Stratego

You beat me too it 9just watched the episode!). Recall the foreshadowing of Claire (to Dr. Bell) about the cameras to catch mistakes? Lily would have been in IC and I'm very confident that cameras would have been installed there as well as the ORs. I bet we'll see a videotape of NP Nic (they are sensitive to that NP designation) going into the IC, getting the IV, inserting it etc and then leaving the room. Later we''ll see Dr. Lane enter the IC and adjust the dose controller. Dum da dum dum!

There aren't many legendary warriors. Plus, I thought I saw some sort of a trailer?

I invite posters to read Wikipedia's write-up of the battle of Edington. Many names used in Vikings appear in the write-up. There were several earlier battles in Wessex (Ashdown) and others over about a 7-9 year period. You'll see Alfred, Aethelred (preceded Alfred as King), Ivar, Ubbe, Halfdan Ragnarsson, and "Aethalstan". From other sites one finds that Ivar is ordering this war that is led by others (brothers and so on). One of Ivar's brother is killed and one is baptized as a Christian. There is more to find if you research the subject deeper.

Shackled? Bjorn is the guy who is wont to assemble a fleet and "Viking"--leaving the "wife" and any children behind. Bjorn learned from his mistake of having a shield-maiden wife.

One other thing...What is the point of the episode's title The Joke ?

I can't hold back any more... Those Sami darts have fastest damn poison ever devised! Where did it come from? What is it? I wonder why no one else (oh say for the next 12 centuries) hasn't continued to use it? Archers were shown when marching out of Kattegat (yes Vikings did have them!) but nobody used them! Normally they are placed like artillery (well behind the front) used in volleys against a massed formation. Also used against the enemy leaders. Thus, there would be shields used in the attack. Horses were shown when Lagertha, Bjorn, and Ubbe left the town--but why did they lose them? Mounted knights are really effective (not so good if archers are near though) as shown by the bishop in York. That battle would have been decisive and the GHA would have withdrawn to the ships. If a second assault is forthcoming, I cry BS! This is not some professional army that trains as an army--they are individuals would fight in packs (local leaders) who have pledged allegiance to someone like Ivar. That allegiance only lasts in victory.

There has to be a reason why the bishop character was brought to Kattegat--or for that matter in this season at all. At best Heahmund is a "MacGuffin". One curious point is that everyone who sees Heahmond's sword is in awe of it. I sure hope that this gets explained (and developed) soon.

Now that Kattegat is settled Bjorn can return to the Med--where his destiny awaits! I have to laugh at these battles--real combatants were generally in very close quarters--like a phalanx or wedges. The "chiefs" would be surrounded by the best warriors when they fought--which wasn't often! Then there is the proficiency of the women in battle!

There is protocol people. Lagetha is royalty so it is appropriate for her to speak directly to a king. Bjorn is like a knight--but no higher. It would be presumptious for him to approach the king uninvited to discuss his daughter. It's as if everyone forgot that the Vikings have different customs than we do with respect to love/marriage/fidelity. That difference was shown in Season I with Athelstan and Lagertha/Ragnar as well as Ragnar with Aslaug. Bjorn did say he would provide for his children but made it clear that it was "over" for him and Torvii. That seems consistent with what we learned about the Vikings earlier.

Bjorn Ironside built his reputation in the Mediterranean. That, plus Bjorn's announcement to all that was going to lead a sizeable force there makes it mandatory that "something" happen there. One can use there favorite search engine to learn about Bjorn if you want to delve into the subject and "spoil yourself".

No, he would be a Muslim.

We knew (from history) that the Northmen slaughtered the Northumbrians (and many others!). Their comeuppance is a bit later. It appears that Lagertha 's rule will soon end. As they say, "long live the King". Floki and his "disciples" will settle Iceland--they can have it! Bishop Heahmund becomes "Athelstan II"--but I doubt he finds a couple as welcoming as Ragnar and Lagertha! Bjorn continues his "Perils of Pauline" saga. This escape must be epic. I am intrigued by that women (forget her name) from the empire. I will be watching next week, unlike some posters from episode 4.

