jjj

Thanks, alynch! Even wrapped up, those look like a dandy pile of sandwiches. "Ham" Did they talk about sandwiches in the interview on Tuesday?

Everyone needs to have a more positive attitude here. Based on future Morse episodes, Nurse Monica is not doomed to meet a foul end. She might be a murderer herself, or be secretly married to a murderer, or be in love with someone else while passing time with young Endeavour. Doesn't this all sound better?

I tried reading the books years ago, and I did not like them at all. And I love mystery novels.

The department store floor worker who was missing his poppy was not the murderer -- that was someone in the work overalls. I asked earlier if we ever saw him *with* a red poppy. But the missing poppy seems to be a poppy-red herring.

Note: (1) and (9) say the same thing. My question for (9) was if it is seen in more than one scene in its episode?

I think that ITV is finding the Lewis and the Endeavour series to be very reliable financially; even though the Lewis series seemed to be ending with the most recent season, there will be another six-episode series in late 2014 in the UK. It makes me hope that "Endeavour" might get a longer set of episodes next time. I think the writing and acting on all these is so much better than "Morse," and I loved "Inspector Morse". Meant to say earlier that they were using the Mozart Requiem in "Sway," and Mozart was a Freemason, so as far as I could tell, that was the only Mason reference in this episode, after two references in the previous two episodes. I hope some of these references get pulled together in the fourth/final episode of this current season.

Does it appear in more than one scene in its episode?

Was it a gift or loan from Luke?

Oh, wow, thank you for that musical reference, peeayebee! I'm good with the classical references, but I never would have gotten to this one!

I am pretty sure that there will be a Season Three -- and I read that there is filming happening for the next season of "Inspector Lewis". But I don't want to read too much about the future of "Endeavour" until this current series finishes. Warning: because these episodes have already aired in Britain, there are articles findable via searches that do reveal plot points. I made my eyes do the equivalent of "La-la-la" to block the spoilers. But I got a clear sense that there at least will be a series three. Apparently the main kibosh Colin Dexter has put on this spinoff is that it not go into the 1970s, when the Morse we all know was active in the original series. (I know, those were filmed in the 1980s -- I am just reporting on what I read! And I did not want to read too deeply at this point!) No spoilers! Oh, and I got the titles of "Trove" and "Nocturne" -- but what is the significance of "Sway"?

Yes, I think you make a contribution around November 1, so wear the poppy until Remembrance Day on the 11th. So, when that employee was being chastised for not wearing one, it was because it looked like he had not contributed to the fund/cause (not sure where the contributions would have gone back then). Any place of business would want to appear to be supportive of the days of remembrance. Since presumably the actual murderer lost his poppy while with the victim in the bathtub, did we ever see him with and without a poppy? I thought they were just in work overalls. Will check this evening.

I might tweak my television hue settings to watch part of this in black and white -- I bet it will look just like a 60s British film.

Oh, THANK you! I was not even trying to place him, but felt there was something familiar about him!

This feels so authentic that I actually was thinking I was seeing some actors from 1960s British films a few times, and I had to shake my head and remember this was not actually *filmed* in 1966! The hairstyles and clothing are so well done. Wow, did they add a lot of depth to Thursday this week! But I am concerned about the bit in the first ten minutes, when it sounded like Morse was about to be put "on report" for looking in the other DI's file. Seems like they are setting him up for a specific or general subordination slapdown.

Well, that was sad. The dread they were conveying in this episode had me convinced that either the nurse or the Italian woman was not going to make it to the end of the episode. I'm glad the nurse is still there -- I know nothing about where that all goes, and am happy to be spoiler-free. How many times did Morse look at other couples shopping or eating, with some sense of -- not even longing -- trepidation? That future was not for him, as we all know.

That is very impressive topic and solution! I thought I had all the scripts memorized, and I did not recall that!

Yale FNDs! Not Wile E. Coyote! (the anvil conversation) Not a real question. Just too hot to focus.

Was this person Russian? Was this person Italian? (If one of these is "yes", I will let someone else complete the job, as my connectivity is iffy, so I should not be the "host"!) (Boy, she really did make some dramatic analogies!)

Thanks for moving things along! I'm without power and Internet, and it took a while to find the dialup modem! Have fun! Just to get things started before I depart: (1) Was this political figure seen in person or on a television screen within a GG episode? And (2) "is his face too small for his head"? (I think that's the right quote, can't look it up!)

1. Not wearable 2. Not owned by any Gilmore, girls or older generations. 3. Not owned by anyone in the opening credits. 4. Seen in only one episode. 5. Not edible. 6. Not seen in the Hollow. 7. Seen in the Yale years. (seemed like we owed them a visit!) 8. Seen prior to the yacht joyride. 9. Not seen at Yale (nor on Yale-related properties like apartments or New Haven restaurants). So, not in the vicinity of Yale. 10. Could fit inside Bert. 11. Seen in the state of Connecticut. 12. Not seen at the Dragonfly 13. Seen at Richard & Emily's home. 14. Not a gift. 15. It has a function, but also has style. 16. Has nothing to do with Jason or the Jason year. 17. Richard and Rory are both near the object and part of the conversation about this object, but neither handles it. 18. It does involve Logan. You could say he INFLAMED the situation. (Trying to help here!) 19. Yes, it was the object Logan placed in the house in exchange for the one he, um, re-appropriated.

Thanks so much for this thread! I love anticipating the locations, but can't stand knowing the elimination order. It sounds like the finish line is not known yet?

1. Not wearable 2. Not owned by any Gilmore, girls or older generations. 3. Not owned by anyone in the opening credits. 4. Seen in only one episode. 5. Not edible. 6. Not seen in the Hollow. 7. Seen in the Yale years. (seemed like we owed them a visit!) 8. Seen prior to the yacht joyride. 9. Not seen at Yale (nor on Yale-related properties like apartments or New Haven restaurants). So, not in the vicinity of Yale. 10. Could fit inside Bert. 11. Seen in the state of Connecticut. 12. Not seen at the Dragonfly 13. Seen at Richard & Emily's home. 14. Not a gift. 15. It has a function, but also has style. 16. Has nothing to do with Jason or the Jason year. 17. Richard and Rory are both near the object and part of the conversation about this object, but neither handles it. 18. It does involve Logan. You could say he INFLAMED the situation. (Trying to help here!)

I will disregard this, as it happened in the Jason year!

1. Not wearable 2. Not owned by any Gilmore, girls or older generations. 3. Not owned by anyone in the opening credits. 4. Seen in only one episode. 5. Not edible. 6. Not seen in the Hollow. 7. Seen in the Yale years. (seemed like we owed them a visit!) 8. Seen prior to the yacht joyride. 9. Not seen at Yale (nor on Yale-related properties like apartments or New Haven restaurants). So, not in the vicinity of Yale. 10. Could fit inside Bert. 11. Seen in the state of Connecticut. 12. Not seen at the Dragonfly 13. Seen at Richard & Emily's home. 14. Not a gift. 15. It has a function, but also has style. 16. Has nothing to do with Jason or the Jason year.

As those are answered already, I'll just refer to the answers to questions 2 and 13.