Jump to content

Type keyword(s) to search

Philbert

Member
  • Posts

    374
  • Joined

Posts posted by Philbert

  1. 16 hours ago, loki567 said:

    At this point, I think it's confirmed that Missy Peregrym has been cast as the new lead of the show. It's just strange because usually they kill off the old main character. But it doesn't look like Vanessa's going anywhere so she's sticking around awkwardly like a fart at a funeral. I still maintain that Kelly Overton is not that bad but she's gotten almost zero character development in the past two years. She can't act when she's given no writing.  

    I don't know. I'll check out the show next season but I'm close to checking out. On the whole, I feel like season two was a pretty big disappointment. The show works alright when it's a TWD-substitute and falls at virtually everything else it does. I'm glad Dimitri's dead as that's one less boring character. I think they need to get most of the cast into a single storyline. Also more Axel. Can't go wrong with more Axel. 

     

    I have been championing this show all season but the finale really let me down. It just felt too forced and I don't think the decision just to focus on Scarlett, her mother and Dmitri's little gang was a great idea. This show was strongest with the focus on Vanessa's crew (not necessarily Vanessa) and Sam (yeah, I know I'm in the minority but I love the character). Of course some of my supposition from a few weeks ago turned out to be true-Dmitri is gone and I can't say I'm sad. The actor tried but I always felt he was channeling the Count from Sesame Street ("Von, Too, Tree. Tree Victims. Muah Buah Haa Haa Ha ha"-yeah, yeah with all due credit to "Buffy the Vampires Slayer" for coming up with that joke first). I'll see where they go next year but I can't help but feel the second half of Season Two-other than the addition of Scarlett-was a waste of time.

    • Love 3
  2. On 12/25/2017 at 4:19 PM, snowwhyte said:

    I do tend to think the writers are making this up as they go along. Its been nearly two seasons and I don't know what the ultimate goal is. What do the more organized vampires want? What is Vanessa's purpose? Is it the story of humankind fighting back against vampires to restore civilization? Is it more of a character based tale of a woman accepting her gifts and embracing her role as saviour of humanity? I know we're not meant to have all the answers but I definitely feel we should have more of a sense of what the show is after two seasons.

     

    If this show suffers from anything, it's really poor pacing. I have a feeling that we are going to get a lot more information...in the final episode-like we did in S1. I thought this episode was serviceable. It introduced new characters, killed at least one more off (I am still not sure what to think about Phil's possible death) and left hints that Vanessa might be gone for good. I'm not sure I buy that. I know a lot of people hate Vanessa and want to see her gone. I'm not sure the writers are willing to do that but we'll see. I just wish these episodes would flow together a bit more organically. I'm not sure what's achieved by splitting them into multiple groups and then just showing one group per episode.  I still enjoy the show, don't get me wrong. I just think it should be moving at a faster pace than it has been.

    • Love 1
  3. 7 hours ago, comanick said:

    That entire episode was pointless. 

    It was unless they are setting Sam up as the ultimate big bad of this show, eventually replacing Dimitri. He's certainly a much more entertaining villain. But yeah, other than revealing a few more things about Sam's backstory, that episode really didn't do much for the overall storyline. Grim as death though.

    • Love 1
  4. 5 hours ago, snowwhyte said:

    Reading this news on the same day I heard Dirk Gently is cancelled I am conflicted. I'm glad Van Helsing is continuing but I was considering dropping it at the beginning of the season. If it's getting a third season then I hope the quality improves enough to merit it surviving over arguably better shows.

    Dirk Gently got cancelled. That just sucks. But I'm glad Van Helsing is getting a season three. Despite it's problems I still enjoy it.

  5. On 12/16/2017 at 9:49 AM, doram said:

    Or just watch the show without "fuck" bleeped out!

     

    I'm really enjoying binging on the 'uncensored' version. Is it just me, or did some scenes get edited (not just the language) on the SyFy run?

  6. On 12/14/2017 at 11:39 PM, CaptainTightpants said:

    I called the old lady as evil from the first scene. That being said, I was surprised by the multiple bullets at the end. though I thought there would be trouble as soon as she picked up the gun. Although this show being this show, I have to assume that Vanessa is probably still alive. And about to go on a fake-mom murder spree. Which Abigail truthfully deserves from what we saw this episode. Subterfuge and deceit never work, indeed! If Vanessa really is dead I hope that Scarlet goes totally ninja on all their asses!

