I agree with a couple of the replies and think that what the show is doing with Louise's and John is absolutely ridiculous. So a lesbian character that doesn't have sex with a man is a character that's not being fully fleshed out? Really?!?!?! They talked about developing her character and giving her more of a personal life but decided to have a lesbian character be attracted to a man? Really?!?!?! In the first season Louise was attracted to Eva but didn't have sex with her when Eva instigated it but this season she hops in the sack with John?!?!?! If they wanted to give her more of a personal life why not continue the Louise/Eva storyline instead of just dropping it and showing nothing between these two women; not even a friendship. They decided this moral, independent, upstanding lesbian woman would go for a man like John instead of a sweet, decent woman like Eva. John's not even a good guy but Louise just throws everything that she stands for out the window for HIM?!?!?! I'm sick of watching this happen over and over again on TV shows/movies. They write in a lesbian character to get more viewers but then the lesbian character ends up having sex with a man. It's happening WAY to often. Sorry writers but lesbians DO NOT have sex with men. Lesbians are NOT attracted to men. Lesbians are NOT just waiting for the right man to come along and show them what they are missing.
