Jump to content

Type keyword(s) to search

rhg63

Member
  • Posts

    155
  • Joined

Reputation

235 Excellent
  1. I am so happy to read your views. I assumed I am the cynical minority. I continue to be amazed weekly at how shallow G is. Can she be any more uninvolved with this child? I notice how they minimize the role of the nanny who is obviously raising little Duke. And how about wondering what would be the best sun sign for the next one? With all the potential problems in having a healthy baby, the average woman is not worried about whether the baby will be a Capricorn or a Taurus. And that's without all the issues involved in surrogacy that makes it so much more fraught with potential problems.
  2. The success of most athletes on DWTS (compared to other 'celebrities') is IMO due to the facts that that 1) they are used to using their bodies in specific ways and are physically strong. This makes it easier for them to perform. Note the Meryl looks petite and almost fragile, but she's solid muscle, as I noticed in some of the shots during the Olympics; 2) they are used to taking instruction and following it in the use of their bodies. All athletes are used to being 'coached' and told what to do--and expected to do it. This makes it easier for them to learn the routines. My personal belief is that Charlie would have done better with a better professional--i.e., giving him the 'coaching' he needed and choreographic to his strengths. This is what Derek does so well (although I'm not a Derek fan, he is clearly outstanding at this).
×
×
  • Create New...