    The "V for Vandetta" voice-through-the-vents plot device kinda went nowhere. I'm not sure why they thought that would work. 

    The fact that these non-military people are mostly interested in immortality and not a cure for vamparism sadly comes as no surprise. You can count on big corporations to be evil unto the very end apparently. Having Harrison dressed head to toe in black for every scene was quite an anvil. He is obviously and robotically evil with a Mr. Burns/Darth Vader kind of vibe. 

    It took Vanessa way too long to figure out that she was being played. That being said this episode was some of the best acting we have seen from Kelly Overton in a while. 

    The biggest plot hole I see from this episode is about Vanessa's real mom. If Vanessa and Scarlet are the result of an accidental exposure to the vampiric virus while she was pregnant, why didn't she immediately turn or die? I'm thinking that either there is some questionable science behind that or fake-mom was lying about that too. Also, does that mean that Dimitri is the vamp-dad? He seems the most likely candidate since he was being held at the farm and experimented on at the time. 

     

    Yeah I'm pretty much in agreement with you here. The episode needed to show us what it showed us in order to move the plot along, and for the most part, I think it succeeded. Kelly Overton actually surprised me a bit in this one-she was actually quite good as Vanessa struggling to figure out what was going on. There was something very flat about her "mum's" joy seeing her and it became obvious fairly quickly that something hinky was going on. The last few episodes have not been quite as entertaining as earlier on in the season but they are at least moving the story forward a bit more efficiently.  Despite my earlier, tongue in cheek post, I don't think she's really dead either. After all, she started the series in a 3 year long "mostly dead" state. If she's got vampire dna, it will probably take more than 3 bullets to do her in. I also don't buy the theory that the show is getting to replace Vanessa with Scarlett. I could be wrong of course but it seems just a little too pat.

    • Love 2
  7. So, yeah this show really has no fucks to give. It's so wonderfully over the top, that I can't help but love the sheer audacity of it.  Christopher Meloni has been a favorite actor of mine for some time but this performance has outdone even his work on "Oz." I like the writing, and although the storyline is a bit grim, I'm really into where it's going.

    • Love 3
  8. 1 hour ago, HoodlumSheep said:

    Dang. I don't know where to begin. This season has been so good (and the second half looks like it's gonna be fantastic as well). 

    I'm probably gonna forget stuff, but i'm still processing that whammy of an episode:

    • RIP Falcone :'( another favorite dead. My favorites keep dwindling and dwindling. I wish he could have died in peace. 

     

    One might argue that being shot is less painful than dying of cancer but I've never had either happen to me so I don't know....

    • Love 1
  9. On 12/4/2017 at 6:05 AM, BasilSeal said:

     

    Whatever faults this show has, it's much better at exploring the moral dichotomy at the heart of surviving a world changing event like The Rising. I thought the first series dealt very well with the duplicitous nature of survival, they group must work together, but everyone has their own angle, and their own secrets, It's a theme that the walking dead tries, and IMO fails miserably, to deal with.

     

    This post so much. I absolutely loath TWD and I don't understand why some people still like it. It's become a boring, self indulgent mess.  I think SyFy's "Z Nation" does a MUCH better job at this-on just about every level. 

    • Love 3
  10. All, I can say here is "Wow." Gotham finally pulled the trigger and gave a lot of fans what they had been wanting- a tacit admission by the writers that Jim Gordon is NOT the hero of this story, even if he might not actually be an intentional villain. Sophia was absolutely right in her speech. Everything that Jim has done since season one, since the pilot in fact, has been leading up to this point. Every shady deal he made, every skirt of the law he pulled, usually while trumpeting his own self righteousness has come at last come home to roost. Yeah, he's at least partially rebuilt the GCPD into something resembling an actual, functioning police department but at what cost? There are a LOT of dead people lying between him and his high minded ambition. What was that old saying about the Road to Hell and Good intentions?

    We can always ask Jim. He's clearly on it.