To paraphrase: "It wasn't in the script."

Tonight's cases (2) were boring. Ignore any rebroadcasts, wash something instead.

The mercy shown to that student was unbelievable--that teacher truly suffered and could have died. That kid should have spent at least 5 years in state prison for that crime.

Tonight's (9/13/17) episode. another "different" episode. The mystery is quickly established--and then we follow "Jeffy" on his journey home. A Deux es machina for the climax--with an idiot DA writing the de`nouement. But this is real life, so....

Not only that, but everyone (including the police!) were treating car theft as a minor crime. All they had to do was: plead guilty, allocute, and sound repentant and all that happens is probation with the crime expunged if "they were good boys".

I just watched tonight's show (S7 Ep 3) and I have to say this season is more interesting than others (so far). There are elements of actual mystery writing than simply a klunky, linear progression towards the solution.

This is Season 7, when does CM learn how to act? Jack Webb (back in the decade) showed more emotion--"Just the facts ma'am".

...and we're back! S07 EP 01 was wednesday. I'm watching a repeat right now (Sat 8/26).

The ending: I think most people wanted a definite ending--simple, straight-forward, and (according to their tastes) happy. But the entire season was based on one's perspective: Varga = bad and must be defeated by Gloria = good yet the outcome of the show (good or bad) is like the outcome of the election--based on one's perspective and tastes. The writer's were trying to show that by ambiguity of Varga's fate. The fate of others was like anvils falling from the sky--too contrived and final--and not ambiguous like Varga's fate. I think the writer used too many characters to tell his story given there was only ten episodes. It needed to be like 24 and have that many episodes in order to "do things right". Oh, and I claim the "Attaboy" for calling the connection between Varga and Mrs, Goldfarb.

+1! Gloria is as incompetent as a cop as the sheriff. She pulls "evidence out of thin air" to formulate her theory of the Emmit/Ray relationship--and then her mind "snaps shut like the proverbial steel trap". Emmit's "confession was nothing more than "I've been a bad brother and took advantage of Ray's naivete. He proceeds to describe exactly (what we saw!) happen--an accident--and proceeds to arrest Emmit! Gloria never asked what happened to the stamp! It wasn't found by the "detectives"--so where did it go? Emmit made no mention that he retrieved it--or that anyone else was at the scene--so what happened to the stamp? Compare Gloria's response to Emmit based on he interpretation of "her alternative facts" and the sheriff's actions concerning arresting an ex-con who "confessed to all four murders". If we didn't know who killed who (like the cops) why would people find fault with the sheriff?--Certainly not incompentcy. Any reasonable cop would arrest the confessed murderer. In real life, the whole thing would be turned over to the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension because Meeker county wouldn't have "the resources" to properly investigate and analyse the evidence. Possibly they would find fault in the story. Though I could see the prosecutor (Meeker County) making a plea deal to avoid trial (likely exactly what Varga wants!). But. that's another story... . My point: the sharp criticism of the male cops is not warranted based on sexism--Gloria made the same mistakes using a nearly identical path to her conclusion. We only know the real facts because the writers contrived everything that way. Ergo, the writers are contriving the reaction of sexism to boost ratings.

Singing to the choir--writing to the audience.

Emmit coming to the police station "to confess" should be an admission that Ray died an accidental death and that the "crime" was that Emmit "took advantage" of Ray with respect to the long-ago deal with the stamp--a non crime. The writing of this season is "klunky". First we "see" the real story unfold between characters, then anvils are dropped so other characters "learn" what was happening/happened around them so they understand what "we" already know.

"The Boss" is a sheriff, an elected "top cop" of the county. Eden Valley eliminated its municipal police force and opted (paid) for service from the county. Gloria and (dimwit) were absorbed into the county PD as deputies. Those were US Marshals. They are there because it was a prisoner transfer bus--their case. Gloria is a Mary Sue character whose purpose is to be the protagonist for the target audience.