttinskys who know everything about your horse, and think they are the world's greatest expert on your animal. Defendant says the fence bottom rolling is because of plaintiff's dog digging under, and going on defendant's property. If that dog is bothering the horses, know it all plaintiff will be responsible for any and all damages, including vet bills for injured horses. Actually, in every state I've heard of, animals attacking livestock can be shot.
Nothing for the plaintiff, and it's exactly what she deserves.
Fiance in Legal Trouble-Plaintiff loaned $1900 to defendant for attorney for loser boyfriend. Boyfriend looks like he's a regular resident of jail. As usual, the defendant calls questions about repayment harassment. Promised to pay back using tax refund, and boyfriend could get work easily, both lies. Plaintiff gets $1900.
What Are You Not Suing Me For?-Defendant ripped down fence, and trespassed on plaintiff's property when the fence was extended to the street. Then defendant called the Health Department about rats running on the plaintiff's property. Plaintiff claims she didn't touch the fence, but did call and claim there were rats, and claims the plaintiff ruined her electric fence. Apparently the fence was an invisible dog fence. Defendant has had nothing fixed, and will only get a max of $139 for the dog fence. No witnesses, so JJ has to work off of the survey, prepped by the plaintiff's husband. Apparently the loony defendant had her invisible fence on the joint property line, instead of inside the property line. Defendant gets $139 for invisible fence, and defendant had it send back to her local court, and she can take her case about the fence back to the local small claims case. Defendant claims her gate fell off a while later, and she's claiming the fence caused that. Plaintiff and defendant go back to local court, without prejudice. I think the plaintiff should move if she can, and then hopefully won't have a loony old bat next door.
When Smog Comes Between Friends-Defendant spent money smogging and registering the car she bought from (former) friend plaintiff she bought the car from. It was supposedly agreed that the cost to fix car for registration, and smog will be deducted from purchase price, the defendant brought zero evidence, and order is prepared for plaintiff to get car back with marshal's help.
Mother Daughter Eviction and Child Endangerment-Defendant daughter kicked out rode hard, formerly homeless, and sad sack mom from daughter's house. Plaintiff accused of making false reports to CPS. Defendant's 16 year old daughter has blocked settlement from school district, and defendant can't touch it, but I bet plaintiff wants her to. Stepdad, Mom, defendant's daughter in law and her five kids lived in the house also, and all were asked to leave. Stepdad was state paid caretaker for plaintiff mom.
Mother's happy smirk says she did call CPS on her daughter, when daughter evicted her and the rest of the leaches. Mom's smirk would be much more effective if she actually had teeth. I suspect plaintiff has a floofy top over her tank top that showed way too much before she arrived at court. Plaintiff wants stuff she left behind, and it's all in the garage, Plaintiff has five days to pick up her junk, and after that it will be trashed, and she will have to get an official escort to pick it up. Main complaint by defendant is plaintiff made false reports to CPS in retaliation about booting her, and the rest of the clan out. I hope the defendant changed the locks, and blocked all of them. Claims the mother damaged her property. Plaintiff has five days to remove her junk, and since daughter didn't get damage fixed, no money. In the Hallterview, Mom is trying to cry, but no tears, and already trying to get daughter to feel sorry for her, and I suspect next step is trying to move back in. I bet grandma also wants to stay close to 16 year old granddaughter, for when she gets her settlement money, and will want a share.