I am curious about this only cause I guess I don't totally understand how the courts would figure out how child support should be determined. I am sure Kail brings in way more money than Jo and I thought child support was to make sure that a child has fairly equal living conditions in both homes. I do think it is Jo's responsibility to help to pay for the roof over Isaac's head, food on his plate, a reliable vehicle to get him places, etc. But if Kail has "outgrown" a home because her and her new husband had a new child, how is that bigger home Jo's to pay more for? And the giant SUV isn't necessary for a family of 4? If Jo's child support isn't making a dent in Isaac's private school tuition, maybe it's because Jo can't afford private school and Isaac shouldn't go unless Kail is willing to pay for it herself? Does anyone know how are these decisions that she makes viewed by the courts and how that would have an effect if any on Jo's payments?