     

    10/10

    • Love 9
  11. On 12/4/2017 at 6:25 PM, loki567 said:

    I almost wonder if there's something up with Kelly Overton's contract because Scarlett feels like one of those instances when the writers are trying to replace a major character. She's a Van Helsing, she's part of the same experiments as Vanessa, she has ninja skills, and now she has a flirtation with Axel. Basically seems like Missy Peregrym could be the lead without that much trouble.

    Speaking of Axel, the show is so much better off with the non-vampire version of him being front and center. VH desperately needs a sense of humor and he gives it one. 

     

    After tonight's episode, we seem to be well past the 'flirting' part...and that really works for me.

    • Love 4
  12. On 11/28/2017 at 8:30 PM, CaptainTightpants said:

    But Axel really seemed to have a crush on Doc too. He was going to give her his last pudding cup! Although I thought from the by-play at the compound that they were hinting that Doc is gay, so that might be a non-starter. 

     And tonight there was at least some flirting between him and Vanessa's sister. Damn dog. It's true what they say about Marines :)

    • Love 3
  13. On 11/12/2017 at 5:44 PM, ferjy said:

    I think there's a  good reason why she won't turn him that we don't know about yet.  I'm thinking about that scene recently when all the people she turned back seemed to feel each other. She felt it too.  It may have something to do with that. We know that their blood is different now. Vanessa may be afraid that there is something bad in store for them and she doesn't want Axel to suffer that fate.

     

    I think they hinted at the reason during the episode, particularly when Vanessa panicked when Axel stepped out into the sunlight. We've known since season one that Axel has a serious crush on her. I think it's starting to become apparent that she returns at least part of those feelings. Everybody she turned (back) other than Susan and Dylan she didn't give a rat's ass about. Axel is somebody she clearly cares about, and she was trying to avoid happening to him what happened to Dylan. I don't think it goes any deeper than that. As for the reason why Dylan died and the others haven't, I suspect it has something to do with the Van Helsing DNA.

    • Love 2
  14. 2.05 "Save Yourself"

     

    Holy crap did this show ever just "grow the beard." Easily the best episode in the series so far. That battle between Vanessa/Julius and Sam was everything SyFy had promised in the teasers last week. They also managed to get just about every character in here this week, without making it feel crowded. I have to admit I never thought they'd actually kill Sam, at least not this early on. He's already one of the better villains currently on tv (and I watch "Game of Thrones" :): but there was a moment there when I thought he might actually buy it. I continue to ship Doc/Axel pretty hard and this week they had some very good scenes together. It was also good to see Phil and Mohammed again. The plotline is really starting to come together now as we finally see Dimitri back in the frame, gathering up Julius' remaining crew and making them swear allegiance to him.  That accent still makes me cringe somewhat but at least he's actually doing something now.

     

    So yeah, first class episode and it really makes me hopeful for the rest of the season.

    9/10

    • Love 2
  15. 2.04 "A Home"

     

    A little late on commenting but overall I enjoyed this one. While I don't think it was quite as strong as episode 3 (not nearly enough Doc and Axel) I still think it's a considerable improvement over the first two and a strong indicator that the show is moving in the right direction. 

    1. Vanessa was nowhere near as annoying as she's been recently. The death of her whiney brat of a vampire spawn is actually having a positive effect on her. Keep it up please.

    2. There aren't enough good (bad) things I can say about Sam. He's easily the most enjoyable character on this show. He's so insanely over the top that he's absolutely mesmerizing to watch. I'm actually hoping he manages to survive the oncoming clash with Vanessa that they're hyping for week 5.

    3. I continue to like Julius. The actor is solid and he's actually a nice counterbalance to Vanessa's shallowness and stupidity.

    4. No Phil and Mohammad this week but you can't have everything.

     

    7/10

    • Love 3
  16. 36 minutes ago, rove4 said:

    Oh no, you've reopened that old wound.  *sigh* I still miss TSCC.  :-(

    I didn't realize this show was back.  I'll have to catch up, especially is Axel is back.

     

    Sorry. Didn't mean to renew the pain but yeah, I'm still heartbroken over the cancellation of what was, at the time, one of the more intelligent sci-fi shows on television. And yes, Van Helsing is back and the fourth episode (of 13) will be on this Thursday. Axel is back and fun as ever. He just doesn't like the sunlight too much anymore :)

×
×
  • Create New...