Just watched this and the previous episode back to back...wow. A couple of thoughts:
1. Seeing Darlene try to physically manhandle her way through Odessa into the apartment was both hilarious and affecting. I think she's so used to dominating through sheer force of her personality that she forgets how tiny she actually is. Being physically large is simply an undeniable advantage in some situations, although if she had been able to force her way in, that would have opened up another set of problems.
2. It was fascinating to see DJ's non-participation during the big fight scene. I think this is a reflection of Becky and Darlene using up all the oxygen in their formative years. Growing up, DJ also saw Roseanne as the active one, and that seemed to repeat in his own marriage with his wife calling the shots. With Gina overseas, however, he and Dan are both somewhat passive men on their own. It's a refreshing reminder that men can't be stereotyped into one fixed role in family dynamics. One major complaint I've had about the reboots is DJ barely registering on the radar. There have been glimmers of plotlines (PTSD as a vet, raising a mixed daughter), but nothing has been fleshed out.
3. For the longtime fan, the omission of Andy is such a gaping hole. To retcon a character out of existence who was present for four years...that's longer than most TV series last! I am fanwanking that the reason Darlene didn't mention Andy in her epic battle with Jackie is that she understood it to be the one taboo topic. When you're very close to someone, you come to understand the things that will cause the deepest wound, so even in the midst of a heated throwdown, I imagine that Darlene wouldn't throw Andy's absence in her face. Jackie's situation with Roseanne has been openly discussed and Darlene knew that would hurt, but she still loves her aunt and intuited that bringing up Andy would be crossing the line. At least that's my theory. :)
4. In Roseanne, and especially The Conners, the show has struggled to balance its want to showcase realistic scenarios for a lower-middle class family with its need to adhere to sitcom basics. The reboot's bleak outlook has done a good job of depicting the cycle of near-poverty. I feel like a lot of the humor has been sacrificed...I don't usually LOL the way I did at the original...but I love the reboot and don't need it to be a laugh riot. The challenge is in frustrating the viewing audience with the characters' poor choices or repeated mistakes; they are usually true to life, but in a sitcom, they don't make for tidy TV. This restaurant situation is the perfect example. IRL, their restaurant idea would probably fail (especially with the severe mold problem); as a sitcom, the restaurant will almost need to succeed. Do we want to see 40-something Becky with a new baby living in poverty? Is that entertaining/interesting? Probably. Is it funny? Not really.
Did not mean to write that much! Whichever way they go, I'm glad that this series is running and I'm thoroughly enjoying it. Happy Thanksgiving to everyone!